All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] Impveovements for random.h/archrandom.h
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 17:26:27 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200120172627.GH6852@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200110170559.GA304349@mit.edu>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1204 bytes --]

On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 12:05:59PM -0500, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 04:51:53PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 02:54:12PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:

> > > This is a resend of a series from Richard Henderson last posted back in
> > > November:

> > >    https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20191106141308.30535-1-rth@twiddle.net/

> > > Back then Borislav said they looked good and asked if he should take
> > > them through the tip tree but things seem to have got lost since then.

> > Or, alternatively, akpm could take them. In any case, if someone else
> > ends up doing that, for the x86 bits:

> Or I can take them through the random.git tree, since we have a lot of
> changes this cycle going to Linus anyway.  Any objections?

I think the important thing here is that *someone* takes the patches.
We've now got Ted and Borislav both saying they're OK applying the
patches, an additional proposal that Andrew takes the patches, nobody
saying anything negative about applying the patches and yet the patches
are not applied.  The random tree sounds like a sensible enough tree to
take this so if Ted picks them up perhaps that's most sensible?

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, x86@kernel.org,
	Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] Impveovements for random.h/archrandom.h
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 17:26:27 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200120172627.GH6852@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200110170559.GA304349@mit.edu>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1204 bytes --]

On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 12:05:59PM -0500, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 04:51:53PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 02:54:12PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:

> > > This is a resend of a series from Richard Henderson last posted back in
> > > November:

> > >    https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20191106141308.30535-1-rth@twiddle.net/

> > > Back then Borislav said they looked good and asked if he should take
> > > them through the tip tree but things seem to have got lost since then.

> > Or, alternatively, akpm could take them. In any case, if someone else
> > ends up doing that, for the x86 bits:

> Or I can take them through the random.git tree, since we have a lot of
> changes this cycle going to Linus anyway.  Any objections?

I think the important thing here is that *someone* takes the patches.
We've now got Ted and Borislav both saying they're OK applying the
patches, an additional proposal that Andrew takes the patches, nobody
saying anything negative about applying the patches and yet the patches
are not applied.  The random tree sounds like a sensible enough tree to
take this so if Ted picks them up perhaps that's most sensible?

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, x86@kernel.org,
	Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] Impveovements for random.h/archrandom.h
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 17:26:27 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200120172627.GH6852@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200110170559.GA304349@mit.edu>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1204 bytes --]

On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 12:05:59PM -0500, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 04:51:53PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 02:54:12PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:

> > > This is a resend of a series from Richard Henderson last posted back in
> > > November:

> > >    https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20191106141308.30535-1-rth@twiddle.net/

> > > Back then Borislav said they looked good and asked if he should take
> > > them through the tip tree but things seem to have got lost since then.

> > Or, alternatively, akpm could take them. In any case, if someone else
> > ends up doing that, for the x86 bits:

> Or I can take them through the random.git tree, since we have a lot of
> changes this cycle going to Linus anyway.  Any objections?

I think the important thing here is that *someone* takes the patches.
We've now got Ted and Borislav both saying they're OK applying the
patches, an additional proposal that Andrew takes the patches, nobody
saying anything negative about applying the patches and yet the patches
are not applied.  The random tree sounds like a sensible enough tree to
take this so if Ted picks them up perhaps that's most sensible?

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-20 17:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-10 14:54 [PATCH v2 00/10] Impveovements for random.h/archrandom.h Mark Brown
2020-01-10 14:54 ` Mark Brown
2020-01-10 14:54 ` Mark Brown
2020-01-10 14:54 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] x86: Remove arch_has_random, arch_has_random_seed Mark Brown
2020-01-10 14:54   ` Mark Brown
2020-01-10 14:54   ` Mark Brown
2020-01-10 14:54 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] powerpc: " Mark Brown
2020-01-10 14:54   ` Mark Brown
2020-01-10 14:54   ` Mark Brown
2020-01-10 14:54 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] s390: " Mark Brown
2020-01-10 14:54   ` Mark Brown
2020-01-10 14:54   ` Mark Brown
2020-01-10 14:54 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] linux/random.h: " Mark Brown
2020-01-10 14:54   ` Mark Brown
2020-01-10 14:54   ` Mark Brown
2020-01-10 14:54 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] linux/random.h: Use false with bool Mark Brown
2020-01-10 14:54   ` Mark Brown
2020-01-10 14:54   ` Mark Brown
2020-01-10 14:54 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] linux/random.h: Mark CONFIG_ARCH_RANDOM functions __must_check Mark Brown
2020-01-10 14:54   ` Mark Brown
2020-01-10 14:54   ` Mark Brown
2020-01-10 14:54 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] x86: Mark archrandom.h " Mark Brown
2020-01-10 14:54   ` Mark Brown
2020-01-10 14:54   ` Mark Brown
2020-01-10 14:54 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] powerpc: Use bool in archrandom.h Mark Brown
2020-01-10 14:54   ` Mark Brown
2020-01-10 14:54   ` Mark Brown
2020-01-10 14:54 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] powerpc: Mark archrandom.h functions __must_check Mark Brown
2020-01-10 14:54   ` Mark Brown
2020-01-10 14:54   ` Mark Brown
2020-01-10 14:54 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] s390x: " Mark Brown
2020-01-10 14:54   ` Mark Brown
2020-01-10 14:54   ` Mark Brown
2020-01-10 15:51 ` [PATCH v2 00/10] Impveovements for random.h/archrandom.h Borislav Petkov
2020-01-10 15:51   ` Borislav Petkov
2020-01-10 15:51   ` Borislav Petkov
2020-01-10 17:05   ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2020-01-10 17:05     ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2020-01-10 17:05     ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2020-01-20 17:26     ` Mark Brown [this message]
2020-01-20 17:26       ` Mark Brown
2020-01-20 17:26       ` Mark Brown
2020-01-20 17:59       ` Borislav Petkov
2020-01-20 17:59         ` Borislav Petkov
2020-01-20 17:59         ` Borislav Petkov
2020-01-25 17:46         ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2020-01-25 17:46           ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2020-01-25 17:46           ` Theodore Y. Ts'o

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200120172627.GH6852@sirena.org.uk \
    --to=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.