All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
To: Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>
Cc: ehabkost@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com, armbru@redhat.com,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, rth@twiddle.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/18] APIC ID fixes for AMD EPYC CPU models
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2020 15:59:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200203155921.658d7765@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <157541968844.46157.17994918142533791313.stgit@naples-babu.amd.com>

On Tue, 03 Dec 2019 18:36:54 -0600
Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com> wrote:

> This series fixes APIC ID encoding problems on AMD EPYC CPUs.
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1728166
> 
> Currently, the APIC ID is decoded based on the sequence
> sockets->dies->cores->threads. This works for most standard AMD and other
> vendors' configurations, but this decoding sequence does not follow that of
> AMD's APIC ID enumeration strictly. In some cases this can cause CPU topology
> inconsistency.  When booting a guest VM, the kernel tries to validate the
> topology, and finds it inconsistent with the enumeration of EPYC cpu models.
> 
> To fix the problem we need to build the topology as per the Processor
> Programming Reference (PPR) for AMD Family 17h Model 01h, Revision B1
> Processors. It is available at https://www.amd.com/system/files/TechDocs/55570-B1_PUB.zip
> 
> Here is the text from the PPR.
> Operating systems are expected to use Core::X86::Cpuid::SizeId[ApicIdSize], the
> number of least significant bits in the Initial APIC ID that indicate core ID
> within a processor, in constructing per-core CPUID masks.
> Core::X86::Cpuid::SizeId[ApicIdSize] determines the maximum number of cores
> (MNC) that the processor could theoretically support, not the actual number of
> cores that are actually implemented or enabled on the processor, as indicated
> by Core::X86::Cpuid::SizeId[NC].
> Each Core::X86::Apic::ApicId[ApicId] register is preset as follows:
> • ApicId[6] = Socket ID.
> • ApicId[5:4] = Node ID.
> • ApicId[3] = Logical CCX L3 complex ID
> • ApicId[2:0]= (SMT) ? {LogicalCoreID[1:0],ThreadId} : {1'b0,LogicalCoreID[1:0]}


After checking out all patches and some pondering, used here approach
looks to me too intrusive for the task at hand especially where it
comes to generic code.

(Ignore till ==== to see suggestion how to simplify without reading
reasoning behind it first)

Lets look for a way to simplify it a little bit.

So problem we are trying to solve,
 1: calculate APIC IDs based on cpu type (to e more specific: for EPYC based CPUs)
 2: it depends on knowing total number of numa nodes.

Externally workflow looks like following:
  1. user provides -smp x,sockets,cores,...,maxcpus
      that's used by possible_cpu_arch_ids() singleton to build list of
      possible CPUs (which is available to user via command 'hotpluggable-cpus')

      Hook could be called very early and possible_cpus data might be
      not complete. It builds a list of possible CPUs which user could
      modify later.

  2.1 user uses "-numa cpu,node-id=x,..." or legacy "-numa node,node_id=x,cpus="
      options to assign cpus to nodes, which is one way or another calling
      machine_set_cpu_numa_node(). The later updates 'possible_cpus' list
      with node information. It happens early when total number of nodes
      is not available.

  2.2 user does not provide explicit node mappings for CPUs.
      QEMU steps in and assigns possible cpus to nodes in machine_numa_finish_cpu_init()
      (using the same machine_set_cpu_numa_node()) right before calling boards
      specific machine init(). At that time total number of nodes is known.

In 1 -- 2.1 cases, 'arch_id' in 'possible_cpus' list doesn't have to be defined before
boards init() is run.

In 2.2 case it calls get_default_cpu_node_id() -> x86_get_default_cpu_node_id()
which uses arch_id calculate numa node.
But then question is: does it have to use APIC id or could it infer 'pkg_id',
it's after, from ms->possible_cpus->cpus[i].props data?
  
With that out of the way APIC ID will be used only during board's init(),
so board could update possible_cpus with valid APIC IDs at the start of
x86_cpus_init().

====
in nutshell it would be much easier to do following:

 1. make x86_get_default_cpu_node_id() APIC ID in-depended or
    if impossible as alternative recompute APIC IDs there if cpu
    type is EPYC based (since number of nodes is already known)
 2. recompute APIC IDs in x86_cpus_init() if cpu type is EPYC based

this way one doesn't need to touch generic numa code, introduce
x86 specific init_apicid_fn() hook into generic code and keep
x86/EPYC nuances contained within x86 code only.

> v3:
>   1. Consolidated the topology information in structure X86CPUTopoInfo.
>   2. Changed the ccx_id to llc_id as commented by upstream.
>   3. Generalized the apic id decoding. It is mostly similar to current apic id
>      except that it adds new field llc_id when numa configured. Removes all the
>      hardcoded values.
>   4. Removed the earlier parse_numa split. And moved the numa node initialization
>      inside the numa_complete_configuration. This is bit cleaner as commented by 
>      Eduardo.
>   5. Added new function init_apicid_fn inside machine_class structure. This
>      will be used to update the apic id handler specific to cpu model.
>   6. Updated the cpuid unit tests.
>   7. TODO : Need to figure out how to dynamically update the handlers using cpu models.
>      I might some guidance on that.
> 
> v2:
>   https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/156779689013.21957.1631551572950676212.stgit@localhost.localdomain/
>   1. Introduced the new property epyc to enable new epyc mode.
>   2. Separated the epyc mode and non epyc mode function.
>   3. Introduced function pointers in PCMachineState to handle the
>      differences.
>   4. Mildly tested different combinations to make things are working as expected.
>   5. TODO : Setting the epyc feature bit needs to be worked out. This feature is
>      supported only on AMD EPYC models. I may need some guidance on that.
> 
> v1:
>   https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20190731232032.51786-1-babu.moger@amd.com/
> 
> ---
> 
> Babu Moger (18):
>       hw/i386: Rename X86CPUTopoInfo structure to X86CPUTopoIDs
>       hw/i386: Introduce X86CPUTopoInfo to contain topology info
>       hw/i386: Consolidate topology functions
>       hw/i386: Introduce initialize_topo_info to initialize X86CPUTopoInfo
>       machine: Add SMP Sockets in CpuTopology
>       hw/core: Add core complex id in X86CPU topology
>       machine: Add a new function init_apicid_fn in MachineClass
>       hw/i386: Update structures for nodes_per_pkg
>       i386: Add CPUX86Family type in CPUX86State
>       hw/386: Add EPYC mode topology decoding functions
>       i386: Cleanup and use the EPYC mode topology functions
>       numa: Split the numa initialization
>       hw/i386: Introduce apicid_from_cpu_idx in PCMachineState
>       hw/i386: Introduce topo_ids_from_apicid handler PCMachineState
>       hw/i386: Introduce apic_id_from_topo_ids handler in PCMachineState
>       hw/i386: Introduce EPYC mode function handlers
>       i386: Fix pkg_id offset for epyc mode
>       tests: Update the Unit tests
> 
> 
>  hw/core/machine-hmp-cmds.c |    3 +
>  hw/core/machine.c          |   14 +++
>  hw/core/numa.c             |   62 +++++++++----
>  hw/i386/pc.c               |  132 +++++++++++++++++++---------
>  include/hw/boards.h        |    3 +
>  include/hw/i386/pc.h       |    9 ++
>  include/hw/i386/topology.h |  209 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>  include/sysemu/numa.h      |    5 +
>  qapi/machine.json          |    7 +
>  target/i386/cpu.c          |  196 ++++++++++++-----------------------------
>  target/i386/cpu.h          |    9 ++
>  tests/test-x86-cpuid.c     |  115 ++++++++++++++----------
>  vl.c                       |    4 +
>  13 files changed, 455 insertions(+), 313 deletions(-)
> 
> --
> 



  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-02-03 15:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-04  0:36 [PATCH v3 00/18] APIC ID fixes for AMD EPYC CPU models Babu Moger
2019-12-04  0:37 ` [PATCH v3 01/18] hw/i386: Rename X86CPUTopoInfo structure to X86CPUTopoIDs Babu Moger
2020-02-03 15:08   ` Igor Mammedov
2020-02-03 18:25     ` Babu Moger
2019-12-04  0:37 ` [PATCH v3 02/18] hw/i386: Introduce X86CPUTopoInfo to contain topology info Babu Moger
2020-01-28 15:44   ` Igor Mammedov
2019-12-04  0:37 ` [PATCH v3 03/18] hw/i386: Consolidate topology functions Babu Moger
2020-01-28 15:46   ` Igor Mammedov
2019-12-04  0:37 ` [PATCH v3 04/18] hw/i386: Introduce initialize_topo_info to initialize X86CPUTopoInfo Babu Moger
2020-01-28 15:49   ` Igor Mammedov
2020-01-28 16:42     ` Babu Moger
2019-12-04  0:37 ` [PATCH v3 05/18] machine: Add SMP Sockets in CpuTopology Babu Moger
2019-12-04  0:37 ` [PATCH v3 06/18] hw/core: Add core complex id in X86CPU topology Babu Moger
2020-01-28 16:27   ` Igor Mammedov
2020-01-28 16:44     ` Babu Moger
2020-01-28 16:31   ` Eric Blake
2020-01-28 16:44     ` Babu Moger
2019-12-04  0:37 ` [PATCH v3 07/18] machine: Add a new function init_apicid_fn in MachineClass Babu Moger
2020-01-28 16:29   ` Igor Mammedov
2020-01-28 19:45     ` Babu Moger
2020-01-28 20:12       ` Eduardo Habkost
2020-01-29  9:14       ` Igor Mammedov
2020-01-29 16:17         ` Babu Moger
2020-02-03 15:17           ` Igor Mammedov
2020-02-03 21:49             ` Babu Moger
2020-02-04  7:38               ` Igor Mammedov
2020-01-29 16:32         ` Babu Moger
2020-01-29 16:51           ` Eduardo Habkost
2020-01-29 17:05             ` Babu Moger
2019-12-04  0:37 ` [PATCH v3 08/18] hw/i386: Update structures for nodes_per_pkg Babu Moger
2019-12-04  0:37 ` [PATCH v3 09/18] i386: Add CPUX86Family type in CPUX86State Babu Moger
2019-12-04  0:38 ` [PATCH v3 10/18] hw/386: Add EPYC mode topology decoding functions Babu Moger
2019-12-04  0:38 ` [PATCH v3 11/18] i386: Cleanup and use the EPYC mode topology functions Babu Moger
2019-12-04  0:38 ` [PATCH v3 12/18] numa: Split the numa initialization Babu Moger
2019-12-04  0:38 ` [PATCH v3 13/18] hw/i386: Introduce apicid_from_cpu_idx in PCMachineState Babu Moger
2019-12-04  0:38 ` [PATCH v3 14/18] hw/i386: Introduce topo_ids_from_apicid handler PCMachineState Babu Moger
2019-12-04  0:38 ` [PATCH v3 15/18] hw/i386: Introduce apic_id_from_topo_ids handler in PCMachineState Babu Moger
2019-12-04  0:38 ` [PATCH v3 16/18] hw/i386: Introduce EPYC mode function handlers Babu Moger
2020-01-28 20:04   ` Eduardo Habkost
2020-01-28 21:48     ` Babu Moger
2020-01-29 16:41       ` Eduardo Habkost
2019-12-04  0:38 ` [PATCH v3 17/18] i386: Fix pkg_id offset for epyc mode Babu Moger
2019-12-04  0:39 ` [PATCH v3 18/18] tests: Update the Unit tests Babu Moger
2020-02-03 14:59 ` Igor Mammedov [this message]
2020-02-03 19:31   ` [PATCH v3 00/18] APIC ID fixes for AMD EPYC CPU models Babu Moger
2020-02-04  8:02     ` Igor Mammedov
2020-02-04 19:08       ` Babu Moger
2020-02-05  9:38         ` Igor Mammedov
2020-02-05 16:10           ` Babu Moger
2020-02-05 16:56             ` Igor Mammedov
2020-02-05 19:07               ` Babu Moger
2020-02-06 13:08                 ` Igor Mammedov
2020-02-06 15:32                   ` Babu Moger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200203155921.658d7765@redhat.com \
    --to=imammedo@redhat.com \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
    --cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=rth@twiddle.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.