All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [CI] drm/i915/selftests: Exercise timeslice rewinding
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 14:01:50 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200213140150.3639027-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> (raw)

Originally, I did not expect having to rewind a context upon
timeslicing: the point was to replace the executing context with a
non-executing one! However, given a second context that depends on
requests from the first, we may have to split the requests along the
first context to execute the second, causing us to partially replay the
first context and so have to rewind its RING_TAIL.

References: 5ba32c7be81e ("drm/i915/execlists: Always force a context reload when rewinding RING_TAIL")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c | 215 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 214 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c
index 26d39c111d16..6037bcadf847 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c
@@ -76,8 +76,11 @@ static int wait_for_submit(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
 	do {
 		cond_resched();
 		intel_engine_flush_submission(engine);
-		if (i915_request_is_active(rq))
+		if (i915_request_is_active(rq) &&
+		    !READ_ONCE(engine->execlists.pending[0])) {
+			tasklet_unlock_wait(&engine->execlists.tasklet);
 			return 0;
+		}
 	} while (time_before(jiffies, timeout));
 
 	return -ETIME;
@@ -857,6 +860,215 @@ static int live_timeslice_preempt(void *arg)
 	return err;
 }
 
+static struct i915_request *
+create_rewinder(struct intel_context *ce,
+		struct i915_request *wait,
+		void *slot, int idx)
+{
+	const u32 offset =
+		i915_ggtt_offset(ce->engine->status_page.vma) +
+		offset_in_page(slot);
+	struct i915_request *rq;
+	u32 *cs;
+	int err;
+
+	rq = intel_context_create_request(ce);
+	if (IS_ERR(rq))
+		return rq;
+
+	if (wait) {
+		err = i915_request_await_dma_fence(rq, &wait->fence);
+		if (err)
+			goto err;
+	}
+
+	cs = intel_ring_begin(rq, 10);
+	if (IS_ERR(cs)) {
+		err = PTR_ERR(cs);
+		goto err;
+	}
+
+	*cs++ = MI_ARB_ON_OFF | MI_ARB_ENABLE;
+	*cs++ = MI_NOOP;
+
+	*cs++ = MI_SEMAPHORE_WAIT |
+		MI_SEMAPHORE_GLOBAL_GTT |
+		MI_SEMAPHORE_POLL |
+		MI_SEMAPHORE_SAD_NEQ_SDD;
+	*cs++ = 0;
+	*cs++ = offset;
+	*cs++ = 0;
+
+	*cs++ = MI_STORE_REGISTER_MEM_GEN8 | MI_USE_GGTT;
+	*cs++ = i915_mmio_reg_offset(RING_TIMESTAMP(rq->engine->mmio_base));
+	*cs++ = offset + idx * sizeof(u32);
+	*cs++ = 0;
+
+	intel_ring_advance(rq, cs);
+
+	rq->sched.attr.priority = I915_PRIORITY_MASK;
+	err = 0;
+err:
+	i915_request_get(rq);
+	i915_request_add(rq);
+	if (err) {
+		i915_request_put(rq);
+		return ERR_PTR(err);
+	}
+
+	return rq;
+}
+
+static int live_timeslice_rewind(void *arg)
+{
+	struct intel_gt *gt = arg;
+	struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
+	enum intel_engine_id id;
+
+	/*
+	 * The usual presumption on timeslice expiration is that we replace
+	 * the active context with another. However, given a chain of
+	 * dependencies we may end up with replacing the context with itself,
+	 * but only a few of those requests, forcing us to rewind the
+	 * RING_TAIL of the original request.
+	 */
+	if (!IS_ACTIVE(CONFIG_DRM_I915_TIMESLICE_DURATION))
+		return 0;
+
+	for_each_engine(engine, gt, id) {
+		enum { A1, A2, B1 };
+		enum { X=1, Y, Z };
+		struct i915_request *rq[3] = {};
+		struct intel_context *ce;
+		unsigned long heartbeat;
+		unsigned long timeslice;
+		int i, err = 0;
+		u32 *slot;
+
+		if (!intel_engine_has_timeslices(engine))
+			continue;
+
+		/*
+		 * A:rq1 -- semaphore wait, timestamp X
+		 * A:rq2 -- write timestamp Y
+		 *
+		 * B:rq1 [await A:rq1] -- write timestamp Z
+		 *
+		 * Force timeslice, release semaphore.
+		 *
+		 * Expect execution/evaluation order XZY
+		 */
+
+		engine_heartbeat_disable(engine, &heartbeat);
+		timeslice = xchg(&engine->props.timeslice_duration_ms, 1);
+
+		slot = memset32(engine->status_page.addr + 1000, 0, 4);
+
+		ce = intel_context_create(engine);
+		if (IS_ERR(ce)) {
+			err = PTR_ERR(ce);
+			goto err;
+		}
+
+		rq[0] = create_rewinder(ce, NULL, slot, 1);
+		if (IS_ERR(rq[0])) {
+			intel_context_put(ce);
+			goto err;
+		}
+
+		rq[1] = create_rewinder(ce, NULL, slot, 2);
+		intel_context_put(ce);
+		if (IS_ERR(rq[1]))
+			goto err;
+
+		err = wait_for_submit(engine, rq[1], HZ / 2);
+		if (err) {
+			pr_err("%s: failed to submit first context\n",
+			       engine->name);
+			goto err;
+		}
+
+		ce = intel_context_create(engine);
+		if (IS_ERR(ce)) {
+			err = PTR_ERR(ce);
+			goto err;
+		}
+
+		rq[2] = create_rewinder(ce, rq[0], slot, 3);
+		intel_context_put(ce);
+		if (IS_ERR(rq[2]))
+			goto err;
+
+		err = wait_for_submit(engine, rq[2], HZ / 2);
+		if (err) {
+			pr_err("%s: failed to submit second context\n",
+			       engine->name);
+			goto err;
+		}
+		GEM_BUG_ON(!timer_pending(&engine->execlists.timer));
+
+		/* ELSP[] = { { A:rq1, A:rq2 }, { B:rq1 } } */
+		GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_request_is_active(rq[A1]));
+		GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_request_is_active(rq[A2]));
+		GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_request_is_active(rq[B1]));
+
+		/* Wait for the timeslice to kick in */
+		del_timer(&engine->execlists.timer);
+		tasklet_hi_schedule(&engine->execlists.tasklet);
+		intel_engine_flush_submission(engine);
+
+		/* -> ELSP[] = { { A:rq1 }, { B:rq1 } } */
+		GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_request_is_active(rq[A1]));
+		GEM_BUG_ON( i915_request_is_active(rq[A2]));
+		GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_request_is_active(rq[B1]));
+
+		/* Release the hounds! */
+		slot[0] = 1;
+		wmb(); /* "pairs" with GPU; paranoid kick of internal CPU$ */
+
+		for (i = 1; i <= 3; i++) {
+			unsigned long timeout = jiffies + HZ / 2;
+
+			while (!READ_ONCE(slot[i]) &&
+			       time_before(jiffies, timeout))
+				;
+
+			if (!time_before(jiffies, timeout)) {
+				pr_err("%s: rq[%d] timed out\n",
+				       engine->name, i - 1);
+				err = -ETIME;
+				goto err;
+			}
+
+			pr_debug("%s: slot[%d]:%x\n", engine->name, i, slot[i]);
+		}
+
+		/* XZY: XZ < XY */
+		if (slot[Z] - slot[X] >= slot[Y] - slot[X]) {
+			pr_err("%s: timeslicing did not run context B [%u] before A [%u]!\n",
+			       engine->name,
+			       slot[Z] - slot[X],
+			       slot[Y] - slot[X]);
+			err = -EINVAL;
+		}
+
+err:
+		memset32(&slot[0], -1, 4);
+		wmb();
+
+		engine->props.timeslice_duration_ms = timeslice;
+		engine_heartbeat_enable(engine, heartbeat);
+		for (i = 0; i < 3; i++)
+			i915_request_put(rq[i]);
+		if (igt_flush_test(gt->i915))
+			err = -EIO;
+		if (err)
+			return err;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static struct i915_request *nop_request(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 {
 	struct i915_request *rq;
@@ -3711,6 +3923,7 @@ int intel_execlists_live_selftests(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
 		SUBTEST(live_hold_reset),
 		SUBTEST(live_error_interrupt),
 		SUBTEST(live_timeslice_preempt),
+		SUBTEST(live_timeslice_rewind),
 		SUBTEST(live_timeslice_queue),
 		SUBTEST(live_busywait_preempt),
 		SUBTEST(live_preempt),
-- 
2.25.0

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

             reply	other threads:[~2020-02-13 14:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-13 14:01 Chris Wilson [this message]
2020-02-13 16:11 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/selftests: Exercise timeslice rewinding (rev2) Patchwork
2020-02-13 16:34 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-02-17 11:09 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200213140150.3639027-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --to=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.