From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEF56C352A3 for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 16:25:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A4E020708 for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 16:25:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=me.com header.i=@me.com header.b="OO0RlHQJ" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730008AbgBKQZN (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Feb 2020 11:25:13 -0500 Received: from mr85p00im-zteg06021601.me.com ([17.58.23.187]:47749 "EHLO mr85p00im-zteg06021601.me.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729000AbgBKQZN (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Feb 2020 11:25:13 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=me.com; s=1a1hai; t=1581438313; bh=zH3XvUf4Gwnfly5C3NsxYvl9HPUhovFyyHO7111umzE=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-Id; b=OO0RlHQJ3lgyT+MHIBwjbcXObOAArjxyabjUzcbS/V1kTHfKFqoZmIVlVgpFPLD3o CPx3ZQ6mLQwXT1mdv0pBoHwqLEGSXIBq0w/2wgUUfmP4MYjKuWaHDP/KvOOR8xVri6 frqXTiIpv6oXnIdbkM8EoFJaLSVoH63I2poiilqvWRH3IEAZDT1jKT+4CBhhWcZeq5 om0QWhpIMZDhDqemtKHZBt81rsWWF43V7vJvOsqqXKRtURt3j0vCTydqVuMIKKj+n+ 9eCYtEaeOv1Ga9RcUJJzroHQ6/8Z6aUlw/tLUhBHbBrWWYL5R5v8vwNhdK6eTjQX9s kpvzl3b1pkBiw== Received: from stitch.danm.net (c-73-98-236-45.hsd1.ut.comcast.net [73.98.236.45]) by mr85p00im-zteg06021601.me.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B31FF4010D8; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 16:25:12 +0000 (UTC) From: Dan Moulding To: dmoulding@me.com Cc: emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com, johannes.berg@intel.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linuxwifi@intel.com, luciano.coelho@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5.5] iwlwifi: mvm: Do not require PHY_SKU NVM section for 3168 devices Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 09:24:50 -0700 Message-Id: <20200211162450.2493-1-dmoulding@me.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.24.1 In-Reply-To: <20200128093107.9740-1-dmoulding@me.com> References: <20200128093107.9740-1-dmoulding@me.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2020-02-11_05:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=730 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1908290000 definitions=main-2002110119 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org This is just a friendly reminder that this patch has been submitted, for what looks like a fairly major regression in iwlwifi that impacts (as far as I can tell) *all* 3168 devices. The regression is in the v5.5.x series and was for a while back-ported to the stable trees, but luckily was noticed before the releases were made. There are at least a few bug reports for this regression: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206329 https://bugs.gentoo.org/706810 https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/2/7/811 https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=252603 The Gentoo maintainers have already applied this patch to their Linux sources and marked their bug report "fixed". But it would be really nice if we could get this regression fixed in the next stable v5.5.x release. Thanks for your attention! -- Dan