From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02B41C35254 for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 11:22:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7FB42072B for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 11:22:23 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org C7FB42072B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=virtuozzo.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:45254 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1izIlB-00077L-VJ for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2020 06:22:22 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52960) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1izIjw-0005G7-Rc for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2020 06:21:05 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1izIjv-0001Nz-Ow for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2020 06:21:04 -0500 Received: from relay.sw.ru ([185.231.240.75]:41384) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1izIjs-00015e-Ky; Wed, 05 Feb 2020 06:21:00 -0500 Received: from vovaso.qa.sw.ru ([10.94.3.0] helo=kvm.qa.sw.ru) by relay.sw.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3) (envelope-from ) id 1izIjk-0006Jd-8S; Wed, 05 Feb 2020 14:20:52 +0300 From: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy To: qemu-block@nongnu.org Subject: [PATCH v4 01/10] hbitmap: assert that we don't create bitmap larger than INT64_MAX Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2020 14:20:32 +0300 Message-Id: <20200205112041.6003-2-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.21.0 In-Reply-To: <20200205112041.6003-1-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> References: <20200205112041.6003-1-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 185.231.240.75 X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, vsementsov@virtuozzo.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mreitz@redhat.com, jsnow@redhat.com Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" We have APIs which returns signed int64_t, to be able to return error. Therefore we can't handle bitmaps with absolute size larger than (INT64_MAX+1). Still, keep maximum to be INT64_MAX which is a bit safer. Note, that bitmaps are used to represent disk images, which can't exceed INT64_MAX anyway. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy Reviewed-by: Max Reitz --- util/hbitmap.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/util/hbitmap.c b/util/hbitmap.c index 242c6e519c..7f9b3e0cd7 100644 --- a/util/hbitmap.c +++ b/util/hbitmap.c @@ -716,6 +716,7 @@ HBitmap *hbitmap_alloc(uint64_t size, int granularity) HBitmap *hb = g_new0(struct HBitmap, 1); unsigned i; + assert(size <= INT64_MAX); hb->orig_size = size; assert(granularity >= 0 && granularity < 64); @@ -746,6 +747,7 @@ void hbitmap_truncate(HBitmap *hb, uint64_t size) uint64_t num_elements = size; uint64_t old; + assert(size <= INT64_MAX); hb->orig_size = size; /* Size comes in as logical elements, adjust for granularity. */ -- 2.21.0