On 2020-01-17 at 09:51:42, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> > This series looks great to me, and thanks for fixing this.
> >
> > As mentioned in the PR, I'm happy for you to drop the SHA-256 patch into
> > this series if you like, or I can carry it in a future series.  Either
> > way is fine with me.
> 
> Excellent. Given that the re-fix to avoid short commit ID collisions has
> little to do with supporting SHA-256, I would like to keep the patch
> series separate, then.
> 
> The question whether to move the SHA-256 support patch into your series is
> more a question to Junio, i.e. which patch series will be merged down
> faster.

I need to do a reroll of part 8, so I'll pick it into a future series
(part 9) of test fixes and drop my patch.  That way it won't interfere
with either series making progress, but it will still be included at the
end.
-- 
brian m. carlson: Houston, Texas, US
OpenPGP: https://keybase.io/bk2204