From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Don't declare __force_order in kaslr_64.c
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 11:45:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200218104552.GA14449@zn.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMe9rOrtj-Hrr6tmSrwg_V9bawXXB2WjsSedL=aCaaH-=ZSKsA@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 10:44:30AM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
> This updated patch fixed a typo in Subject: "care" -> "declare".
>
> From c8c26194cf5a344cd53763eaaf16c3ab609736f4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 12:46:51 -0800
> Subject: [PATCH] x86: Don't declare __force_order in kaslr_64.c
>
> GCC 10 changed the default to -fno-common, which leads to
>
> LD arch/x86/boot/compressed/vmlinux
> ld: arch/x86/boot/compressed/pgtable_64.o:(.bss+0x0): multiple definition of `__force_order'; arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr_64.o:(.bss+0x0): first defined here
> make[2]: *** [arch/x86/boot/compressed/Makefile:119: arch/x86/boot/compressed/vmlinux] Error 1
>
> Since __force_order is already provided in pgtable_64.c, there is no
> need to declare __force_order in kaslr_64.c.
>
> Signed-off-by: H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>
What is Yu-cheng's SOB supposed to mean here?
The only case where it would make sense is if he's sending this patch
but he isn't. So what's up?
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-18 10:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-24 18:18 [PATCH] x86: Don't clare __force_order in kaslr_64.c H.J. Lu
2020-01-24 18:24 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-01-24 18:39 ` H.J. Lu
2020-01-24 18:44 ` [PATCH] x86: Don't declare " H.J. Lu
2020-02-18 10:45 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2020-02-18 11:38 ` H.J. Lu
2020-02-18 13:37 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-02-17 22:27 ` [PATCH] x86: Don't clare " Borislav Petkov
2020-02-18 15:07 ` [tip: x86/boot] x86/boot/compressed: Don't declare " tip-bot2 for H.J. Lu
2020-02-19 16:32 ` [tip: x86/urgent] " tip-bot2 for H.J. Lu
2020-02-18 14:00 [PATCH] x86: " H.J. Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200218104552.GA14449@zn.tnic \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yu-cheng.yu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.