From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2B72C2BA83 for ; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 08:37:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86C9B222C2 for ; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 08:37:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alien8.de header.i=@alien8.de header.b="PPgSmn4x" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728829AbgBNIha (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Feb 2020 03:37:30 -0500 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:60082 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725938AbgBNIha (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Feb 2020 03:37:30 -0500 Received: from zn.tnic (p200300EC2F0D5A00F0C2F03C7F1C4548.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2f0d:5a00:f0c2:f03c:7f1c:4548]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id 59F261EC0CED; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 09:37:28 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1581669448; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=bQ+pNAR45micF63heSSUE4/LAB3cGnDZZ8BPobmbcEI=; b=PPgSmn4xqc5wyRg8pgqbp/N6jlwCU0QE0KRPpGkzPpnJiIV+goQ3a2wR5L9McOP+HCKna5 h3f3QPqAY2lZKsBJSuuCRvmld/bbxyZyUhSgY9cQFvoLSjR4ll+l/Ygqogq5iUIL3sOCII GByucSvw3ipsvmT0WDc5I6gxHDAzh50= Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 09:37:23 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: Dan Carpenter Cc: Tony Luck , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , x86@kernel.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, Saar Amar , "security@kernel.org" Subject: [PATCH] x86/mce/amd: Publish the bank pointer only after setup has succeeded Message-ID: <20200214083723.GB13395@zn.tnic> References: <20190813100752.GM1935@kadam> <20200128140846.phctkvx5btiexvbx@kili.mountain> <20200204133638.GA19863@zn.tnic> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200204133638.GA19863@zn.tnic> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-edac-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-edac@vger.kernel.org Now as a proper, tested patch: --- From: Borislav Petkov threshold_create_bank() creates a bank descriptor per MCA error thresholding counter which can be controlled over sysfs. It publishes the pointer to that bank in a per-CPU variable and then goes on to create additional thresholding blocks if the bank has such. However, that creation of additional blocks in allocate_threshold_blocks() can fail, leading to a use-after-free through the per-CPU pointer. Therefore, publish that pointer only after all blocks have been setup successfully. Fixes: 019f34fccfd5 ("x86, MCE, AMD: Move shared bank to node descriptor") Reported-by: Saar Amar Reported-by: Dan Carpenter Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov Cc: Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200128140846.phctkvx5btiexvbx@kili.mountain --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/amd.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++----------------- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/amd.c index b3a50d962851..e7313e5c497c 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/amd.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/amd.c @@ -1198,8 +1198,9 @@ static const char *get_name(unsigned int bank, struct threshold_block *b) return buf_mcatype; } -static int allocate_threshold_blocks(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int bank, - unsigned int block, u32 address) +static int allocate_threshold_blocks(unsigned int cpu, struct threshold_bank *tb, + unsigned int bank, unsigned int block, + u32 address) { struct threshold_block *b = NULL; u32 low, high; @@ -1243,16 +1244,12 @@ static int allocate_threshold_blocks(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int bank, INIT_LIST_HEAD(&b->miscj); - if (per_cpu(threshold_banks, cpu)[bank]->blocks) { - list_add(&b->miscj, - &per_cpu(threshold_banks, cpu)[bank]->blocks->miscj); - } else { - per_cpu(threshold_banks, cpu)[bank]->blocks = b; - } + if (tb->blocks) + list_add(&b->miscj, &tb->blocks->miscj); + else + tb->blocks = b; - err = kobject_init_and_add(&b->kobj, &threshold_ktype, - per_cpu(threshold_banks, cpu)[bank]->kobj, - get_name(bank, b)); + err = kobject_init_and_add(&b->kobj, &threshold_ktype, tb->kobj, get_name(bank, b)); if (err) goto out_free; recurse: @@ -1260,7 +1257,7 @@ static int allocate_threshold_blocks(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int bank, if (!address) return 0; - err = allocate_threshold_blocks(cpu, bank, block, address); + err = allocate_threshold_blocks(cpu, tb, bank, block, address); if (err) goto out_free; @@ -1345,8 +1342,6 @@ static int threshold_create_bank(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int bank) goto out_free; } - per_cpu(threshold_banks, cpu)[bank] = b; - if (is_shared_bank(bank)) { refcount_set(&b->cpus, 1); @@ -1357,9 +1352,13 @@ static int threshold_create_bank(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int bank) } } - err = allocate_threshold_blocks(cpu, bank, 0, msr_ops.misc(bank)); - if (!err) - goto out; + err = allocate_threshold_blocks(cpu, b, bank, 0, msr_ops.misc(bank)); + if (err) + goto out_free; + + per_cpu(threshold_banks, cpu)[bank] = b; + + return 0; out_free: kfree(b); -- 2.21.0 -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette