From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 444E2C2D0DB for ; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 15:40:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16091214D8 for ; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 15:40:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=armlinux.org.uk header.i=@armlinux.org.uk header.b="nlO5iYKI" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729162AbgAaPkA (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Jan 2020 10:40:00 -0500 Received: from pandora.armlinux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:45698 "EHLO pandora.armlinux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728752AbgAaPkA (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Jan 2020 10:40:00 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=armlinux.org.uk; s=pandora-2019; h=Sender:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=N4e1IlRTcR/cWdEmSvMEu/ZvSyKU7DT7I7Dgvs6lFnY=; b=nlO5iYKINdDyWxjQ9d0yXVoKE GWCL7SdUiY47LuCh3ddWUPXlA5ye7GI0FSP+/MNT0PvAR7qk5uZVLkGUG/01IxRt55wMxfyNnGFJw NCbJbc47B5uH1B+0e6sVj3HkRTirYZtFieGQn1zW7joseysNrx0iYs3cnQwU5g0DaOFHI/R1c5rXn ccVWqjqI6OtqU+QbYYJeBq4f3uifwQdnRV/vR6rdvUWntgEfLtiulcSw7H0kGBUewU8aLc0fv3NlA Rt0bmRYl8Rkd5T358olJqXgjy9CNhaqJHtYTYcdYb/veKfHh9j+x+7tZv0keddxyRfIKheYdeGxNr KHSuQrA9Q==; Received: from shell.armlinux.org.uk ([2002:4e20:1eda:1:5054:ff:fe00:4ec]:41668) by pandora.armlinux.org.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ixYOS-0001bW-Oe; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 15:39:40 +0000 Received: from linux by shell.armlinux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ixYOQ-0005W5-Ji; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 15:39:38 +0000 Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2020 15:39:38 +0000 From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin To: Andrew Lunn Cc: Will Deacon , Robin Murphy , Jon Nettleton , Ard Biesheuvel , Marc Zyngier , Makarand Pawagi , Calvin Johnson , stuyoder@gmail.com, nleeder@codeaurora.org, Ioana Ciornei , Cristi Sovaiala , Hanjun Guo , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Pankaj Bansal , ACPI Devel Maling List , Len Brown , Jason Cooper , Andy Wang , Varun Sethi , Thomas Gleixner , linux-arm-kernel , Laurentiu Tudor , Paul Yang , "" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Shameerali Kolothum Thodi , Sudeep Holla Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH] bus: fsl-mc: Add ACPI support for fsl-mc Message-ID: <20200131153938.GP25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> References: <12531d6c569c7e14dffe8e288d9f4a0b@kernel.org> <0680c2ce-cff0-d163-6bd9-1eb39be06eee@arm.com> <20200131142906.GG9639@lunn.ch> <20200131144737.GA4948@willie-the-truck> <20200131150929.GB13902@lunn.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200131150929.GB13902@lunn.ch> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 04:09:29PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote: > > Devicetree to the rescue! > > Yes, exactly. We have good, standardised descriptions for most of this > in device tree. And phylink can handle SFP and SFP+. Nobody has worked > on QSFP yet, since phylink has mostly been pushed by the embedded > world and 40G is not yet popular in the embedded world. That's incorrect (if you read my previous reply.) It shouldn't come as any surprise that I have some experimental QSFP code. -- RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_DBL_ABUSE_MALW,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA0B4C35240 for ; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 15:40:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FAC120707 for ; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 15:40:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="nYBl/wRF"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=armlinux.org.uk header.i=@armlinux.org.uk header.b="nlO5iYKI" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 6FAC120707 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=armlinux.org.uk Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=jFLcl2224mSxriRbM1MP7Xl2Whj80oe5ul/HGKQ1w3I=; b=nYBl/wRFVL+1XO JVUT6mXwXYj1EDjQkjsZ9/E8M18RIxxh7Bft1KR84V502R6m568Cpm74UZxjzL+xTIKsX7BFbfoWz LVpM0K2iVgVrRBDlQXuSzNeu9B6RBtVEgCrzDlktnrss0jg2VxyVMar0snB5grVtYx4178SOhfBU5 1lMsYo2myn4pbZ1zdMLE3F6LAWvYfVV/IqwYF0liVUI/AUk85eQFezMqoi0maM38LMkQVM/EQe1OQ y2GExPAYoBcrh4hEhVC7cebm124YuEOIBsVfkqlJ/mwCAtUlZkcE/KCu14cu2OVCLQPJJ3vAi1VPZ GVeJNkdzt7aPwnBxLBbQ==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ixYP1-0003wm-Fh; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 15:40:15 +0000 Received: from pandora.armlinux.org.uk ([2001:4d48:ad52:3201:214:fdff:fe10:1be6]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ixYOy-0003iD-Ll for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 15:40:14 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=armlinux.org.uk; s=pandora-2019; h=Sender:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=N4e1IlRTcR/cWdEmSvMEu/ZvSyKU7DT7I7Dgvs6lFnY=; b=nlO5iYKINdDyWxjQ9d0yXVoKE GWCL7SdUiY47LuCh3ddWUPXlA5ye7GI0FSP+/MNT0PvAR7qk5uZVLkGUG/01IxRt55wMxfyNnGFJw NCbJbc47B5uH1B+0e6sVj3HkRTirYZtFieGQn1zW7joseysNrx0iYs3cnQwU5g0DaOFHI/R1c5rXn ccVWqjqI6OtqU+QbYYJeBq4f3uifwQdnRV/vR6rdvUWntgEfLtiulcSw7H0kGBUewU8aLc0fv3NlA Rt0bmRYl8Rkd5T358olJqXgjy9CNhaqJHtYTYcdYb/veKfHh9j+x+7tZv0keddxyRfIKheYdeGxNr KHSuQrA9Q==; Received: from shell.armlinux.org.uk ([2002:4e20:1eda:1:5054:ff:fe00:4ec]:41668) by pandora.armlinux.org.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ixYOS-0001bW-Oe; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 15:39:40 +0000 Received: from linux by shell.armlinux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ixYOQ-0005W5-Ji; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 15:39:38 +0000 Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2020 15:39:38 +0000 From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin To: Andrew Lunn Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH] bus: fsl-mc: Add ACPI support for fsl-mc Message-ID: <20200131153938.GP25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> References: <12531d6c569c7e14dffe8e288d9f4a0b@kernel.org> <0680c2ce-cff0-d163-6bd9-1eb39be06eee@arm.com> <20200131142906.GG9639@lunn.ch> <20200131144737.GA4948@willie-the-truck> <20200131150929.GB13902@lunn.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200131150929.GB13902@lunn.ch> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200131_074012_714933_0F2350F9 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 9.94 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Calvin Johnson , stuyoder@gmail.com, nleeder@codeaurora.org, Ioana Ciornei , Cristi Sovaiala , Hanjun Guo , Will Deacon , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Marc Zyngier , Pankaj Bansal , Jon Nettleton , ACPI Devel Maling List , Len Brown , Jason Cooper , Andy Wang , Makarand Pawagi , Varun Sethi , Thomas Gleixner , linux-arm-kernel , Laurentiu Tudor , Paul Yang , Ard Biesheuvel , "" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Shameerali Kolothum Thodi , Sudeep Holla , Robin Murphy Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 04:09:29PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote: > > Devicetree to the rescue! > > Yes, exactly. We have good, standardised descriptions for most of this > in device tree. And phylink can handle SFP and SFP+. Nobody has worked > on QSFP yet, since phylink has mostly been pushed by the embedded > world and 40G is not yet popular in the embedded world. That's incorrect (if you read my previous reply.) It shouldn't come as any surprise that I have some experimental QSFP code. -- RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel