From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ABF2C2D0DB for ; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 17:43:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEE4A2075D for ; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 17:43:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=lunn.ch header.i=@lunn.ch header.b="wqBNQ7dF" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2390745AbgAXRnS (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jan 2020 12:43:18 -0500 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([185.16.172.187]:53204 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2387629AbgAXRnS (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jan 2020 12:43:18 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lunn.ch; s=20171124; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=xlB7pdO8ZpjfH97DTU8ogLfu7UznhJEWnG5qDbqO3Iw=; b=wqBNQ7dFNb444gmlYzy+FkUH9b ZZSdEeka+ujTphy8GhsZX33kbGtZgKXKfJvz0vW5zqmhreezwudODlAtwfpkM9KVIyb3ouv6V71gb eUf9VQuYM+mkJ6Q7FZlm3+0L4lCca3v2d6C4QvaimE/wytiVshjrQTWvqFmRad3g1pHE=; Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1iv2zD-0003UM-8e; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 18:43:15 +0100 Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2020 18:43:15 +0100 From: Andrew Lunn To: Horatiu Vultur Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, jiri@resnulli.us, ivecera@redhat.com, davem@davemloft.net, roopa@cumulusnetworks.com, nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com, anirudh.venkataramanan@intel.com, olteanv@gmail.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com Subject: Re: [RFC net-next v3 03/10] net: bridge: mrp: Add MRP interface used by netlink Message-ID: <20200124174315.GC13647@lunn.ch> References: <20200124161828.12206-1-horatiu.vultur@microchip.com> <20200124161828.12206-4-horatiu.vultur@microchip.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200124161828.12206-4-horatiu.vultur@microchip.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > br_mrp_flush - will flush the FDB. How does this differ from a normal bridge flush? I assume there is a way for user space to flush the bridge FDB. Andrew From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lunn.ch; s=20171124; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=xlB7pdO8ZpjfH97DTU8ogLfu7UznhJEWnG5qDbqO3Iw=; b=wqBNQ7dFNb444gmlYzy+FkUH9b ZZSdEeka+ujTphy8GhsZX33kbGtZgKXKfJvz0vW5zqmhreezwudODlAtwfpkM9KVIyb3ouv6V71gb eUf9VQuYM+mkJ6Q7FZlm3+0L4lCca3v2d6C4QvaimE/wytiVshjrQTWvqFmRad3g1pHE=; Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2020 18:43:15 +0100 From: Andrew Lunn Message-ID: <20200124174315.GC13647@lunn.ch> References: <20200124161828.12206-1-horatiu.vultur@microchip.com> <20200124161828.12206-4-horatiu.vultur@microchip.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200124161828.12206-4-horatiu.vultur@microchip.com> Subject: Re: [Bridge] [RFC net-next v3 03/10] net: bridge: mrp: Add MRP interface used by netlink List-Id: Linux Ethernet Bridging List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Horatiu Vultur Cc: ivecera@redhat.com, jiri@resnulli.us, nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, roopa@cumulusnetworks.com, bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, anirudh.venkataramanan@intel.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, olteanv@gmail.com, davem@davemloft.net > br_mrp_flush - will flush the FDB. How does this differ from a normal bridge flush? I assume there is a way for user space to flush the bridge FDB. Andrew