From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16FC1C2BA83 for ; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 16:06:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED2BF2073C for ; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 16:06:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730383AbgBMQG3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Feb 2020 11:06:29 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:60120 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725781AbgBMQGV (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Feb 2020 11:06:21 -0500 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7368ACD7; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 16:06:20 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 07:55:20 -0800 From: Davidlohr Bueso To: Mark Brown Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mcgrof@kernel.org, alex.williamson@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 0/5] rbtree: optimize frequent tree walks Message-ID: <20200213155520.bd332lzo4py27o5k@linux-p48b> References: <20200207180305.11092-1-dave@stgolabs.net> <20200209174632.9c7b6ff20567853c05e5ee58@linux-foundation.org> <20200210155611.lfrddnolsyzktqne@linux-p48b> <20200211112015.GA4543@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200211112015.GA4543@sirena.org.uk> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 11 Feb 2020, Mark Brown wrote: >As I said in reply to the regmap patch I'm really unconvinced that any >benefit will outweigh the increased memory costs for that usage. I'm not arguing the regmap case; if it's not worth it it's not worth it. With that conversion I was merely hoping that sync was used enough for it to be considered. Thanks, Davidlohr