From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16738C34026 for ; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 13:38:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEE2A2173E for ; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 13:38:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alien8.de header.i=@alien8.de header.b="dYjV/1Hj" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726683AbgBRNiB (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Feb 2020 08:38:01 -0500 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:56176 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726347AbgBRNiB (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Feb 2020 08:38:01 -0500 Received: from zn.tnic (p200300EC2F0C1F0028FD4265E0CDE335.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2f0c:1f00:28fd:4265:e0cd:e335]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id 0E70B1EC0CD1; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 14:38:00 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1582033080; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=3fEGQmlRrx7Ve1nJ21t9s4LB01DniXaNSXB1qQeQEOk=; b=dYjV/1HjQgoWDktIVXa9DVTBajaxdUS/8ISqM4yublqc3UXsUzugiyrpGNwZV/1KMn49Rp jz7wPaRvqKPStP/ZXlncUaBypSNv2NTa5dhFiwCyzEMLg0cC/AebNBbmgizaqOH0UB4280 ZJC61b3E3Zeof9bkHlPU+rTO3sSJOhE= Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 14:37:56 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: "H.J. Lu" Cc: Andy Lutomirski , LKML , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H . Peter Anvin" , the arch/x86 maintainers , Yu-cheng Yu Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Don't declare __force_order in kaslr_64.c Message-ID: <20200218133756.GD14449@zn.tnic> References: <20200124181811.4780-1-hjl.tools@gmail.com> <20200218104552.GA14449@zn.tnic> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 03:38:54AM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote: > I wrote this patch as the part of the previous CET patch set Yu-cheng submitted. > Since this is a standalone patch, he asked me to send it separately. I didn't > remove Yu-cheng's SOB when I submitted this patch. Ok, dropping it. Thx. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette