All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Adalbert Lazăr" <alazar@bitdefender.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Sean Christopherson" <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
	"Mihai Donțu" <mdontu@bitdefender.com>,
	"Adalbert Lazăr" <alazar@bitdefender.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v7 32/78] KVM: x86: page_track: add support for preread, prewrite and preexec
Date: Fri,  7 Feb 2020 20:15:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200207181636.1065-33-alazar@bitdefender.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200207181636.1065-1-alazar@bitdefender.com>

From: Mihai Donțu <mdontu@bitdefender.com>

These callbacks return a boolean value. If false, the emulation should
stop and the instruction should be reexecuted in guest.

Signed-off-by: Mihai Donțu <mdontu@bitdefender.com>
Signed-off-by: Adalbert Lazăr <alazar@bitdefender.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h |  48 ++++++++++-
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h                    |   4 +
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c                |  81 +++++++++++++++++
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.c         | 120 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 4 files changed, 243 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h
index dc528c6f2eb0..646cbfa07676 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h
@@ -3,7 +3,10 @@
 #define _ASM_X86_KVM_PAGE_TRACK_H
 
 enum kvm_page_track_mode {
+	KVM_PAGE_TRACK_PREREAD,
+	KVM_PAGE_TRACK_PREWRITE,
 	KVM_PAGE_TRACK_WRITE,
+	KVM_PAGE_TRACK_PREEXEC,
 	KVM_PAGE_TRACK_MAX,
 };
 
@@ -22,6 +25,33 @@ struct kvm_page_track_notifier_head {
 struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node {
 	struct hlist_node node;
 
+	/*
+	 * It is called when guest is reading the read-tracked page
+	 * and the read emulation is about to happen.
+	 *
+	 * @vcpu: the vcpu where the read access happened.
+	 * @gpa: the physical address read by guest.
+	 * @gva: the virtual address read by guest.
+	 * @bytes: the read length.
+	 * @node: this node.
+	 */
+	bool (*track_preread)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, gva_t gva,
+			      int bytes,
+			      struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node *node);
+	/*
+	 * It is called when guest is writing the write-tracked page
+	 * and the write emulation didn't happened yet.
+	 *
+	 * @vcpu: the vcpu where the write access happened.
+	 * @gpa: the physical address written by guest.
+	 * @gva: the virtual address written by guest.
+	 * @new: the data was written to the address.
+	 * @bytes: the written length.
+	 * @node: this node
+	 */
+	bool (*track_prewrite)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, gva_t gva,
+			       const u8 *new, int bytes,
+			       struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node *node);
 	/*
 	 * It is called when guest is writing the write-tracked page
 	 * and write emulation is finished at that time.
@@ -36,6 +66,17 @@ struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node {
 	void (*track_write)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, gva_t gva,
 			    const u8 *new, int bytes,
 			    struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node *node);
+	/*
+	 * It is called when guest is fetching from a exec-tracked page
+	 * and the fetch emulation is about to happen.
+	 *
+	 * @vcpu: the vcpu where the fetch access happened.
+	 * @gpa: the physical address fetched by guest.
+	 * @gva: the virtual address fetched by guest.
+	 * @node: this node.
+	 */
+	bool (*track_preexec)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, gva_t gva,
+			      struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node *node);
 	/*
 	 * It is called when memory slot is being created
 	 *
@@ -49,7 +90,7 @@ struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node {
 				  struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node *node);
 	/*
 	 * It is called when memory slot is being moved or removed
-	 * users can drop write-protection for the pages in that memory slot
+	 * users can drop active protection for the pages in that memory slot
 	 *
 	 * @kvm: the kvm where memory slot being moved or removed
 	 * @slot: the memory slot being moved or removed
@@ -82,7 +123,12 @@ kvm_page_track_register_notifier(struct kvm *kvm,
 void
 kvm_page_track_unregister_notifier(struct kvm *kvm,
 				   struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node *n);
+bool kvm_page_track_preread(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, gva_t gva,
+			    int bytes);
+bool kvm_page_track_prewrite(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, gva_t gva,
+			     const u8 *new, int bytes);
 void kvm_page_track_write(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, gva_t gva,
 			  const u8 *new, int bytes);
+bool kvm_page_track_preexec(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, gva_t gva);
 void kvm_page_track_flush_slot(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot);
 #endif
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h
index d55674f44a18..b3a20fc98c69 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h
@@ -209,6 +209,10 @@ void kvm_mmu_gfn_disallow_lpage(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn);
 void kvm_mmu_gfn_allow_lpage(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn);
 bool kvm_mmu_slot_gfn_write_protect(struct kvm *kvm,
 				    struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, u64 gfn);
+bool kvm_mmu_slot_gfn_read_protect(struct kvm *kvm,
+				   struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, u64 gfn);
+bool kvm_mmu_slot_gfn_exec_protect(struct kvm *kvm,
+				   struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, u64 gfn);
 int kvm_arch_write_log_dirty(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 
 int kvm_mmu_post_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index f2e016dfffe6..124e7ca73b48 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -1648,6 +1648,31 @@ static bool spte_write_protect(u64 *sptep, bool pt_protect)
 	return mmu_spte_update(sptep, spte);
 }
 
+static bool spte_read_protect(u64 *sptep)
+{
+	u64 spte = *sptep;
+	bool exec_only_supported = (shadow_present_mask == 0ull);
+
+	rmap_printk("rmap_read_protect: spte %p %llx\n", sptep, *sptep);
+
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(!exec_only_supported);
+
+	spte = spte & ~(PT_WRITABLE_MASK | PT_PRESENT_MASK);
+
+	return mmu_spte_update(sptep, spte);
+}
+
+static bool spte_exec_protect(u64 *sptep)
+{
+	u64 spte = *sptep;
+
+	rmap_printk("rmap_exec_protect: spte %p %llx\n", sptep, *sptep);
+
+	spte = spte & ~PT_USER_MASK;
+
+	return mmu_spte_update(sptep, spte);
+}
+
 static bool __rmap_write_protect(struct kvm *kvm,
 				 struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head,
 				 bool pt_protect)
@@ -1662,6 +1687,32 @@ static bool __rmap_write_protect(struct kvm *kvm,
 	return flush;
 }
 
+static bool __rmap_read_protect(struct kvm *kvm,
+				struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head)
+{
+	u64 *sptep;
+	struct rmap_iterator iter;
+	bool flush = false;
+
+	for_each_rmap_spte(rmap_head, &iter, sptep)
+		flush |= spte_read_protect(sptep);
+
+	return flush;
+}
+
+static bool __rmap_exec_protect(struct kvm *kvm,
+				struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head)
+{
+	u64 *sptep;
+	struct rmap_iterator iter;
+	bool flush = false;
+
+	for_each_rmap_spte(rmap_head, &iter, sptep)
+		flush |= spte_exec_protect(sptep);
+
+	return flush;
+}
+
 static bool spte_clear_dirty(u64 *sptep)
 {
 	u64 spte = *sptep;
@@ -1837,6 +1888,36 @@ bool kvm_mmu_slot_gfn_write_protect(struct kvm *kvm,
 	return write_protected;
 }
 
+bool kvm_mmu_slot_gfn_read_protect(struct kvm *kvm,
+				   struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, u64 gfn)
+{
+	struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head;
+	int i;
+	bool read_protected = false;
+
+	for (i = PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL; i <= PT_MAX_HUGEPAGE_LEVEL; ++i) {
+		rmap_head = __gfn_to_rmap(gfn, i, slot);
+		read_protected |= __rmap_read_protect(kvm, rmap_head);
+	}
+
+	return read_protected;
+}
+
+bool kvm_mmu_slot_gfn_exec_protect(struct kvm *kvm,
+				   struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, u64 gfn)
+{
+	struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head;
+	int i;
+	bool exec_protected = false;
+
+	for (i = PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL; i <= PT_MAX_HUGEPAGE_LEVEL; ++i) {
+		rmap_head = __gfn_to_rmap(gfn, i, slot);
+		exec_protected |= __rmap_exec_protect(kvm, rmap_head);
+	}
+
+	return exec_protected;
+}
+
 static bool rmap_write_protect(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 gfn)
 {
 	struct kvm_memory_slot *slot;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.c
index f36e74430ad2..cc3eb2cc7e38 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.c
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
 /*
- * Support KVM gust page tracking
+ * Support KVM guest page tracking
  *
  * This feature allows us to track page access in guest. Currently, only
  * write access is tracked.
@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ static void update_gfn_track(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn,
  * @kvm: the guest instance we are interested in.
  * @slot: the @gfn belongs to.
  * @gfn: the guest page.
- * @mode: tracking mode, currently only write track is supported.
+ * @mode: tracking mode.
  */
 void kvm_slot_page_track_add_page(struct kvm *kvm,
 				  struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn,
@@ -117,9 +117,16 @@ void kvm_slot_page_track_add_page(struct kvm *kvm,
 	 */
 	kvm_mmu_gfn_disallow_lpage(slot, gfn);
 
-	if (mode == KVM_PAGE_TRACK_WRITE)
+	if (mode == KVM_PAGE_TRACK_PREWRITE || mode == KVM_PAGE_TRACK_WRITE) {
 		if (kvm_mmu_slot_gfn_write_protect(kvm, slot, gfn))
 			kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
+	} else if (mode == KVM_PAGE_TRACK_PREREAD) {
+		if (kvm_mmu_slot_gfn_read_protect(kvm, slot, gfn))
+			kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
+	} else if (mode == KVM_PAGE_TRACK_PREEXEC) {
+		if (kvm_mmu_slot_gfn_exec_protect(kvm, slot, gfn))
+			kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
+	}
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_slot_page_track_add_page);
 
@@ -134,7 +141,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_slot_page_track_add_page);
  * @kvm: the guest instance we are interested in.
  * @slot: the @gfn belongs to.
  * @gfn: the guest page.
- * @mode: tracking mode, currently only write track is supported.
+ * @mode: tracking mode.
  */
 void kvm_slot_page_track_remove_page(struct kvm *kvm,
 				     struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn,
@@ -227,12 +234,78 @@ kvm_page_track_unregister_notifier(struct kvm *kvm,
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_page_track_unregister_notifier);
 
+/*
+ * Notify the node that a read access is about to happen. Returning false
+ * doesn't stop the other nodes from being called, but it will stop
+ * the emulation.
+ *
+ * The node should figure out if the read page is the one that the node
+ * is interested in by itself.
+ *
+ * The nodes will always be in conflict if they track the same page:
+ * - accepting a read won't guarantee that the next node will not override
+ *   the data (filling new/bytes and setting data_ready)
+ * - filling new/bytes with custom data won't guarantee that the next node
+ *   will not override that
+ */
+bool kvm_page_track_preread(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, gva_t gva,
+			    int bytes)
+{
+	struct kvm_page_track_notifier_head *head;
+	struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node *n;
+	int idx;
+	bool ret = true;
+
+	head = &vcpu->kvm->arch.track_notifier_head;
+
+	if (hlist_empty(&head->track_notifier_list))
+		return ret;
+
+	idx = srcu_read_lock(&head->track_srcu);
+	hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(n, &head->track_notifier_list, node)
+		if (n->track_preread)
+			if (!n->track_preread(vcpu, gpa, gva, bytes, n))
+				ret = false;
+	srcu_read_unlock(&head->track_srcu, idx);
+	return ret;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Notify the node that a write access is about to happen. Returning false
+ * doesn't stop the other nodes from being called, but it will stop
+ * the emulation.
+ *
+ * The node should figure out if the written page is the one that the node
+ * is interested in by itself.
+ */
+bool kvm_page_track_prewrite(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, gva_t gva,
+			     const u8 *new, int bytes)
+{
+	struct kvm_page_track_notifier_head *head;
+	struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node *n;
+	int idx;
+	bool ret = true;
+
+	head = &vcpu->kvm->arch.track_notifier_head;
+
+	if (hlist_empty(&head->track_notifier_list))
+		return ret;
+
+	idx = srcu_read_lock(&head->track_srcu);
+	hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(n, &head->track_notifier_list, node)
+		if (n->track_prewrite)
+			if (!n->track_prewrite(vcpu, gpa, gva, new, bytes, n))
+				ret = false;
+	srcu_read_unlock(&head->track_srcu, idx);
+	return ret;
+}
+
 /*
  * Notify the node that write access is intercepted and write emulation is
  * finished at this time.
  *
- * The node should figure out if the written page is the one that node is
- * interested in by itself.
+ * The node should figure out if the written page is the one that the node
+ * is interested in by itself.
  */
 void kvm_page_track_write(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, gva_t gva,
 			  const u8 *new, int bytes)
@@ -253,12 +326,41 @@ void kvm_page_track_write(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, gva_t gva,
 	srcu_read_unlock(&head->track_srcu, idx);
 }
 
+/*
+ * Notify the node that an instruction is about to be executed.
+ * Returning false doesn't stop the other nodes from being called,
+ * but it will stop the emulation with X86EMUL_RETRY_INSTR.
+ *
+ * The node should figure out if the page is the one that the node
+ * is interested in by itself.
+ */
+bool kvm_page_track_preexec(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, gva_t gva)
+{
+	struct kvm_page_track_notifier_head *head;
+	struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node *n;
+	int idx;
+	bool ret = true;
+
+	head = &vcpu->kvm->arch.track_notifier_head;
+
+	if (hlist_empty(&head->track_notifier_list))
+		return ret;
+
+	idx = srcu_read_lock(&head->track_srcu);
+	hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(n, &head->track_notifier_list, node)
+		if (n->track_preexec)
+			if (!n->track_preexec(vcpu, gpa, gva, n))
+				ret = false;
+	srcu_read_unlock(&head->track_srcu, idx);
+	return ret;
+}
+
 /*
  * Notify the node that memory slot is being removed or moved so that it can
- * drop write-protection for the pages in the memory slot.
+ * drop active protection for the pages in the memory slot.
  *
- * The node should figure out it has any write-protected pages in this slot
- * by itself.
+ * The node should figure out if the page is the one that the node
+ * is interested in by itself.
  */
 void kvm_page_track_flush_slot(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot)
 {

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-02-07 18:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 79+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-07 18:15 [RFC PATCH v7 00/78] VM introspection Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 01/78] sched/swait: add swait_event_killable_exclusive() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 02/78] export kill_pid_info() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 03/78] KVM: add new error codes for VM introspection Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 04/78] KVM: add kvm_vcpu_kick_and_wait() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 05/78] KVM: add kvm_get_max_gfn() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 06/78] KVM: doc: fix the hypercall numbering Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 07/78] KVM: x86: add kvm_arch_vcpu_get_regs() and kvm_arch_vcpu_get_sregs() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 08/78] KVM: x86: add kvm_arch_vcpu_set_regs() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 09/78] KVM: x86: avoid injecting #PF when emulate the VMCALL instruction Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 10/78] KVM: x86: add .bp_intercepted() to struct kvm_x86_ops Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 11/78] KVM: x86: add .control_cr3_intercept() " Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 12/78] KVM: x86: add .cr3_write_intercepted() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 13/78] KVM: x86: add .control_desc_intercept() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 14/78] KVM: x86: add .desc_intercepted() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 15/78] KVM: x86: export .msr_write_intercepted() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 16/78] KVM: x86: use MSR_TYPE_R, MSR_TYPE_W and MSR_TYPE_RW with AMD code too Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 17/78] KVM: svm: pass struct kvm_vcpu to set_msr_interception() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 18/78] KVM: vmx: pass struct kvm_vcpu to the intercept msr related functions Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 19/78] KVM: x86: add .control_msr_intercept() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 20/78] KVM: x86: vmx: use a symbolic constant when checking the exit qualifications Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 21/78] KVM: x86: save the error code during EPT/NPF exits handling Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 22/78] KVM: x86: add .fault_gla() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 23/78] KVM: x86: add .spt_fault() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 24/78] KVM: x86: add .gpt_translation_fault() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 25/78] KVM: x86: add .control_singlestep() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 26/78] KVM: x86: export kvm_arch_vcpu_set_guest_debug() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 27/78] KVM: x86: extend kvm_mmu_gva_to_gpa_system() with the 'access' parameter Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 28/78] KVM: x86: export kvm_inject_pending_exception() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 29/78] KVM: x86: export kvm_vcpu_ioctl_x86_get_xsave() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 30/78] KVM: x86: page track: provide all page tracking hooks with the guest virtual address Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 31/78] KVM: x86: page track: add track_create_slot() callback Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` Adalbert Lazăr [this message]
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 33/78] KVM: x86: wire in the preread/prewrite/preexec page trackers Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 34/78] KVM: x86: intercept the write access on sidt and other emulated instructions Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 35/78] KVM: x86: disable gpa_available optimization for fetch and page-walk NPF/EPT violations Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 36/78] KVM: introduce VM introspection Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 37/78] KVM: introspection: add hook/unhook ioctls Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 38/78] KVM: introspection: add permission access ioctls Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 39/78] KVM: introspection: add the read/dispatch message function Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 40/78] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_GET_VERSION Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:15 ` [RFC PATCH v7 41/78] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VM_CHECK_COMMAND and KVMI_VM_CHECK_EVENT Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH v7 42/78] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VM_GET_INFO Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH v7 43/78] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_EVENT_UNHOOK Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH v7 44/78] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VM_CONTROL_EVENTS Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH v7 45/78] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VM_READ_PHYSICAL/KVMI_VM_WRITE_PHYSICAL Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH v7 46/78] KVM: introspection: add vCPU related data Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH v7 47/78] KVM: introspection: add a jobs list to every introspected vCPU Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH v7 48/78] KVM: introspection: handle vCPU introspection requests Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH v7 49/78] KVM: introspection: handle vCPU commands Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH v7 50/78] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_GET_INFO Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH v7 51/78] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_PAUSE Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH v7 52/78] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_EVENT_PAUSE_VCPU Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH v7 53/78] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_CONTROL_EVENTS Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH v7 54/78] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_GET_REGISTERS Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH v7 55/78] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_SET_REGISTERS Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH v7 56/78] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_GET_CPUID Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH v7 57/78] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_EVENT_HYPERCALL Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH v7 58/78] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_EVENT_BREAKPOINT Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH v7 59/78] KVM: introspection: restore the state of #BP interception on unhook Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH v7 60/78] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_CONTROL_CR and KVMI_EVENT_CR Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH v7 61/78] KVM: introspection: restore the state of CR3 interception on unhook Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH v7 62/78] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_INJECT_EXCEPTION + KVMI_EVENT_TRAP Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH v7 63/78] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VM_GET_MAX_GFN Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH v7 64/78] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_EVENT_XSETBV Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH v7 65/78] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_GET_XSAVE Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH v7 66/78] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_GET_MTRR_TYPE Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH v7 67/78] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_EVENT_DESCRIPTOR Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH v7 68/78] KVM: introspection: restore the state of descriptor interception on unhook Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH v7 69/78] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_CONTROL_MSR and KVMI_EVENT_MSR Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH v7 70/78] KVM: introspection: restore the state of MSR interception on unhook Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH v7 71/78] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VM_SET_PAGE_ACCESS Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH v7 72/78] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_EVENT_PF Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH v7 73/78] KVM: introspection: extend KVMI_GET_VERSION with struct kvmi_features Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH v7 74/78] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_CONTROL_SINGLESTEP Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH v7 75/78] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_EVENT_SINGLESTEP Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH v7 76/78] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_TRANSLATE_GVA Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH v7 77/78] KVM: introspection: emulate a guest page table walk on SPT violations due to A/D bit updates Adalbert Lazăr
2020-02-07 18:16 ` [RFC PATCH v7 78/78] KVM: x86: call the page tracking code on emulation failure Adalbert Lazăr

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200207181636.1065-33-alazar@bitdefender.com \
    --to=alazar@bitdefender.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mdontu@bitdefender.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.