From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0740C2D0DB for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 17:59:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68FFC2253D for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 17:59:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alien8.de header.i=@alien8.de header.b="XMd8vjuG" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727740AbgATR7I (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jan 2020 12:59:08 -0500 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:49074 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726642AbgATR7I (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jan 2020 12:59:08 -0500 Received: from zn.tnic (p200300EC2F03FF0075FD4DB0C8DF3C59.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2f03:ff00:75fd:4db0:c8df:3c59]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id 2D4FA1EC08E5; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 18:59:07 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1579543147; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=E8yvJahz8u60P3zYVn0P6etm4lyGGmfJf6bH0Xyy7nU=; b=XMd8vjuGkhMwuiJurJoolyqiOtsuPzlfQU9iSQRoOmrWlSkUGJb7hosQbL9t8FQ7PxTbpQ nn4Vc78yUd31Ad58e/FLUN/VcuvyrOQ2n3W2x0sz9j4qUl0ivg4dxbMn/3PvPE2AyqacLa OudmraXK5SPyti2iMRgwYV4piS2dsb8= Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 18:59:01 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: Mark Brown Cc: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" , Andrew Morton , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Richard Henderson , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, x86@kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] Impveovements for random.h/archrandom.h Message-ID: <20200120175901.GB576@zn.tnic> References: <20200110145422.49141-1-broonie@kernel.org> <20200110155153.GG19453@zn.tnic> <20200110170559.GA304349@mit.edu> <20200120172627.GH6852@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200120172627.GH6852@sirena.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 05:26:27PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > I think the important thing here is that *someone* takes the patches. > We've now got Ted and Borislav both saying they're OK applying the > patches, an additional proposal that Andrew takes the patches, nobody > saying anything negative about applying the patches and yet the patches > are not applied. The random tree sounds like a sensible enough tree to > take this so if Ted picks them up perhaps that's most sensible? Yes, Ted, pls pick them up so that we're done with this. Thx. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59ED1C2D0DB for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 18:01:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D923422314 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 18:01:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=alien8.de header.i=@alien8.de header.b="XMd8vjuG" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D923422314 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=alien8.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 481fc94WKnzDqhK for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 05:01:13 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=alien8.de (client-ip=2a01:4f8:190:11c2::b:1457; helo=mail.skyhub.de; envelope-from=bp@alien8.de; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=alien8.de Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=alien8.de header.i=@alien8.de header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=dkim header.b=XMd8vjuG; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail.skyhub.de (mail.skyhub.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:190:11c2::b:1457]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 481fZ469qyzDq5b for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 04:59:24 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from zn.tnic (p200300EC2F03FF0075FD4DB0C8DF3C59.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2f03:ff00:75fd:4db0:c8df:3c59]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id 2D4FA1EC08E5; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 18:59:07 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1579543147; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=E8yvJahz8u60P3zYVn0P6etm4lyGGmfJf6bH0Xyy7nU=; b=XMd8vjuGkhMwuiJurJoolyqiOtsuPzlfQU9iSQRoOmrWlSkUGJb7hosQbL9t8FQ7PxTbpQ nn4Vc78yUd31Ad58e/FLUN/VcuvyrOQ2n3W2x0sz9j4qUl0ivg4dxbMn/3PvPE2AyqacLa OudmraXK5SPyti2iMRgwYV4piS2dsb8= Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 18:59:01 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] Impveovements for random.h/archrandom.h Message-ID: <20200120175901.GB576@zn.tnic> References: <20200110145422.49141-1-broonie@kernel.org> <20200110155153.GG19453@zn.tnic> <20200110170559.GA304349@mit.edu> <20200120172627.GH6852@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200120172627.GH6852@sirena.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Theodore Y. Ts'o" , herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, x86@kernel.org, Richard Henderson , linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 05:26:27PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > I think the important thing here is that *someone* takes the patches. > We've now got Ted and Borislav both saying they're OK applying the > patches, an additional proposal that Andrew takes the patches, nobody > saying anything negative about applying the patches and yet the patches > are not applied. The random tree sounds like a sensible enough tree to > take this so if Ted picks them up perhaps that's most sensible? Yes, Ted, pls pick them up so that we're done with this. Thx. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D13C8C2D0DB for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 17:59:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5F6822314 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 17:59:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="jfPsETrM"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=alien8.de header.i=@alien8.de header.b="XMd8vjuG" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A5F6822314 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=alien8.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=lcqsLy7N6WK6JF8R3UzQ+CFPabKBUAFrrf0oD+mO0Ec=; b=jfPsETrMLmJPrC 9QsnkhqmQ85iHK7qjnJ1QF28DQ58BfxQQ2/ZbpUNmFn57hLNiwuYFhM5TOG1S6hfjYT47le5cfDoo 8OOh6pgmNnqKNvFcKZwMdbZCObHgupfOSoCJMtGnI/JfpuX9B229Ntv1O96z47Ost/eh+2hXZ4mq7 5UDIpXMFIpVpTDTyZUkOI9Uu7tYpbdA39lsYf3Y1iGqJkzEORjIcUqUSp7usQzfcHOploC1JsqJsn hSq+ON5S9XyK6rXy5jtzul07kmT8LLA2RwsuCEXLTZiXLENF2X9ALcFnsayPEaayI97P60ohyOSIU r9uBuELm2toCMmiWjgsQ==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1itbKZ-0003GN-Uy; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 17:59:19 +0000 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([2a01:4f8:190:11c2::b:1457]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1itbKV-0003Fs-7a for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 17:59:18 +0000 Received: from zn.tnic (p200300EC2F03FF0075FD4DB0C8DF3C59.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2f03:ff00:75fd:4db0:c8df:3c59]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id 2D4FA1EC08E5; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 18:59:07 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1579543147; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=E8yvJahz8u60P3zYVn0P6etm4lyGGmfJf6bH0Xyy7nU=; b=XMd8vjuGkhMwuiJurJoolyqiOtsuPzlfQU9iSQRoOmrWlSkUGJb7hosQbL9t8FQ7PxTbpQ nn4Vc78yUd31Ad58e/FLUN/VcuvyrOQ2n3W2x0sz9j4qUl0ivg4dxbMn/3PvPE2AyqacLa OudmraXK5SPyti2iMRgwYV4piS2dsb8= Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 18:59:01 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] Impveovements for random.h/archrandom.h Message-ID: <20200120175901.GB576@zn.tnic> References: <20200110145422.49141-1-broonie@kernel.org> <20200110155153.GG19453@zn.tnic> <20200110170559.GA304349@mit.edu> <20200120172627.GH6852@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200120172627.GH6852@sirena.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200120_095915_431594_6E3E4A63 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 7.93 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Theodore Y. Ts'o" , herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, x86@kernel.org, Richard Henderson , linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 05:26:27PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > I think the important thing here is that *someone* takes the patches. > We've now got Ted and Borislav both saying they're OK applying the > patches, an additional proposal that Andrew takes the patches, nobody > saying anything negative about applying the patches and yet the patches > are not applied. The random tree sounds like a sensible enough tree to > take this so if Ted picks them up perhaps that's most sensible? Yes, Ted, pls pick them up so that we're done with this. Thx. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel