From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7681C33CB7 for ; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 16:32:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 927D420720 for ; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 16:32:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=lunn.ch header.i=@lunn.ch header.b="KrVk633e" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726339AbgA0Qcu (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jan 2020 11:32:50 -0500 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([185.16.172.187]:56242 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725897AbgA0Qct (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jan 2020 11:32:49 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lunn.ch; s=20171124; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=BnSfaZk62rOeNYfQ6Q5vO9fhE1qKEGe75T8dAanwXwk=; b=KrVk633erhN4xaEPpKrr+NevW2 GsJ+AKkyK8sVkRdsD/oFOpNTSOHRW9t7+JGjKS/CZTNF4DyHMsjPNisewktHT41HFxJA/CGFjsS4/ 6MzWUO0URxpXbITMLaq1V2Hgi+n9e/2rRb/+LVN6fdjUE9+HVzr666Nc6N9uYoC1ESkQ=; Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1iw7JZ-0007C7-U2; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 17:32:41 +0100 Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2020 17:32:41 +0100 From: Andrew Lunn To: Russell King - ARM Linux admin Cc: Jose Abreu , Joao Pinto , Alexandre Torgue , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com" , Florian Fainelli , Maxime Coquelin , Jakub Kicinski , Giuseppe Cavallaro , "David S. Miller" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Heiner Kallweit Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 6/8] net: phylink: Configure MAC/PCS when link is up without PHY Message-ID: <20200127163241.GK13647@lunn.ch> References: <9a2136885d9a892ff170be88fdffeda82c778a10.1580122909.git.Jose.Abreu@synopsys.com> <20200127112102.GT25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> <20200127114600.GU25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> <20200127140038.GD13647@lunn.ch> <20200127140834.GW25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> <20200127145107.GE13647@lunn.ch> <20200127161132.GX25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200127161132.GX25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Presumably, all these should be visible on the ZII rev B as well? Maybe. The two SFF mounted on most rev B are connected to ports which only do SGMII, not 1000Base X. They tend to work by chance, and as such, i've never taken them seriously. If i remember correctly, you modified your board, moved the SFF over to the normally unpopulated slots, and removed a resistor. That setup then has the SFF connected to the 6352, which can do both SGMII and 1000BaseX. It could also be that the 6352 does have pass through from the PCS to the MAC, where as the 6390 does not? The 6390 is much more capable, having 2.5G and 10G support. The SERDES registers are very different, C45 vs C22 of the 6352. Andrew From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.7 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_DBL_ABUSE_MALW autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74CD5C2D0DB for ; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 16:33:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44D1420720 for ; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 16:33:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="tw+wQhAs"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=lunn.ch header.i=@lunn.ch header.b="KrVk633e" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 44D1420720 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lunn.ch Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=rjoT2TlMkruBAG7oVVdq0sPo+DB4eVjokMYhIgfgbEY=; b=tw+wQhAsMmGC4v 4qq0zuZb9pFIM+3OZGjLjTjPocZOFRsKINetrtqN4Dxs/W4bXtDb8VRBdGJWlKRF1tdTfJrNPEQ0R mPS6IZvCo8wD+HE7CYDVG9Q+bh7/JXDtAm8RRQJftxOQbJjsTg5SdTBeUCSTX4nyfRBg+KRFoHskJ 6GG8bm+0Q1XOtMuZYhlOTh/7n9HmiYUxyNJc1qDCwkoDO/tB7fZ6WlffETH5AmuLF+UGFVckllIrX rSBX+Vo2bbh2592dSgG+j14OY5J4qMxwFjESPgIERgO4MBjF9lHBDW4HpnG5DiyFohNICqdTdG51l 7yMwzBRrN/uG0mtOpkDg==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iw7Jo-0000y7-SN; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 16:32:56 +0000 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([185.16.172.187]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iw7Jl-0000x7-Qy for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 16:32:55 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lunn.ch; s=20171124; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=BnSfaZk62rOeNYfQ6Q5vO9fhE1qKEGe75T8dAanwXwk=; b=KrVk633erhN4xaEPpKrr+NevW2 GsJ+AKkyK8sVkRdsD/oFOpNTSOHRW9t7+JGjKS/CZTNF4DyHMsjPNisewktHT41HFxJA/CGFjsS4/ 6MzWUO0URxpXbITMLaq1V2Hgi+n9e/2rRb/+LVN6fdjUE9+HVzr666Nc6N9uYoC1ESkQ=; Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1iw7JZ-0007C7-U2; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 17:32:41 +0100 Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2020 17:32:41 +0100 From: Andrew Lunn To: Russell King - ARM Linux admin Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 6/8] net: phylink: Configure MAC/PCS when link is up without PHY Message-ID: <20200127163241.GK13647@lunn.ch> References: <9a2136885d9a892ff170be88fdffeda82c778a10.1580122909.git.Jose.Abreu@synopsys.com> <20200127112102.GT25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> <20200127114600.GU25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> <20200127140038.GD13647@lunn.ch> <20200127140834.GW25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> <20200127145107.GE13647@lunn.ch> <20200127161132.GX25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200127161132.GX25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200127_083253_877927_C0DF0F8B X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 7.33 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Jose Abreu , Joao Pinto , Alexandre Torgue , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "David S. Miller" , Florian Fainelli , Maxime Coquelin , Giuseppe Cavallaro , Jakub Kicinski , "linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Heiner Kallweit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org > Presumably, all these should be visible on the ZII rev B as well? Maybe. The two SFF mounted on most rev B are connected to ports which only do SGMII, not 1000Base X. They tend to work by chance, and as such, i've never taken them seriously. If i remember correctly, you modified your board, moved the SFF over to the normally unpopulated slots, and removed a resistor. That setup then has the SFF connected to the 6352, which can do both SGMII and 1000BaseX. It could also be that the 6352 does have pass through from the PCS to the MAC, where as the 6390 does not? The 6390 is much more capable, having 2.5G and 10G support. The SERDES registers are very different, C45 vs C22 of the 6352. Andrew _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel