All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v4 00/16] s390x: Protected Virtualization support
@ 2020-02-20 12:56 Janosch Frank
  2020-02-20 12:56 ` [PATCH v4 01/16] Sync pv Janosch Frank
                   ` (15 more replies)
  0 siblings, 16 replies; 32+ messages in thread
From: Janosch Frank @ 2020-02-20 12:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qemu-devel; +Cc: qemu-s390x, mihajlov, david, cohuck

Most of the QEMU changes for PV are related to the new IPL type with
subcodes 8 - 10 and the execution of the necessary Ultravisor calls to
IPL secure guests. Note that we can only boot into secure mode from
normal mode, i.e. stfle 161 is not active in secure mode.

The other changes related to data gathering for emulation and
disabling addressing checks in secure mode, as well as CPU resets.

v4:
	* Dropped reset patches which are already picked up
	* Sync with KVM changes
	* Review changes

V3:
	* Use dedicated functions to access SIDA
	* Smaller cleanups and segfault fixes
	* Error reporting for Ultravisor calls
	* Inject of RC of diag308 subcode 10 fails

V2:
	* Split out cleanups
	* Internal PV state tracking
	* Review feedback


Christian Borntraeger (1):
  s390x: Add unpack feature to GA1

Janosch Frank (15):
  Sync pv
  s390x: protvirt: Add diag308 subcodes 8 - 10
  s390x: protvirt: Support unpack facility
  s390x: protvirt: Add migration blocker
  s390x: protvirt: Handle diag 308 subcodes 0,1,3,4
  s390x: protvirt: KVM intercept changes
  s390x: Add SIDA memory ops
  s390x: protvirt: Move STSI data over SIDAD
  s390x: protvirt: SCLP interpretation
  s390x: protvirt: Set guest IPL PSW
  s390x: protvirt: Move diag 308 data over SIDAD
  s390x: protvirt: Disable address checks for PV guest IO emulation
  s390x: protvirt: Move IO control structures over SIDA
  s390x: protvirt: Handle SIGP store status correctly
  docs: Add protvirt docs

 docs/protvirt.rst                   |  53 +++++++++++
 hw/s390x/Makefile.objs              |   1 +
 hw/s390x/ipl.c                      |  81 ++++++++++++++++-
 hw/s390x/ipl.h                      |  33 +++++++
 hw/s390x/pv.c                       | 106 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 hw/s390x/pv.h                       |  34 +++++++
 hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c          | 135 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 hw/s390x/sclp.c                     |  17 ++++
 include/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.h  |   1 +
 include/hw/s390x/sclp.h             |   2 +
 linux-headers/linux/kvm.h           |  48 +++++++++-
 target/s390x/cpu.c                  |  27 ++++--
 target/s390x/cpu.h                  |   8 +-
 target/s390x/cpu_features_def.inc.h |   1 +
 target/s390x/diag.c                 |  61 ++++++++++---
 target/s390x/gen-features.c         |   1 +
 target/s390x/helper.c               |   4 +
 target/s390x/ioinst.c               | 113 ++++++++++++++++-------
 target/s390x/kvm.c                  |  54 ++++++++++-
 target/s390x/kvm_s390x.h            |   2 +
 target/s390x/mmu_helper.c           |   9 ++
 target/s390x/sigp.c                 |   1 +
 22 files changed, 726 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 docs/protvirt.rst
 create mode 100644 hw/s390x/pv.c
 create mode 100644 hw/s390x/pv.h

-- 
2.20.1



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 01/16] Sync pv
  2020-02-20 12:56 [PATCH v4 00/16] s390x: Protected Virtualization support Janosch Frank
@ 2020-02-20 12:56 ` Janosch Frank
  2020-02-25  9:42   ` David Hildenbrand
  2020-02-20 12:56 ` [PATCH v4 02/16] s390x: protvirt: Add diag308 subcodes 8 - 10 Janosch Frank
                   ` (14 subsequent siblings)
  15 siblings, 1 reply; 32+ messages in thread
From: Janosch Frank @ 2020-02-20 12:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qemu-devel; +Cc: qemu-s390x, mihajlov, david, cohuck

Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
---
 linux-headers/linux/kvm.h | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/linux-headers/linux/kvm.h b/linux-headers/linux/kvm.h
index ec146bd52a..2e647f2d9b 100644
--- a/linux-headers/linux/kvm.h
+++ b/linux-headers/linux/kvm.h
@@ -474,8 +474,11 @@ struct kvm_s390_mem_op {
 	__u32 size;		/* amount of bytes */
 	__u32 op;		/* type of operation */
 	__u64 buf;		/* buffer in userspace */
-	__u8 ar;		/* the access register number */
-	__u8 reserved[31];	/* should be set to 0 */
+	union {
+		__u8 ar;	/* the access register number */
+		__u32 sida_offset; /* offset into the sida */
+		__u8 reserved[32]; /* should be set to 0 */
+	};
 };
 /* types for kvm_s390_mem_op->op */
 #define KVM_S390_MEMOP_LOGICAL_READ	0
@@ -1010,6 +1013,7 @@ struct kvm_ppc_resize_hpt {
 #define KVM_CAP_ARM_NISV_TO_USER 177
 #define KVM_CAP_ARM_INJECT_EXT_DABT 178
 #define KVM_CAP_S390_VCPU_RESETS 179
+#define KVM_CAP_S390_PROTECTED 180
 
 #ifdef KVM_CAP_IRQ_ROUTING
 
@@ -1474,8 +1478,42 @@ struct kvm_enc_region {
 /* Available with KVM_CAP_ARM_SVE */
 #define KVM_ARM_VCPU_FINALIZE	  _IOW(KVMIO,  0xc2, int)
 
-#define KVM_S390_NORMAL_RESET	  _IO(KVMIO,  0xc3)
-#define KVM_S390_CLEAR_RESET	  _IO(KVMIO,  0xc4)
+/* Available with  KVM_CAP_S390_VCPU_RESETS */
+#define KVM_S390_NORMAL_RESET	_IO(KVMIO,   0xc3)
+#define KVM_S390_CLEAR_RESET	_IO(KVMIO,   0xc4)
+
+struct kvm_s390_pv_sec_parm {
+	__u64 origin;
+	__u64 length;
+};
+
+struct kvm_s390_pv_unp {
+	__u64 addr;
+	__u64 size;
+	__u64 tweak;
+};
+
+enum pv_cmd_id {
+	KVM_PV_ENABLE,
+	KVM_PV_DISABLE,
+	KVM_PV_VM_SET_SEC_PARMS,
+	KVM_PV_VM_UNPACK,
+	KVM_PV_VM_VERIFY,
+	KVM_PV_VM_PREP_RESET,
+	KVM_PV_VM_UNSHARE_ALL,
+};
+
+struct kvm_pv_cmd {
+	__u32 cmd;	/* Command to be executed */
+	__u16 rc;	/* Ultravisor return code */
+	__u16 rrc;	/* Ultravisor return reason code */
+	__u64 data;	/* Data or address */
+	__u32 flags;    /* flags for future extensions. Must be 0 for now */
+	__u32 reserved[3];
+};
+
+/* Available with KVM_CAP_S390_PROTECTED */
+#define KVM_S390_PV_COMMAND		_IOWR(KVMIO, 0xc5, struct kvm_pv_cmd)
 
 /* Secure Encrypted Virtualization command */
 enum sev_cmd_id {
-- 
2.20.1



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 02/16] s390x: protvirt: Add diag308 subcodes 8 - 10
  2020-02-20 12:56 [PATCH v4 00/16] s390x: Protected Virtualization support Janosch Frank
  2020-02-20 12:56 ` [PATCH v4 01/16] Sync pv Janosch Frank
@ 2020-02-20 12:56 ` Janosch Frank
  2020-02-21  9:49   ` Cornelia Huck
  2020-02-20 12:56 ` [PATCH v4 03/16] s390x: protvirt: Support unpack facility Janosch Frank
                   ` (13 subsequent siblings)
  15 siblings, 1 reply; 32+ messages in thread
From: Janosch Frank @ 2020-02-20 12:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qemu-devel; +Cc: qemu-s390x, mihajlov, david, cohuck

For diag308 subcodes 8 - 10 we have a new ipib of type 5. The ipib
holds the address and length of the secure execution header, as well
as a list of guest components.

Each component is a block of memory, for example kernel or initrd,
which needs to be decrypted by the Ultravisor in order to run a
protected VM. The secure execution header instructs the Ultravisor on
how to handle the protected VM and its components.

Subcodes 8 and 9 are similiar to 5 and 6 and subcode 10 will finally
start the protected guest.

Subcodes 8-10 are not valid in protected mode, we have to do a subcode
3 and then the 8 and 10 combination for a protected reboot.

Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
---
 hw/s390x/ipl.c      | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 hw/s390x/ipl.h      | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 target/s390x/diag.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++---
 3 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/s390x/ipl.c b/hw/s390x/ipl.c
index 7773499d7f..e92d989813 100644
--- a/hw/s390x/ipl.c
+++ b/hw/s390x/ipl.c
@@ -538,15 +538,56 @@ static bool is_virtio_scsi_device(IplParameterBlock *iplb)
     return is_virtio_ccw_device_of_type(iplb, VIRTIO_ID_SCSI);
 }
 
+int s390_ipl_pv_check_components(IplParameterBlock *iplb)
+{
+    int i;
+    IPLBlockPV *ipib_pv = &iplb->pv;
+
+    if (ipib_pv->num_comp == 0) {
+        return -EINVAL;
+    }
+
+    for (i = 0; i < ipib_pv->num_comp; i++) {
+
+        /* Addr must be 4k aligned */
+        if (ipib_pv->components[i].addr & ~TARGET_PAGE_MASK) {
+            return -EINVAL;
+        }
+
+        /* Tweak prefix is monotonously increasing with each component */
+        if (i < ipib_pv->num_comp - 1 &&
+            ipib_pv->components[i].tweak_pref >
+            ipib_pv->components[i + 1].tweak_pref) {
+            return -EINVAL;
+        }
+    }
+    return 1;
+}
+
 void s390_ipl_update_diag308(IplParameterBlock *iplb)
 {
     S390IPLState *ipl = get_ipl_device();
 
-    ipl->iplb = *iplb;
-    ipl->iplb_valid = true;
+    if (iplb->pbt == S390_IPL_TYPE_PV) {
+        ipl->iplb_pv = *iplb;
+        ipl->iplb_valid_pv = true;
+    } else {
+        ipl->iplb = *iplb;
+        ipl->iplb_valid = true;
+    }
     ipl->netboot = is_virtio_net_device(iplb);
 }
 
+IplParameterBlock *s390_ipl_get_iplb_secure(void)
+{
+    S390IPLState *ipl = get_ipl_device();
+
+    if (!ipl->iplb_valid_pv) {
+        return NULL;
+    }
+    return &ipl->iplb_pv;
+}
+
 IplParameterBlock *s390_ipl_get_iplb(void)
 {
     S390IPLState *ipl = get_ipl_device();
@@ -561,7 +602,8 @@ void s390_ipl_reset_request(CPUState *cs, enum s390_reset reset_type)
 {
     S390IPLState *ipl = get_ipl_device();
 
-    if (reset_type == S390_RESET_EXTERNAL || reset_type == S390_RESET_REIPL) {
+    if (reset_type == S390_RESET_EXTERNAL || reset_type == S390_RESET_REIPL ||
+        reset_type == S390_RESET_PV) {
         /* use CPU 0 for full resets */
         ipl->reset_cpu_index = 0;
     } else {
diff --git a/hw/s390x/ipl.h b/hw/s390x/ipl.h
index d4813105db..3c4bb66eda 100644
--- a/hw/s390x/ipl.h
+++ b/hw/s390x/ipl.h
@@ -15,6 +15,23 @@
 #include "cpu.h"
 #include "hw/qdev-core.h"
 
+struct IPLBlockPVComp {
+    uint64_t tweak_pref;
+    uint64_t addr;
+    uint64_t size;
+} QEMU_PACKED;
+typedef struct IPLBlockPVComp IPLBlockPVComp;
+
+struct IPLBlockPV {
+    uint8_t  reserved[87];
+    uint8_t  version;
+    uint32_t num_comp;
+    uint64_t pv_header_addr;
+    uint64_t pv_header_len;
+    struct IPLBlockPVComp components[];
+} QEMU_PACKED;
+typedef struct IPLBlockPV IPLBlockPV;
+
 struct IplBlockCcw {
     uint8_t  reserved0[85];
     uint8_t  ssid;
@@ -71,6 +88,7 @@ union IplParameterBlock {
         union {
             IplBlockCcw ccw;
             IplBlockFcp fcp;
+            IPLBlockPV pv;
             IplBlockQemuScsi scsi;
         };
     } QEMU_PACKED;
@@ -84,9 +102,11 @@ union IplParameterBlock {
 typedef union IplParameterBlock IplParameterBlock;
 
 int s390_ipl_set_loadparm(uint8_t *loadparm);
+int s390_ipl_pv_check_components(IplParameterBlock *iplb);
 void s390_ipl_update_diag308(IplParameterBlock *iplb);
 void s390_ipl_prepare_cpu(S390CPU *cpu);
 IplParameterBlock *s390_ipl_get_iplb(void);
+IplParameterBlock *s390_ipl_get_iplb_secure(void);
 
 enum s390_reset {
     /* default is a reset not triggered by a CPU e.g. issued by QMP */
@@ -94,6 +114,7 @@ enum s390_reset {
     S390_RESET_REIPL,
     S390_RESET_MODIFIED_CLEAR,
     S390_RESET_LOAD_NORMAL,
+    S390_RESET_PV,
 };
 void s390_ipl_reset_request(CPUState *cs, enum s390_reset reset_type);
 void s390_ipl_get_reset_request(CPUState **cs, enum s390_reset *reset_type);
@@ -133,6 +154,7 @@ struct S390IPLState {
     /*< private >*/
     DeviceState parent_obj;
     IplParameterBlock iplb;
+    IplParameterBlock iplb_pv;
     QemuIplParameters qipl;
     uint64_t start_addr;
     uint64_t compat_start_addr;
@@ -140,6 +162,7 @@ struct S390IPLState {
     uint64_t compat_bios_start_addr;
     bool enforce_bios;
     bool iplb_valid;
+    bool iplb_valid_pv;
     bool netboot;
     /* reset related properties don't have to be migrated or reset */
     enum s390_reset reset_type;
@@ -161,9 +184,11 @@ QEMU_BUILD_BUG_MSG(offsetof(S390IPLState, iplb) & 3, "alignment of iplb wrong");
 
 #define S390_IPL_TYPE_FCP 0x00
 #define S390_IPL_TYPE_CCW 0x02
+#define S390_IPL_TYPE_PV 0x05
 #define S390_IPL_TYPE_QEMU_SCSI 0xff
 
 #define S390_IPLB_HEADER_LEN 8
+#define S390_IPLB_MIN_PV_LEN 148
 #define S390_IPLB_MIN_CCW_LEN 200
 #define S390_IPLB_MIN_FCP_LEN 384
 #define S390_IPLB_MIN_QEMU_SCSI_LEN 200
@@ -185,4 +210,10 @@ static inline bool iplb_valid_fcp(IplParameterBlock *iplb)
            iplb->pbt == S390_IPL_TYPE_FCP;
 }
 
+static inline bool iplb_valid_pv(IplParameterBlock *iplb)
+{
+    return be32_to_cpu(iplb->len) >= S390_IPLB_MIN_PV_LEN &&
+           iplb->pbt == S390_IPL_TYPE_PV;
+}
+
 #endif
diff --git a/target/s390x/diag.c b/target/s390x/diag.c
index b5aec06d6b..5e77d85652 100644
--- a/target/s390x/diag.c
+++ b/target/s390x/diag.c
@@ -52,6 +52,8 @@ int handle_diag_288(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t r1, uint64_t r3)
 #define DIAG_308_RC_OK              0x0001
 #define DIAG_308_RC_NO_CONF         0x0102
 #define DIAG_308_RC_INVALID         0x0402
+#define DIAG_308_RC_NO_PV_CONF      0x0a02
+#define DIAG_308_RC_INVAL_FOR_PV    0x0b02
 
 #define DIAG308_RESET_MOD_CLR       0
 #define DIAG308_RESET_LOAD_NORM     1
@@ -59,6 +61,9 @@ int handle_diag_288(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t r1, uint64_t r3)
 #define DIAG308_LOAD_NORMAL_DUMP    4
 #define DIAG308_SET                 5
 #define DIAG308_STORE               6
+#define DIAG308_PV_SET              8
+#define DIAG308_PV_STORE            9
+#define DIAG308_PV_START            10
 
 static int diag308_parm_check(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t r1, uint64_t addr,
                               uintptr_t ra, bool write)
@@ -105,6 +110,7 @@ void handle_diag_308(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t r1, uint64_t r3, uintptr_t ra)
         s390_ipl_reset_request(cs, S390_RESET_REIPL);
         break;
     case DIAG308_SET:
+    case DIAG308_PV_SET:
         if (diag308_parm_check(env, r1, addr, ra, false)) {
             return;
         }
@@ -117,7 +123,8 @@ void handle_diag_308(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t r1, uint64_t r3, uintptr_t ra)
 
         cpu_physical_memory_read(addr, iplb, be32_to_cpu(iplb->len));
 
-        if (!iplb_valid_ccw(iplb) && !iplb_valid_fcp(iplb)) {
+        if (!iplb_valid_ccw(iplb) && !iplb_valid_fcp(iplb) &&
+            !(iplb_valid_pv(iplb) && s390_ipl_pv_check_components(iplb) >= 0)) {
             env->regs[r1 + 1] = DIAG_308_RC_INVALID;
             goto out;
         }
@@ -128,17 +135,31 @@ out:
         g_free(iplb);
         return;
     case DIAG308_STORE:
+    case DIAG308_PV_STORE:
         if (diag308_parm_check(env, r1, addr, ra, true)) {
             return;
         }
-        iplb = s390_ipl_get_iplb();
+        if (subcode == DIAG308_PV_STORE) {
+            iplb = s390_ipl_get_iplb_secure();
+        } else {
+            iplb = s390_ipl_get_iplb();
+        }
         if (iplb) {
             cpu_physical_memory_write(addr, iplb, be32_to_cpu(iplb->len));
             env->regs[r1 + 1] = DIAG_308_RC_OK;
         } else {
             env->regs[r1 + 1] = DIAG_308_RC_NO_CONF;
         }
-        return;
+        break;
+    case DIAG308_PV_START:
+        iplb = s390_ipl_get_iplb_secure();
+        if (!iplb || !iplb_valid_pv(iplb)) {
+            env->regs[r1 + 1] = DIAG_308_RC_NO_PV_CONF;
+            return;
+        }
+
+        s390_ipl_reset_request(cs, S390_RESET_PV);
+        break;
     default:
         s390_program_interrupt(env, PGM_SPECIFICATION, ra);
         break;
-- 
2.20.1



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 03/16] s390x: protvirt: Support unpack facility
  2020-02-20 12:56 [PATCH v4 00/16] s390x: Protected Virtualization support Janosch Frank
  2020-02-20 12:56 ` [PATCH v4 01/16] Sync pv Janosch Frank
  2020-02-20 12:56 ` [PATCH v4 02/16] s390x: protvirt: Add diag308 subcodes 8 - 10 Janosch Frank
@ 2020-02-20 12:56 ` Janosch Frank
  2020-02-24 14:13   ` Christian Borntraeger
  2020-02-20 12:56 ` [PATCH v4 04/16] s390x: protvirt: Add migration blocker Janosch Frank
                   ` (12 subsequent siblings)
  15 siblings, 1 reply; 32+ messages in thread
From: Janosch Frank @ 2020-02-20 12:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qemu-devel; +Cc: qemu-s390x, mihajlov, david, cohuck

When a guest has saved a ipib of type 5 and calls diagnose308 with
subcode 10, we have to setup the protected processing environment via
Ultravisor calls. The calls are done by KVM and are exposed via an
API.

The following steps are necessary:
1. Create a VM (register it with the Ultravisor)
2. Create secure CPUs for all of our current cpus
3. Forward the secure header to the Ultravisor (has all information on
how to decrypt the image and VM information)
4. Protect image pages from the host and decrypt them
5. Verify the image integrity

Only after step 5 a protected VM is allowed to run.

Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> [Changes
to machine]
---
 hw/s390x/Makefile.objs              |   1 +
 hw/s390x/ipl.c                      |  33 +++++++++
 hw/s390x/ipl.h                      |   2 +
 hw/s390x/pv.c                       | 106 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 hw/s390x/pv.h                       |  34 +++++++++
 hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c          |  87 +++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.h  |   1 +
 target/s390x/cpu.c                  |   4 ++
 target/s390x/cpu.h                  |   1 +
 target/s390x/cpu_features_def.inc.h |   1 +
 10 files changed, 270 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 hw/s390x/pv.c
 create mode 100644 hw/s390x/pv.h

diff --git a/hw/s390x/Makefile.objs b/hw/s390x/Makefile.objs
index e02ed80b68..a46a1c7894 100644
--- a/hw/s390x/Makefile.objs
+++ b/hw/s390x/Makefile.objs
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ obj-y += tod-qemu.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_KVM) += tod-kvm.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_KVM) += s390-skeys-kvm.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_KVM) += s390-stattrib-kvm.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_KVM) += pv.o
 obj-y += s390-ccw.o
 obj-y += ap-device.o
 obj-y += ap-bridge.o
diff --git a/hw/s390x/ipl.c b/hw/s390x/ipl.c
index e92d989813..7c27f50e13 100644
--- a/hw/s390x/ipl.c
+++ b/hw/s390x/ipl.c
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
 #include "qemu/cutils.h"
 #include "qemu/option.h"
 #include "exec/exec-all.h"
+#include "pv.h"
 
 #define KERN_IMAGE_START                0x010000UL
 #define LINUX_MAGIC_ADDR                0x010008UL
@@ -677,6 +678,38 @@ static void s390_ipl_prepare_qipl(S390CPU *cpu)
     cpu_physical_memory_unmap(addr, len, 1, len);
 }
 
+int s390_ipl_prepare_pv_header(void)
+{
+    S390IPLState *ipl = get_ipl_device();
+    IPLBlockPV *ipib_pv = &ipl->iplb_pv.pv;
+    void *hdr = g_malloc(ipib_pv->pv_header_len);
+    int rc;
+
+    cpu_physical_memory_read(ipib_pv->pv_header_addr, hdr,
+                             ipib_pv->pv_header_len);
+    rc = s390_pv_set_sec_parms((uint64_t)hdr,
+                          ipib_pv->pv_header_len);
+    g_free(hdr);
+    return rc;
+}
+
+int s390_ipl_pv_unpack(void)
+{
+    int i, rc = 0;
+    S390IPLState *ipl = get_ipl_device();
+    IPLBlockPV *ipib_pv = &ipl->iplb_pv.pv;
+
+    for (i = 0; i < ipib_pv->num_comp; i++) {
+        rc = s390_pv_unpack(ipib_pv->components[i].addr,
+                            TARGET_PAGE_ALIGN(ipib_pv->components[i].size),
+                            ipib_pv->components[i].tweak_pref);
+        if (rc) {
+            break;
+        }
+    }
+    return rc;
+}
+
 void s390_ipl_prepare_cpu(S390CPU *cpu)
 {
     S390IPLState *ipl = get_ipl_device();
diff --git a/hw/s390x/ipl.h b/hw/s390x/ipl.h
index 3c4bb66eda..92467738a7 100644
--- a/hw/s390x/ipl.h
+++ b/hw/s390x/ipl.h
@@ -104,6 +104,8 @@ typedef union IplParameterBlock IplParameterBlock;
 int s390_ipl_set_loadparm(uint8_t *loadparm);
 int s390_ipl_pv_check_components(IplParameterBlock *iplb);
 void s390_ipl_update_diag308(IplParameterBlock *iplb);
+int s390_ipl_prepare_pv_header(void);
+int s390_ipl_pv_unpack(void);
 void s390_ipl_prepare_cpu(S390CPU *cpu);
 IplParameterBlock *s390_ipl_get_iplb(void);
 IplParameterBlock *s390_ipl_get_iplb_secure(void);
diff --git a/hw/s390x/pv.c b/hw/s390x/pv.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..8ae20f31c1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/hw/s390x/pv.c
@@ -0,0 +1,106 @@
+/*
+ * Secure execution functions
+ *
+ * Copyright IBM Corp. 2020
+ * Author(s):
+ *  Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
+ *
+ * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2 or (at
+ * your option) any later version. See the COPYING file in the top-level
+ * directory.
+ */
+#include "qemu/osdep.h"
+#include <sys/ioctl.h>
+
+#include <linux/kvm.h>
+
+#include "qemu/error-report.h"
+#include "sysemu/kvm.h"
+#include "pv.h"
+
+const char *cmd_names[] = {
+    "VM_CREATE",
+    "VM_DESTROY",
+    "VM_SET_SEC_PARAMS",
+    "VM_UNPACK",
+    "VM_VERIFY",
+    "VM_PREP_RESET",
+    "VM_UNSHARE_ALL",
+    NULL
+};
+
+static int s390_pv_cmd(uint32_t cmd, void *data)
+{
+    int rc;
+    struct kvm_pv_cmd pv_cmd = {
+        .cmd = cmd,
+        .data = (uint64_t)data,
+    };
+
+    rc = kvm_vm_ioctl(kvm_state, KVM_S390_PV_COMMAND, &pv_cmd);
+    if (rc) {
+        error_report("KVM PV command %d (%s) failed: header rc %x rrc %x "
+                     "IOCTL rc: %d", cmd, cmd_names[cmd], pv_cmd.rc, pv_cmd.rrc,
+                     rc);
+    }
+    return rc;
+}
+
+static void s390_pv_cmd_exit(uint32_t cmd, void *data)
+{
+    int rc;
+
+    rc = s390_pv_cmd(cmd, data);
+    if (rc) {
+        exit(1);
+    }
+}
+
+int s390_pv_vm_create(void)
+{
+    return s390_pv_cmd(KVM_PV_ENABLE, NULL);
+}
+
+void s390_pv_vm_destroy(void)
+{
+     s390_pv_cmd_exit(KVM_PV_DISABLE, NULL);
+}
+
+int s390_pv_set_sec_parms(uint64_t origin, uint64_t length)
+{
+    struct kvm_s390_pv_sec_parm args = {
+        .origin = origin,
+        .length = length,
+    };
+
+    return s390_pv_cmd(KVM_PV_VM_SET_SEC_PARMS, &args);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Called for each component in the SE type IPL parameter block 0.
+ */
+int s390_pv_unpack(uint64_t addr, uint64_t size, uint64_t tweak)
+{
+    struct kvm_s390_pv_unp args = {
+        .addr = addr,
+        .size = size,
+        .tweak = tweak,
+    };
+
+    return s390_pv_cmd(KVM_PV_VM_UNPACK, &args);
+}
+
+void s390_pv_perf_clear_reset(void)
+{
+    s390_pv_cmd_exit(KVM_PV_VM_PREP_RESET, NULL);
+}
+
+int s390_pv_verify(void)
+{
+    return s390_pv_cmd(KVM_PV_VM_VERIFY, NULL);
+}
+
+void s390_pv_unshare(void)
+{
+    s390_pv_cmd_exit(KVM_PV_VM_UNSHARE_ALL, NULL);
+}
diff --git a/hw/s390x/pv.h b/hw/s390x/pv.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..be949d6825
--- /dev/null
+++ b/hw/s390x/pv.h
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+/*
+ * Protected Virtualization header
+ *
+ * Copyright IBM Corp. 2020
+ * Author(s):
+ *  Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
+ *
+ * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2 or (at
+ * your option) any later version. See the COPYING file in the top-level
+ * directory.
+ */
+
+#ifndef HW_S390_PV_H
+#define HW_S390_PV_H
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_KVM
+int s390_pv_vm_create(void);
+void s390_pv_vm_destroy(void);
+int s390_pv_set_sec_parms(uint64_t origin, uint64_t length);
+int s390_pv_unpack(uint64_t addr, uint64_t size, uint64_t tweak);
+void s390_pv_perf_clear_reset(void);
+int s390_pv_verify(void);
+void s390_pv_unshare(void);
+#else
+int s390_pv_vm_create(void) { return 0; }
+void s390_pv_vm_destroy(void) {}
+int s390_pv_set_sec_parms(uint64_t origin, uint64_t length) { return 0; }
+int s390_pv_unpack(uint64_t addr, uint64_t size, uint64_t tweak) { return 0; }
+void s390_pv_perf_clear_reset(void) {}
+int s390_pv_verify(void) { return 0; }
+void s390_pv_unshare(void) {}
+#endif
+
+#endif /* HW_S390_PV_H */
diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
index e759eb5f83..aa974d294e 100644
--- a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
+++ b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
@@ -41,6 +41,7 @@
 #include "hw/qdev-properties.h"
 #include "hw/s390x/tod.h"
 #include "sysemu/sysemu.h"
+#include "hw/s390x/pv.h"
 
 S390CPU *s390_cpu_addr2state(uint16_t cpu_addr)
 {
@@ -240,9 +241,11 @@ static void s390_create_sclpconsole(const char *type, Chardev *chardev)
 static void ccw_init(MachineState *machine)
 {
     int ret;
+    S390CcwMachineState *ms = S390_CCW_MACHINE(machine);
     VirtualCssBus *css_bus;
     DeviceState *dev;
 
+    ms->pv = false;
     s390_sclp_init();
     /* init memory + setup max page size. Required for the CPU model */
     s390_memory_init(machine->ram_size);
@@ -318,10 +321,72 @@ static inline void s390_do_cpu_ipl(CPUState *cs, run_on_cpu_data arg)
     s390_cpu_set_state(S390_CPU_STATE_OPERATING, cpu);
 }
 
+static void s390_machine_unprotect(S390CcwMachineState *ms)
+{
+    CPUState *t;
+
+    s390_pv_vm_destroy();
+    CPU_FOREACH(t) {
+        S390_CPU(t)->env.pv = false;
+    }
+    ms->pv = false;
+}
+
+static int s390_machine_protect(S390CcwMachineState *ms)
+{
+    CPUState *t;
+    int rc;
+
+    /* Create SE VM */
+    rc = s390_pv_vm_create();
+    if (rc) {
+        return rc;
+    }
+
+    CPU_FOREACH(t) {
+        S390_CPU(t)->env.pv = true;
+    }
+    ms->pv = true;
+
+    /* Set SE header and unpack */
+    rc = s390_ipl_prepare_pv_header();
+    if (rc) {
+        goto out_err;
+    }
+
+    /* Decrypt image */
+    rc = s390_ipl_pv_unpack();
+    if (rc) {
+        goto out_err;
+    }
+
+    /* Verify integrity */
+    rc = s390_pv_verify();
+    if (rc) {
+        goto out_err;
+    }
+    return rc;
+
+out_err:
+    s390_machine_unprotect(ms);
+    return rc;
+}
+
+static void s390_machine_inject_pv_error(CPUState *cs)
+{
+    int r1 = (cs->kvm_run->s390_sieic.ipa & 0x00f0) >> 4;
+    CPUS390XState *env = &S390_CPU(cs)->env;
+
+    /* Report that we are unable to enter protected mode */
+    env->regs[r1 + 1] = 0xa02;
+}
+
 static void s390_machine_reset(MachineState *machine)
 {
     enum s390_reset reset_type;
     CPUState *cs, *t;
+    S390CPU *cpu;
+    S390CcwMachineState *ms = S390_CCW_MACHINE(machine);
 
     /* get the reset parameters, reset them once done */
     s390_ipl_get_reset_request(&cs, &reset_type);
@@ -329,6 +394,8 @@ static void s390_machine_reset(MachineState *machine)
     /* all CPUs are paused and synchronized at this point */
     s390_cmma_reset();
 
+    cpu = S390_CPU(cs);
+
     switch (reset_type) {
     case S390_RESET_EXTERNAL:
     case S390_RESET_REIPL:
@@ -355,6 +422,26 @@ static void s390_machine_reset(MachineState *machine)
         }
         subsystem_reset();
         run_on_cpu(cs, s390_do_cpu_initial_reset, RUN_ON_CPU_NULL);
+        run_on_cpu(cs, s390_do_cpu_load_normal, RUN_ON_CPU_NULL);
+        break;
+    case S390_RESET_PV: /* Subcode 10 */
+        subsystem_reset();
+        s390_crypto_reset();
+
+        CPU_FOREACH(t) {
+            if (t == cs) {
+                continue;
+            }
+            run_on_cpu(t, s390_do_cpu_full_reset, RUN_ON_CPU_NULL);
+        }
+        run_on_cpu(cs, s390_do_cpu_reset, RUN_ON_CPU_NULL);
+
+        if (s390_machine_protect(ms)) {
+            s390_machine_inject_pv_error(cs);
+            s390_cpu_set_state(S390_CPU_STATE_OPERATING, cpu);
+            return;
+        }
+
         run_on_cpu(cs, s390_do_cpu_load_normal, RUN_ON_CPU_NULL);
         break;
     default:
diff --git a/include/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.h b/include/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.h
index 8aa27199c9..cd1dccc6e3 100644
--- a/include/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.h
+++ b/include/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.h
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ typedef struct S390CcwMachineState {
     /*< public >*/
     bool aes_key_wrap;
     bool dea_key_wrap;
+    bool pv;
     uint8_t loadparm[8];
 } S390CcwMachineState;
 
diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu.c b/target/s390x/cpu.c
index 8da1905485..1dbd84b9d7 100644
--- a/target/s390x/cpu.c
+++ b/target/s390x/cpu.c
@@ -37,6 +37,8 @@
 #include "sysemu/hw_accel.h"
 #include "hw/qdev-properties.h"
 #ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
+#include "hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.h"
+#include "hw/s390x/pv.h"
 #include "hw/boards.h"
 #include "sysemu/arch_init.h"
 #include "sysemu/sysemu.h"
@@ -191,6 +193,7 @@ static void s390_cpu_realizefn(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
 
 #if !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY)
     MachineState *ms = MACHINE(qdev_get_machine());
+    S390CcwMachineState *ccw = S390_CCW_MACHINE(ms);
     unsigned int max_cpus = ms->smp.max_cpus;
     if (cpu->env.core_id >= max_cpus) {
         error_setg(&err, "Unable to add CPU with core-id: %" PRIu32
@@ -205,6 +208,7 @@ static void s390_cpu_realizefn(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
         goto out;
     }
 
+    cpu->env.pv = ccw->pv;
     /* sync cs->cpu_index and env->core_id. The latter is needed for TCG. */
     cs->cpu_index = cpu->env.core_id;
 #endif
diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu.h b/target/s390x/cpu.h
index 8a557fd8d1..cbc53c99cf 100644
--- a/target/s390x/cpu.h
+++ b/target/s390x/cpu.h
@@ -114,6 +114,7 @@ struct CPUS390XState {
 
     /* Fields up to this point are cleared by a CPU reset */
     struct {} end_reset_fields;
+    bool pv; /* protected virtualization */
 
 #if !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY)
     uint32_t core_id; /* PoP "CPU address", same as cpu_index */
diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu_features_def.inc.h b/target/s390x/cpu_features_def.inc.h
index 31dff0d84e..60db28351d 100644
--- a/target/s390x/cpu_features_def.inc.h
+++ b/target/s390x/cpu_features_def.inc.h
@@ -107,6 +107,7 @@ DEF_FEAT(DEFLATE_BASE, "deflate-base", STFL, 151, "Deflate-conversion facility (
 DEF_FEAT(VECTOR_PACKED_DECIMAL_ENH, "vxpdeh", STFL, 152, "Vector-Packed-Decimal-Enhancement Facility")
 DEF_FEAT(MSA_EXT_9, "msa9-base", STFL, 155, "Message-security-assist-extension-9 facility (excluding subfunctions)")
 DEF_FEAT(ETOKEN, "etoken", STFL, 156, "Etoken facility")
+DEF_FEAT(UNPACK, "unpack", STFL, 161, "Unpack facility")
 
 /* Features exposed via SCLP SCCB Byte 80 - 98  (bit numbers relative to byte-80) */
 DEF_FEAT(SIE_GSLS, "gsls", SCLP_CONF_CHAR, 40, "SIE: Guest-storage-limit-suppression facility")
-- 
2.20.1



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 04/16] s390x: protvirt: Add migration blocker
  2020-02-20 12:56 [PATCH v4 00/16] s390x: Protected Virtualization support Janosch Frank
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-02-20 12:56 ` [PATCH v4 03/16] s390x: protvirt: Support unpack facility Janosch Frank
@ 2020-02-20 12:56 ` Janosch Frank
  2020-02-25  9:50   ` David Hildenbrand
  2020-02-20 12:56 ` [PATCH v4 05/16] s390x: protvirt: Handle diag 308 subcodes 0,1,3,4 Janosch Frank
                   ` (11 subsequent siblings)
  15 siblings, 1 reply; 32+ messages in thread
From: Janosch Frank @ 2020-02-20 12:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qemu-devel; +Cc: qemu-s390x, mihajlov, david, cohuck

Migration is not yet supported.

Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
---
 hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c | 17 ++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
index aa974d294e..6fba8d9331 100644
--- a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
+++ b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
@@ -42,6 +42,9 @@
 #include "hw/s390x/tod.h"
 #include "sysemu/sysemu.h"
 #include "hw/s390x/pv.h"
+#include "migration/blocker.h"
+
+static Error *pv_mig_blocker;
 
 S390CPU *s390_cpu_addr2state(uint16_t cpu_addr)
 {
@@ -387,6 +390,7 @@ static void s390_machine_reset(MachineState *machine)
     CPUState *cs, *t;
     S390CPU *cpu;
     S390CcwMachineState *ms = S390_CCW_MACHINE(machine);
+    static Error *local_err;
 
     /* get the reset parameters, reset them once done */
     s390_ipl_get_reset_request(&cs, &reset_type);
@@ -436,13 +440,20 @@ static void s390_machine_reset(MachineState *machine)
         }
         run_on_cpu(cs, s390_do_cpu_reset, RUN_ON_CPU_NULL);
 
-        if (s390_machine_protect(ms)) {
+        if (!pv_mig_blocker) {
+            error_setg(&pv_mig_blocker,
+                       "protected VMs are currently not migrateable.");
+        }
+        migrate_add_blocker(pv_mig_blocker, &local_err);
+        if (!local_err && s390_machine_protect(ms)) {
             s390_machine_inject_pv_error(cs);
-            s390_cpu_set_state(S390_CPU_STATE_OPERATING, cpu);
-            return;
+            migrate_del_blocker(pv_mig_blocker);
+            goto pv_err;
         }
 
         run_on_cpu(cs, s390_do_cpu_load_normal, RUN_ON_CPU_NULL);
+pv_err:
+        s390_cpu_set_state(S390_CPU_STATE_OPERATING, cpu);
         break;
     default:
         g_assert_not_reached();
-- 
2.20.1



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 05/16] s390x: protvirt: Handle diag 308 subcodes 0,1,3,4
  2020-02-20 12:56 [PATCH v4 00/16] s390x: Protected Virtualization support Janosch Frank
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-02-20 12:56 ` [PATCH v4 04/16] s390x: protvirt: Add migration blocker Janosch Frank
@ 2020-02-20 12:56 ` Janosch Frank
  2020-02-20 12:56 ` [PATCH v4 06/16] s390x: protvirt: KVM intercept changes Janosch Frank
                   ` (10 subsequent siblings)
  15 siblings, 0 replies; 32+ messages in thread
From: Janosch Frank @ 2020-02-20 12:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qemu-devel; +Cc: qemu-s390x, mihajlov, david, cohuck

As we now have access to the protection state of the cpus, we can
implement special handling of diag 308 subcodes for cpus in the
protected state.

For subcodes 0 and 1 we need to unshare all pages before continuing,
so the guest doesn't accidentally expose data when dumping.

For subcode 3/4 we tear down the protected VM and reboot into
unprotected mode. We do not provide a secure reboot.

Before we can do the unshare calls, we need to mark all cpus as
stopped.

Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
---
 hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 target/s390x/diag.c        |  4 ++++
 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
index 6fba8d9331..48dd3170ab 100644
--- a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
+++ b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
@@ -384,6 +384,20 @@ static void s390_machine_inject_pv_error(CPUState *cs)
     env->regs[r1 + 1] = 0xa02;
 }
 
+static void s390_pv_prepare_reset(CPUS390XState *env)
+{
+    CPUState *cs;
+
+    if (!env->pv) {
+        return;
+    }
+    CPU_FOREACH(cs) {
+        s390_cpu_set_state(S390_CPU_STATE_STOPPED, S390_CPU(cs));
+    }
+    s390_pv_unshare();
+    s390_pv_perf_clear_reset();
+}
+
 static void s390_machine_reset(MachineState *machine)
 {
     enum s390_reset reset_type;
@@ -391,6 +405,7 @@ static void s390_machine_reset(MachineState *machine)
     S390CPU *cpu;
     S390CcwMachineState *ms = S390_CCW_MACHINE(machine);
     static Error *local_err;
+    CPUS390XState *env;
 
     /* get the reset parameters, reset them once done */
     s390_ipl_get_reset_request(&cs, &reset_type);
@@ -399,10 +414,16 @@ static void s390_machine_reset(MachineState *machine)
     s390_cmma_reset();
 
     cpu = S390_CPU(cs);
+    env = &cpu->env;
 
     switch (reset_type) {
     case S390_RESET_EXTERNAL:
     case S390_RESET_REIPL:
+        if (ms->pv) {
+            s390_machine_unprotect(ms);
+            migrate_del_blocker(pv_mig_blocker);
+        }
+
         qemu_devices_reset();
         s390_crypto_reset();
 
@@ -410,21 +431,31 @@ static void s390_machine_reset(MachineState *machine)
         run_on_cpu(cs, s390_do_cpu_ipl, RUN_ON_CPU_NULL);
         break;
     case S390_RESET_MODIFIED_CLEAR:
+        /*
+         * Susbsystem reset needs to be done before we unshare memory
+         * and loose access to VIRTIO structures in guest memory.
+         */
+        subsystem_reset();
+        s390_crypto_reset();
+        s390_pv_prepare_reset(env);
         CPU_FOREACH(t) {
             run_on_cpu(t, s390_do_cpu_full_reset, RUN_ON_CPU_NULL);
         }
-        subsystem_reset();
-        s390_crypto_reset();
         run_on_cpu(cs, s390_do_cpu_load_normal, RUN_ON_CPU_NULL);
         break;
     case S390_RESET_LOAD_NORMAL:
+        /*
+         * Susbsystem reset needs to be done before we unshare memory
+         * and loose access to VIRTIO structures in guest memory.
+         */
+        subsystem_reset();
+        s390_pv_prepare_reset(env);
         CPU_FOREACH(t) {
             if (t == cs) {
                 continue;
             }
             run_on_cpu(t, s390_do_cpu_reset, RUN_ON_CPU_NULL);
         }
-        subsystem_reset();
         run_on_cpu(cs, s390_do_cpu_initial_reset, RUN_ON_CPU_NULL);
         run_on_cpu(cs, s390_do_cpu_load_normal, RUN_ON_CPU_NULL);
         break;
diff --git a/target/s390x/diag.c b/target/s390x/diag.c
index 5e77d85652..aedc774695 100644
--- a/target/s390x/diag.c
+++ b/target/s390x/diag.c
@@ -68,6 +68,10 @@ int handle_diag_288(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t r1, uint64_t r3)
 static int diag308_parm_check(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t r1, uint64_t addr,
                               uintptr_t ra, bool write)
 {
+    /* Handled by the Ultravisor */
+    if (env->pv) {
+        return 0;
+    }
     if ((r1 & 1) || (addr & ~TARGET_PAGE_MASK)) {
         s390_program_interrupt(env, PGM_SPECIFICATION, ra);
         return -1;
-- 
2.20.1



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 06/16] s390x: protvirt: KVM intercept changes
  2020-02-20 12:56 [PATCH v4 00/16] s390x: Protected Virtualization support Janosch Frank
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-02-20 12:56 ` [PATCH v4 05/16] s390x: protvirt: Handle diag 308 subcodes 0,1,3,4 Janosch Frank
@ 2020-02-20 12:56 ` Janosch Frank
  2020-02-25 10:01   ` David Hildenbrand
  2020-02-20 12:56 ` [PATCH v4 07/16] s390x: Add SIDA memory ops Janosch Frank
                   ` (9 subsequent siblings)
  15 siblings, 1 reply; 32+ messages in thread
From: Janosch Frank @ 2020-02-20 12:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qemu-devel; +Cc: qemu-s390x, mihajlov, david, cohuck

Secure guests no longer intercept with code 4 for an instruction
interception. Instead they have codes 104 and 108 for secure
instruction interception and secure instruction notification
respectively.

The 104 mirrors the 4 interception.

The 108 is a notification interception to let KVM and QEMU know that
something changed and we need to update tracking information or
perform specific tasks. It's currently taken for the following
instructions:

* stpx (To inform about the changed prefix location)
* sclp (On incorrect SCCB values, so we can inject a IRQ)
* sigp (All but "stop and store status")
* diag308 (Subcodes 0/1)

Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
---
 target/s390x/kvm.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/target/s390x/kvm.c b/target/s390x/kvm.c
index 1d6fd6a27b..eec0b92479 100644
--- a/target/s390x/kvm.c
+++ b/target/s390x/kvm.c
@@ -115,6 +115,8 @@
 #define ICPT_CPU_STOP                   0x28
 #define ICPT_OPEREXC                    0x2c
 #define ICPT_IO                         0x40
+#define ICPT_PV_INSTR                   0x68
+#define ICPT_PV_INSTR_NOTIFICATION      0x6c
 
 #define NR_LOCAL_IRQS 32
 /*
@@ -1693,6 +1695,8 @@ static int handle_intercept(S390CPU *cpu)
             (long)cs->kvm_run->psw_addr);
     switch (icpt_code) {
         case ICPT_INSTRUCTION:
+        case ICPT_PV_INSTR:
+        case ICPT_PV_INSTR_NOTIFICATION:
             r = handle_instruction(cpu, run);
             break;
         case ICPT_PROGRAM:
-- 
2.20.1



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 07/16] s390x: Add SIDA memory ops
  2020-02-20 12:56 [PATCH v4 00/16] s390x: Protected Virtualization support Janosch Frank
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-02-20 12:56 ` [PATCH v4 06/16] s390x: protvirt: KVM intercept changes Janosch Frank
@ 2020-02-20 12:56 ` Janosch Frank
  2020-02-25  9:59   ` David Hildenbrand
  2020-02-20 12:56 ` [PATCH v4 08/16] s390x: protvirt: Move STSI data over SIDAD Janosch Frank
                   ` (8 subsequent siblings)
  15 siblings, 1 reply; 32+ messages in thread
From: Janosch Frank @ 2020-02-20 12:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qemu-devel; +Cc: qemu-s390x, mihajlov, david, cohuck

Protected guests save the instruction control blocks in the SIDA
instead of QEMU/KVM directly accessing the guest's memory.

Let's introduce new functions to access the SIDA.

Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
---
 linux-headers/linux/kvm.h |  2 ++
 target/s390x/cpu.h        |  7 ++++++-
 target/s390x/kvm.c        | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
 target/s390x/kvm_s390x.h  |  2 ++
 target/s390x/mmu_helper.c |  9 +++++++++
 5 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/linux-headers/linux/kvm.h b/linux-headers/linux/kvm.h
index 2e647f2d9b..7ccf5988d2 100644
--- a/linux-headers/linux/kvm.h
+++ b/linux-headers/linux/kvm.h
@@ -483,6 +483,8 @@ struct kvm_s390_mem_op {
 /* types for kvm_s390_mem_op->op */
 #define KVM_S390_MEMOP_LOGICAL_READ	0
 #define KVM_S390_MEMOP_LOGICAL_WRITE	1
+#define KVM_S390_MEMOP_SIDA_READ	2
+#define KVM_S390_MEMOP_SIDA_WRITE	3
 /* flags for kvm_s390_mem_op->flags */
 #define KVM_S390_MEMOP_F_CHECK_ONLY		(1ULL << 0)
 #define KVM_S390_MEMOP_F_INJECT_EXCEPTION	(1ULL << 1)
diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu.h b/target/s390x/cpu.h
index cbc53c99cf..491d6860a8 100644
--- a/target/s390x/cpu.h
+++ b/target/s390x/cpu.h
@@ -823,7 +823,12 @@ int s390_cpu_virt_mem_rw(S390CPU *cpu, vaddr laddr, uint8_t ar, void *hostbuf,
 #define s390_cpu_virt_mem_check_write(cpu, laddr, ar, len)   \
         s390_cpu_virt_mem_rw(cpu, laddr, ar, NULL, len, true)
 void s390_cpu_virt_mem_handle_exc(S390CPU *cpu, uintptr_t ra);
-
+int s390_cpu_pv_mem_rw(S390CPU *cpu, unsigned int offset,  void *hostbuf,
+                       int len, bool is_write);
+#define s390_cpu_pv_mem_read(cpu, offset, dest, len)    \
+        s390_cpu_pv_mem_rw(cpu, offset, dest, len, false)
+#define s390_cpu_pv_mem_write(cpu, offset, dest, len)       \
+        s390_cpu_pv_mem_rw(cpu, offset, dest, len, true)
 
 /* sigp.c */
 int s390_cpu_restart(S390CPU *cpu);
diff --git a/target/s390x/kvm.c b/target/s390x/kvm.c
index eec0b92479..f222836df5 100644
--- a/target/s390x/kvm.c
+++ b/target/s390x/kvm.c
@@ -846,6 +846,29 @@ int kvm_s390_mem_op(S390CPU *cpu, vaddr addr, uint8_t ar, void *hostbuf,
     return ret;
 }
 
+int kvm_s390_mem_op_pv(S390CPU *cpu, uint64_t offset, void *hostbuf,
+                       int len, bool is_write)
+{
+    int ret = 0;
+    struct kvm_s390_mem_op mem_op = {
+        .sida_offset = offset,
+        .size = len,
+        .op = is_write ? KVM_S390_MEMOP_SIDA_WRITE
+                       : KVM_S390_MEMOP_SIDA_READ,
+        .buf = (uint64_t)hostbuf,
+    };
+
+    if (!cap_mem_op) {
+        return -ENOSYS;
+    }
+
+    ret = kvm_vcpu_ioctl(CPU(cpu), KVM_S390_MEM_OP, &mem_op);
+    if (ret < 0) {
+        warn_report("KVM_S390_MEM_OP failed: %s", strerror(-ret));
+    }
+    return ret;
+}
+
 /*
  * Legacy layout for s390:
  * Older S390 KVM requires the topmost vma of the RAM to be
diff --git a/target/s390x/kvm_s390x.h b/target/s390x/kvm_s390x.h
index 0b21789796..9c38f6ccce 100644
--- a/target/s390x/kvm_s390x.h
+++ b/target/s390x/kvm_s390x.h
@@ -19,6 +19,8 @@ void kvm_s390_vcpu_interrupt(S390CPU *cpu, struct kvm_s390_irq *irq);
 void kvm_s390_access_exception(S390CPU *cpu, uint16_t code, uint64_t te_code);
 int kvm_s390_mem_op(S390CPU *cpu, vaddr addr, uint8_t ar, void *hostbuf,
                     int len, bool is_write);
+int kvm_s390_mem_op_pv(S390CPU *cpu, vaddr addr, void *hostbuf, int len,
+                       bool is_write);
 void kvm_s390_program_interrupt(S390CPU *cpu, uint16_t code);
 int kvm_s390_set_cpu_state(S390CPU *cpu, uint8_t cpu_state);
 void kvm_s390_vcpu_interrupt_pre_save(S390CPU *cpu);
diff --git a/target/s390x/mmu_helper.c b/target/s390x/mmu_helper.c
index c9f3f34750..ad485399db 100644
--- a/target/s390x/mmu_helper.c
+++ b/target/s390x/mmu_helper.c
@@ -474,6 +474,15 @@ static int translate_pages(S390CPU *cpu, vaddr addr, int nr_pages,
     return 0;
 }
 
+int s390_cpu_pv_mem_rw(S390CPU *cpu, unsigned int offset, void *hostbuf,
+                       int len, bool is_write)
+{
+    int ret;
+
+    ret = kvm_s390_mem_op_pv(cpu, offset, hostbuf, len, is_write);
+    return ret;
+}
+
 /**
  * s390_cpu_virt_mem_rw:
  * @laddr:     the logical start address
-- 
2.20.1



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 08/16] s390x: protvirt: Move STSI data over SIDAD
  2020-02-20 12:56 [PATCH v4 00/16] s390x: Protected Virtualization support Janosch Frank
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-02-20 12:56 ` [PATCH v4 07/16] s390x: Add SIDA memory ops Janosch Frank
@ 2020-02-20 12:56 ` Janosch Frank
  2020-02-25 10:05   ` David Hildenbrand
  2020-02-20 12:56 ` [PATCH v4 09/16] s390x: protvirt: SCLP interpretation Janosch Frank
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  15 siblings, 1 reply; 32+ messages in thread
From: Janosch Frank @ 2020-02-20 12:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qemu-devel; +Cc: qemu-s390x, mihajlov, david, cohuck

For protected guests, we need to put the STSI emulation results into
the SIDA, so SIE will write them into the guest at the next entry.

Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
---
 target/s390x/kvm.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/s390x/kvm.c b/target/s390x/kvm.c
index f222836df5..3a5a5146e3 100644
--- a/target/s390x/kvm.c
+++ b/target/s390x/kvm.c
@@ -1795,11 +1795,16 @@ static int handle_tsch(S390CPU *cpu)
 
 static void insert_stsi_3_2_2(S390CPU *cpu, __u64 addr, uint8_t ar)
 {
+    CPUS390XState *env = &cpu->env;
     SysIB_322 sysib;
     int del;
 
-    if (s390_cpu_virt_mem_read(cpu, addr, ar, &sysib, sizeof(sysib))) {
-        return;
+    if (env->pv) {
+        s390_cpu_pv_mem_read(cpu, 0, &sysib, sizeof(sysib));
+    } else {
+        if (s390_cpu_virt_mem_read(cpu, addr, ar, &sysib, sizeof(sysib))) {
+            return;
+        }
     }
     /* Shift the stack of Extended Names to prepare for our own data */
     memmove(&sysib.ext_names[1], &sysib.ext_names[0],
@@ -1838,7 +1843,11 @@ static void insert_stsi_3_2_2(S390CPU *cpu, __u64 addr, uint8_t ar)
     /* Insert UUID */
     memcpy(sysib.vm[0].uuid, &qemu_uuid, sizeof(sysib.vm[0].uuid));
 
-    s390_cpu_virt_mem_write(cpu, addr, ar, &sysib, sizeof(sysib));
+    if (env->pv) {
+        s390_cpu_pv_mem_write(cpu, 0, &sysib, sizeof(sysib));
+    } else {
+        s390_cpu_virt_mem_write(cpu, addr, ar, &sysib, sizeof(sysib));
+    }
 }
 
 static int handle_stsi(S390CPU *cpu)
-- 
2.20.1



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 09/16] s390x: protvirt: SCLP interpretation
  2020-02-20 12:56 [PATCH v4 00/16] s390x: Protected Virtualization support Janosch Frank
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-02-20 12:56 ` [PATCH v4 08/16] s390x: protvirt: Move STSI data over SIDAD Janosch Frank
@ 2020-02-20 12:56 ` Janosch Frank
  2020-02-20 12:56 ` [PATCH v4 10/16] s390x: protvirt: Set guest IPL PSW Janosch Frank
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  15 siblings, 0 replies; 32+ messages in thread
From: Janosch Frank @ 2020-02-20 12:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qemu-devel; +Cc: qemu-s390x, mihajlov, david, cohuck

SCLP for a protected guest is done over the SIDAD, so we need to use
the s390_cpu_virt_mem_* functions to access the SIDAD instead of guest
memory when reading/writing SCBs.

To not confuse the sclp emulation, we set 0x4000 as the SCCB address,
since the function that injects the sclp external interrupt would
reject a zero sccb address.

Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
---
 hw/s390x/sclp.c         | 17 +++++++++++++++++
 include/hw/s390x/sclp.h |  2 ++
 target/s390x/kvm.c      |  5 +++++
 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+)

diff --git a/hw/s390x/sclp.c b/hw/s390x/sclp.c
index af0bfbc2ec..5136f5fcbe 100644
--- a/hw/s390x/sclp.c
+++ b/hw/s390x/sclp.c
@@ -193,6 +193,23 @@ static void sclp_execute(SCLPDevice *sclp, SCCB *sccb, uint32_t code)
     }
 }
 
+#define SCLP_PV_DUMMY_ADDR 0x4000
+int sclp_service_call_protected(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t sccb,
+                                uint32_t code)
+{
+    SCLPDevice *sclp = get_sclp_device();
+    SCLPDeviceClass *sclp_c = SCLP_GET_CLASS(sclp);
+    SCCB work_sccb;
+    hwaddr sccb_len = sizeof(SCCB);
+
+    s390_cpu_pv_mem_read(env_archcpu(env), 0, &work_sccb, sccb_len);
+    sclp_c->execute(sclp, &work_sccb, code);
+    s390_cpu_pv_mem_write(env_archcpu(env), 0, &work_sccb,
+                          be16_to_cpu(work_sccb.h.length));
+    sclp_c->service_interrupt(sclp, SCLP_PV_DUMMY_ADDR);
+    return 0;
+}
+
 int sclp_service_call(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t sccb, uint32_t code)
 {
     SCLPDevice *sclp = get_sclp_device();
diff --git a/include/hw/s390x/sclp.h b/include/hw/s390x/sclp.h
index c54413b78c..c0a3faa37d 100644
--- a/include/hw/s390x/sclp.h
+++ b/include/hw/s390x/sclp.h
@@ -217,5 +217,7 @@ void s390_sclp_init(void);
 void sclp_service_interrupt(uint32_t sccb);
 void raise_irq_cpu_hotplug(void);
 int sclp_service_call(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t sccb, uint32_t code);
+int sclp_service_call_protected(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t sccb,
+                                uint32_t code);
 
 #endif
diff --git a/target/s390x/kvm.c b/target/s390x/kvm.c
index 3a5a5146e3..31dd49729b 100644
--- a/target/s390x/kvm.c
+++ b/target/s390x/kvm.c
@@ -1224,6 +1224,11 @@ static void kvm_sclp_service_call(S390CPU *cpu, struct kvm_run *run,
     sccb = env->regs[ipbh0 & 0xf];
     code = env->regs[(ipbh0 & 0xf0) >> 4];
 
+    if (run->s390_sieic.icptcode == ICPT_PV_INSTR) {
+        sclp_service_call_protected(env, sccb, code);
+        return;
+    }
+
     r = sclp_service_call(env, sccb, code);
     if (r < 0) {
         kvm_s390_program_interrupt(cpu, -r);
-- 
2.20.1



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 10/16] s390x: protvirt: Set guest IPL PSW
  2020-02-20 12:56 [PATCH v4 00/16] s390x: Protected Virtualization support Janosch Frank
                   ` (8 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-02-20 12:56 ` [PATCH v4 09/16] s390x: protvirt: SCLP interpretation Janosch Frank
@ 2020-02-20 12:56 ` Janosch Frank
  2020-02-20 12:56 ` [PATCH v4 11/16] s390x: protvirt: Move diag 308 data over SIDAD Janosch Frank
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  15 siblings, 0 replies; 32+ messages in thread
From: Janosch Frank @ 2020-02-20 12:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qemu-devel; +Cc: qemu-s390x, mihajlov, david, cohuck

Handling of CPU reset and setting of the IPL psw from guest storage at
offset 0 is done by a Ultravisor call. Let's only fetch it if
necessary.

Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
---
 target/s390x/cpu.c | 23 ++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu.c b/target/s390x/cpu.c
index 1dbd84b9d7..fe2ac450d2 100644
--- a/target/s390x/cpu.c
+++ b/target/s390x/cpu.c
@@ -78,16 +78,21 @@ static bool s390_cpu_has_work(CPUState *cs)
 static void s390_cpu_load_normal(CPUState *s)
 {
     S390CPU *cpu = S390_CPU(s);
-    uint64_t spsw = ldq_phys(s->as, 0);
-
-    cpu->env.psw.mask = spsw & 0xffffffff80000000ULL;
-    /*
-     * Invert short psw indication, so SIE will report a specification
-     * exception if it was not set.
-     */
-    cpu->env.psw.mask ^= PSW_MASK_SHORTPSW;
-    cpu->env.psw.addr = spsw & 0x7fffffffULL;
+    CPUS390XState *env = &cpu->env;
+    uint64_t spsw;
 
+    if (!env->pv) {
+        spsw = ldq_phys(s->as, 0);
+        cpu->env.psw.mask = spsw & 0xffffffff80000000ULL;
+        /*
+         * Invert short psw indication, so SIE will report a specification
+         * exception if it was not set.
+         */
+        cpu->env.psw.mask ^= PSW_MASK_SHORTPSW;
+        cpu->env.psw.addr = spsw & 0x7fffffffULL;
+    } else {
+        s390_cpu_set_state(S390_CPU_STATE_LOAD, cpu);
+    }
     s390_cpu_set_state(S390_CPU_STATE_OPERATING, cpu);
 }
 #endif
-- 
2.20.1



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 11/16] s390x: protvirt: Move diag 308 data over SIDAD
  2020-02-20 12:56 [PATCH v4 00/16] s390x: Protected Virtualization support Janosch Frank
                   ` (9 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-02-20 12:56 ` [PATCH v4 10/16] s390x: protvirt: Set guest IPL PSW Janosch Frank
@ 2020-02-20 12:56 ` Janosch Frank
  2020-02-20 12:56 ` [PATCH v4 12/16] s390x: protvirt: Disable address checks for PV guest IO emulation Janosch Frank
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  15 siblings, 0 replies; 32+ messages in thread
From: Janosch Frank @ 2020-02-20 12:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qemu-devel; +Cc: qemu-s390x, mihajlov, david, cohuck

For protected guests the IPIB is written/read to/from the satellite
block, so we need those accesses to go through
s390_cpu_pv_mem_read/write().

Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
---
 target/s390x/diag.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/s390x/diag.c b/target/s390x/diag.c
index aedc774695..be80c0367b 100644
--- a/target/s390x/diag.c
+++ b/target/s390x/diag.c
@@ -88,6 +88,7 @@ static int diag308_parm_check(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t r1, uint64_t addr,
 void handle_diag_308(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t r1, uint64_t r3, uintptr_t ra)
 {
     CPUState *cs = env_cpu(env);
+    S390CPU *cpu = S390_CPU(cs);
     uint64_t addr =  env->regs[r1];
     uint64_t subcode = env->regs[r3];
     IplParameterBlock *iplb;
@@ -119,13 +120,22 @@ void handle_diag_308(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t r1, uint64_t r3, uintptr_t ra)
             return;
         }
         iplb = g_new0(IplParameterBlock, 1);
-        cpu_physical_memory_read(addr, iplb, sizeof(iplb->len));
+        if (!env->pv) {
+            cpu_physical_memory_read(addr, iplb, sizeof(iplb->len));
+        } else {
+            s390_cpu_pv_mem_read(cpu, 0, iplb, sizeof(iplb->len));
+        }
+
         if (!iplb_valid_len(iplb)) {
             env->regs[r1 + 1] = DIAG_308_RC_INVALID;
             goto out;
         }
 
-        cpu_physical_memory_read(addr, iplb, be32_to_cpu(iplb->len));
+        if (!env->pv) {
+            cpu_physical_memory_read(addr, iplb, be32_to_cpu(iplb->len));
+        } else {
+            s390_cpu_pv_mem_read(cpu, 0, iplb, be32_to_cpu(iplb->len));
+        }
 
         if (!iplb_valid_ccw(iplb) && !iplb_valid_fcp(iplb) &&
             !(iplb_valid_pv(iplb) && s390_ipl_pv_check_components(iplb) >= 0)) {
@@ -137,7 +147,7 @@ void handle_diag_308(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t r1, uint64_t r3, uintptr_t ra)
         env->regs[r1 + 1] = DIAG_308_RC_OK;
 out:
         g_free(iplb);
-        return;
+        break;
     case DIAG308_STORE:
     case DIAG308_PV_STORE:
         if (diag308_parm_check(env, r1, addr, ra, true)) {
@@ -148,12 +158,18 @@ out:
         } else {
             iplb = s390_ipl_get_iplb();
         }
-        if (iplb) {
-            cpu_physical_memory_write(addr, iplb, be32_to_cpu(iplb->len));
-            env->regs[r1 + 1] = DIAG_308_RC_OK;
-        } else {
+        if (!iplb) {
             env->regs[r1 + 1] = DIAG_308_RC_NO_CONF;
+            return;
         }
+
+        if (!env->pv) {
+            cpu_physical_memory_write(addr, iplb, be32_to_cpu(iplb->len));
+        } else {
+            s390_cpu_pv_mem_write(cpu, 0, iplb, be32_to_cpu(iplb->len));
+        }
+
+        env->regs[r1 + 1] = DIAG_308_RC_OK;
         break;
     case DIAG308_PV_START:
         iplb = s390_ipl_get_iplb_secure();
-- 
2.20.1



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 12/16] s390x: protvirt: Disable address checks for PV guest IO emulation
  2020-02-20 12:56 [PATCH v4 00/16] s390x: Protected Virtualization support Janosch Frank
                   ` (10 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-02-20 12:56 ` [PATCH v4 11/16] s390x: protvirt: Move diag 308 data over SIDAD Janosch Frank
@ 2020-02-20 12:56 ` Janosch Frank
  2020-02-20 12:56 ` [PATCH v4 13/16] s390x: protvirt: Move IO control structures over SIDA Janosch Frank
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  15 siblings, 0 replies; 32+ messages in thread
From: Janosch Frank @ 2020-02-20 12:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qemu-devel; +Cc: qemu-s390x, mihajlov, david, cohuck

IO instruction data is routed through SIDAD for protected guests, so
adresses do not need to be checked, as this is kernel memory.

Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
---
 target/s390x/ioinst.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/s390x/ioinst.c b/target/s390x/ioinst.c
index c437a1d8c6..e4102430aa 100644
--- a/target/s390x/ioinst.c
+++ b/target/s390x/ioinst.c
@@ -17,6 +17,16 @@
 #include "trace.h"
 #include "hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.h"
 
+static uint64_t get_address_from_regs(CPUS390XState *env, uint32_t ipb,
+                                      uint8_t *ar)
+{
+    if (env->pv) {
+        *ar = 0;
+        return 0;
+    }
+    return decode_basedisp_s(env, ipb, ar);
+}
+
 int ioinst_disassemble_sch_ident(uint32_t value, int *m, int *cssid, int *ssid,
                                  int *schid)
 {
@@ -114,7 +124,7 @@ void ioinst_handle_msch(S390CPU *cpu, uint64_t reg1, uint32_t ipb, uintptr_t ra)
     CPUS390XState *env = &cpu->env;
     uint8_t ar;
 
-    addr = decode_basedisp_s(env, ipb, &ar);
+    addr = get_address_from_regs(env, ipb, &ar);
     if (addr & 3) {
         s390_program_interrupt(env, PGM_SPECIFICATION, ra);
         return;
@@ -171,7 +181,7 @@ void ioinst_handle_ssch(S390CPU *cpu, uint64_t reg1, uint32_t ipb, uintptr_t ra)
     CPUS390XState *env = &cpu->env;
     uint8_t ar;
 
-    addr = decode_basedisp_s(env, ipb, &ar);
+    addr = get_address_from_regs(env, ipb, &ar);
     if (addr & 3) {
         s390_program_interrupt(env, PGM_SPECIFICATION, ra);
         return;
@@ -203,7 +213,7 @@ void ioinst_handle_stcrw(S390CPU *cpu, uint32_t ipb, uintptr_t ra)
     CPUS390XState *env = &cpu->env;
     uint8_t ar;
 
-    addr = decode_basedisp_s(env, ipb, &ar);
+    addr = get_address_from_regs(env, ipb, &ar);
     if (addr & 3) {
         s390_program_interrupt(env, PGM_SPECIFICATION, ra);
         return;
@@ -234,7 +244,7 @@ void ioinst_handle_stsch(S390CPU *cpu, uint64_t reg1, uint32_t ipb,
     CPUS390XState *env = &cpu->env;
     uint8_t ar;
 
-    addr = decode_basedisp_s(env, ipb, &ar);
+    addr = get_address_from_regs(env, ipb, &ar);
     if (addr & 3) {
         s390_program_interrupt(env, PGM_SPECIFICATION, ra);
         return;
@@ -303,7 +313,7 @@ int ioinst_handle_tsch(S390CPU *cpu, uint64_t reg1, uint32_t ipb, uintptr_t ra)
         return -EIO;
     }
     trace_ioinst_sch_id("tsch", cssid, ssid, schid);
-    addr = decode_basedisp_s(env, ipb, &ar);
+    addr = get_address_from_regs(env, ipb, &ar);
     if (addr & 3) {
         s390_program_interrupt(env, PGM_SPECIFICATION, ra);
         return -EIO;
@@ -601,7 +611,7 @@ void ioinst_handle_chsc(S390CPU *cpu, uint32_t ipb, uintptr_t ra)
 {
     ChscReq *req;
     ChscResp *res;
-    uint64_t addr;
+    uint64_t addr = 0;
     int reg;
     uint16_t len;
     uint16_t command;
@@ -610,7 +620,9 @@ void ioinst_handle_chsc(S390CPU *cpu, uint32_t ipb, uintptr_t ra)
 
     trace_ioinst("chsc");
     reg = (ipb >> 20) & 0x00f;
-    addr = env->regs[reg];
+    if (!env->pv) {
+        addr = env->regs[reg];
+    }
     /* Page boundary? */
     if (addr & 0xfff) {
         s390_program_interrupt(env, PGM_SPECIFICATION, ra);
-- 
2.20.1



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 13/16] s390x: protvirt: Move IO control structures over SIDA
  2020-02-20 12:56 [PATCH v4 00/16] s390x: Protected Virtualization support Janosch Frank
                   ` (11 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-02-20 12:56 ` [PATCH v4 12/16] s390x: protvirt: Disable address checks for PV guest IO emulation Janosch Frank
@ 2020-02-20 12:56 ` Janosch Frank
  2020-02-20 12:56 ` [PATCH v4 14/16] s390x: protvirt: Handle SIGP store status correctly Janosch Frank
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  15 siblings, 0 replies; 32+ messages in thread
From: Janosch Frank @ 2020-02-20 12:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qemu-devel; +Cc: qemu-s390x, mihajlov, david, cohuck

For protected guests, we need to put the IO emulation results into the
SIDA, so SIE will write them into the guest at the next entry.

Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
---
 target/s390x/ioinst.c | 87 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/s390x/ioinst.c b/target/s390x/ioinst.c
index e4102430aa..330b04d79a 100644
--- a/target/s390x/ioinst.c
+++ b/target/s390x/ioinst.c
@@ -129,9 +129,13 @@ void ioinst_handle_msch(S390CPU *cpu, uint64_t reg1, uint32_t ipb, uintptr_t ra)
         s390_program_interrupt(env, PGM_SPECIFICATION, ra);
         return;
     }
-    if (s390_cpu_virt_mem_read(cpu, addr, ar, &schib, sizeof(schib))) {
-        s390_cpu_virt_mem_handle_exc(cpu, ra);
-        return;
+    if (env->pv) {
+        s390_cpu_pv_mem_read(cpu, addr, &schib, sizeof(schib));
+    } else {
+        if (s390_cpu_virt_mem_read(cpu, addr, ar, &schib, sizeof(schib))) {
+            s390_cpu_virt_mem_handle_exc(cpu, ra);
+            return;
+        }
     }
     if (ioinst_disassemble_sch_ident(reg1, &m, &cssid, &ssid, &schid) ||
         !ioinst_schib_valid(&schib)) {
@@ -186,9 +190,13 @@ void ioinst_handle_ssch(S390CPU *cpu, uint64_t reg1, uint32_t ipb, uintptr_t ra)
         s390_program_interrupt(env, PGM_SPECIFICATION, ra);
         return;
     }
-    if (s390_cpu_virt_mem_read(cpu, addr, ar, &orig_orb, sizeof(orb))) {
-        s390_cpu_virt_mem_handle_exc(cpu, ra);
-        return;
+    if (env->pv) {
+        s390_cpu_pv_mem_read(cpu, addr, &orig_orb, sizeof(orb));
+    } else {
+        if (s390_cpu_virt_mem_read(cpu, addr, ar, &orig_orb, sizeof(orb))) {
+            s390_cpu_virt_mem_handle_exc(cpu, ra);
+            return;
+        }
     }
     copy_orb_from_guest(&orb, &orig_orb);
     if (ioinst_disassemble_sch_ident(reg1, &m, &cssid, &ssid, &schid) ||
@@ -222,14 +230,19 @@ void ioinst_handle_stcrw(S390CPU *cpu, uint32_t ipb, uintptr_t ra)
     cc = css_do_stcrw(&crw);
     /* 0 - crw stored, 1 - zeroes stored */
 
-    if (s390_cpu_virt_mem_write(cpu, addr, ar, &crw, sizeof(crw)) == 0) {
+    if (env->pv) {
+        s390_cpu_pv_mem_write(cpu, addr, &crw, sizeof(crw));
         setcc(cpu, cc);
     } else {
-        if (cc == 0) {
-            /* Write failed: requeue CRW since STCRW is suppressing */
-            css_undo_stcrw(&crw);
+        if (s390_cpu_virt_mem_write(cpu, addr, ar, &crw, sizeof(crw)) == 0) {
+            setcc(cpu, cc);
+        } else {
+            if (cc == 0) {
+                /* Write failed: requeue CRW since STCRW is suppressing */
+                css_undo_stcrw(&crw);
+            }
+            s390_cpu_virt_mem_handle_exc(cpu, ra);
         }
-        s390_cpu_virt_mem_handle_exc(cpu, ra);
     }
 }
 
@@ -251,6 +264,9 @@ void ioinst_handle_stsch(S390CPU *cpu, uint64_t reg1, uint32_t ipb,
     }
 
     if (ioinst_disassemble_sch_ident(reg1, &m, &cssid, &ssid, &schid)) {
+        if (env->pv) {
+            return;
+        }
         /*
          * As operand exceptions have a lower priority than access exceptions,
          * we check whether the memory area is writeable (injecting the
@@ -283,14 +299,19 @@ void ioinst_handle_stsch(S390CPU *cpu, uint64_t reg1, uint32_t ipb,
         }
     }
     if (cc != 3) {
-        if (s390_cpu_virt_mem_write(cpu, addr, ar, &schib,
-                                    sizeof(schib)) != 0) {
-            s390_cpu_virt_mem_handle_exc(cpu, ra);
-            return;
+        if (env->pv) {
+            s390_cpu_pv_mem_write(cpu, addr, &schib, sizeof(schib));
+        } else {
+            if (s390_cpu_virt_mem_write(cpu, addr, ar, &schib,
+                                        sizeof(schib)) != 0) {
+                s390_cpu_virt_mem_handle_exc(cpu, ra);
+                return;
+            }
         }
     } else {
         /* Access exceptions have a higher priority than cc3 */
-        if (s390_cpu_virt_mem_check_write(cpu, addr, ar, sizeof(schib)) != 0) {
+        if (!env->pv &&
+            s390_cpu_virt_mem_check_write(cpu, addr, ar, sizeof(schib)) != 0) {
             s390_cpu_virt_mem_handle_exc(cpu, ra);
             return;
         }
@@ -327,15 +348,20 @@ int ioinst_handle_tsch(S390CPU *cpu, uint64_t reg1, uint32_t ipb, uintptr_t ra)
     }
     /* 0 - status pending, 1 - not status pending, 3 - not operational */
     if (cc != 3) {
-        if (s390_cpu_virt_mem_write(cpu, addr, ar, &irb, irb_len) != 0) {
-            s390_cpu_virt_mem_handle_exc(cpu, ra);
-            return -EFAULT;
+        if (env->pv) {
+            s390_cpu_pv_mem_write(cpu, addr, &irb, irb_len);
+        } else {
+            if (s390_cpu_virt_mem_write(cpu, addr, ar, &irb, irb_len) != 0) {
+                s390_cpu_virt_mem_handle_exc(cpu, ra);
+                return -EFAULT;
+            }
         }
         css_do_tsch_update_subch(sch);
     } else {
         irb_len = sizeof(irb) - sizeof(irb.emw);
         /* Access exceptions have a higher priority than cc3 */
-        if (s390_cpu_virt_mem_check_write(cpu, addr, ar, irb_len) != 0) {
+        if (!env->pv &&
+            s390_cpu_virt_mem_check_write(cpu, addr, ar, irb_len) != 0) {
             s390_cpu_virt_mem_handle_exc(cpu, ra);
             return -EFAULT;
         }
@@ -633,9 +659,13 @@ void ioinst_handle_chsc(S390CPU *cpu, uint32_t ipb, uintptr_t ra)
      * present CHSC sub-handlers ... if we ever need more, we should take
      * care of req->len here first.
      */
-    if (s390_cpu_virt_mem_read(cpu, addr, reg, buf, sizeof(ChscReq))) {
-        s390_cpu_virt_mem_handle_exc(cpu, ra);
-        return;
+    if (env->pv) {
+        s390_cpu_pv_mem_read(cpu, addr, buf, sizeof(ChscReq));
+    } else {
+        if (s390_cpu_virt_mem_read(cpu, addr, reg, buf, sizeof(ChscReq))) {
+            s390_cpu_virt_mem_handle_exc(cpu, ra);
+            return;
+        }
     }
     req = (ChscReq *)buf;
     len = be16_to_cpu(req->len);
@@ -666,11 +696,16 @@ void ioinst_handle_chsc(S390CPU *cpu, uint32_t ipb, uintptr_t ra)
         break;
     }
 
-    if (!s390_cpu_virt_mem_write(cpu, addr + len, reg, res,
-                                 be16_to_cpu(res->len))) {
+    if (env->pv) {
+        s390_cpu_pv_mem_write(cpu, addr + len, res, be16_to_cpu(res->len));
         setcc(cpu, 0);    /* Command execution complete */
     } else {
-        s390_cpu_virt_mem_handle_exc(cpu, ra);
+        if (!s390_cpu_virt_mem_write(cpu, addr + len, reg, res,
+                                     be16_to_cpu(res->len))) {
+            setcc(cpu, 0);    /* Command execution complete */
+        } else {
+            s390_cpu_virt_mem_handle_exc(cpu, ra);
+        }
     }
 }
 
-- 
2.20.1



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 14/16] s390x: protvirt: Handle SIGP store status correctly
  2020-02-20 12:56 [PATCH v4 00/16] s390x: Protected Virtualization support Janosch Frank
                   ` (12 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-02-20 12:56 ` [PATCH v4 13/16] s390x: protvirt: Move IO control structures over SIDA Janosch Frank
@ 2020-02-20 12:56 ` Janosch Frank
  2020-02-20 12:56 ` [PATCH v4 15/16] s390x: Add unpack feature to GA1 Janosch Frank
  2020-02-20 12:56 ` [PATCH v4 16/16] docs: Add protvirt docs Janosch Frank
  15 siblings, 0 replies; 32+ messages in thread
From: Janosch Frank @ 2020-02-20 12:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qemu-devel; +Cc: qemu-s390x, mihajlov, david, cohuck

Status storing is not done by QEMU anymore, but is handled by SIE.

Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
---
 target/s390x/helper.c | 4 ++++
 target/s390x/sigp.c   | 1 +
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/target/s390x/helper.c b/target/s390x/helper.c
index a3a49164e4..3800c4b395 100644
--- a/target/s390x/helper.c
+++ b/target/s390x/helper.c
@@ -246,6 +246,10 @@ int s390_store_status(S390CPU *cpu, hwaddr addr, bool store_arch)
     hwaddr len = sizeof(*sa);
     int i;
 
+    if (cpu->env.pv) {
+        return 0;
+    }
+
     sa = cpu_physical_memory_map(addr, &len, 1);
     if (!sa) {
         return -EFAULT;
diff --git a/target/s390x/sigp.c b/target/s390x/sigp.c
index c604f17710..e1c8071464 100644
--- a/target/s390x/sigp.c
+++ b/target/s390x/sigp.c
@@ -497,6 +497,7 @@ void do_stop_interrupt(CPUS390XState *env)
     if (s390_cpu_set_state(S390_CPU_STATE_STOPPED, cpu) == 0) {
         qemu_system_shutdown_request(SHUTDOWN_CAUSE_GUEST_SHUTDOWN);
     }
+    /* Storing will occur on next SIE entry for protected VMs */
     if (cpu->env.sigp_order == SIGP_STOP_STORE_STATUS) {
         s390_store_status(cpu, S390_STORE_STATUS_DEF_ADDR, true);
     }
-- 
2.20.1



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 15/16] s390x: Add unpack feature to GA1
  2020-02-20 12:56 [PATCH v4 00/16] s390x: Protected Virtualization support Janosch Frank
                   ` (13 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-02-20 12:56 ` [PATCH v4 14/16] s390x: protvirt: Handle SIGP store status correctly Janosch Frank
@ 2020-02-20 12:56 ` Janosch Frank
  2020-02-25  9:53   ` David Hildenbrand
  2020-02-20 12:56 ` [PATCH v4 16/16] docs: Add protvirt docs Janosch Frank
  15 siblings, 1 reply; 32+ messages in thread
From: Janosch Frank @ 2020-02-20 12:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qemu-devel; +Cc: qemu-s390x, mihajlov, david, cohuck

From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>

Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
---
 target/s390x/gen-features.c | 1 +
 target/s390x/kvm.c          | 7 +++++++
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/target/s390x/gen-features.c b/target/s390x/gen-features.c
index 6278845b12..8ddeebc544 100644
--- a/target/s390x/gen-features.c
+++ b/target/s390x/gen-features.c
@@ -562,6 +562,7 @@ static uint16_t full_GEN15_GA1[] = {
     S390_FEAT_GROUP_MSA_EXT_9,
     S390_FEAT_GROUP_MSA_EXT_9_PCKMO,
     S390_FEAT_ETOKEN,
+    S390_FEAT_UNPACK,
 };
 
 /* Default features (in order of release)
diff --git a/target/s390x/kvm.c b/target/s390x/kvm.c
index 31dd49729b..5b6a7ca466 100644
--- a/target/s390x/kvm.c
+++ b/target/s390x/kvm.c
@@ -154,6 +154,7 @@ static int cap_ri;
 static int cap_gs;
 static int cap_hpage_1m;
 static int cap_vcpu_resets;
+static int cap_protected;
 
 static int active_cmma;
 
@@ -346,6 +347,7 @@ int kvm_arch_init(MachineState *ms, KVMState *s)
     cap_mem_op = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_S390_MEM_OP);
     cap_s390_irq = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_S390_INJECT_IRQ);
     cap_vcpu_resets = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_S390_VCPU_RESETS);
+    cap_protected = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_S390_PROTECTED);
 
     if (!kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_S390_GMAP)
         || !kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_S390_COW)) {
@@ -2394,6 +2396,11 @@ void kvm_s390_get_host_cpu_model(S390CPUModel *model, Error **errp)
         clear_bit(S390_FEAT_BPB, model->features);
     }
 
+    /* we do have the IPL enhancements */
+    if (cap_protected) {
+        set_bit(S390_FEAT_UNPACK, model->features);
+    }
+
     /* We emulate a zPCI bus and AEN, therefore we don't need HW support */
     set_bit(S390_FEAT_ZPCI, model->features);
     set_bit(S390_FEAT_ADAPTER_EVENT_NOTIFICATION, model->features);
-- 
2.20.1



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 16/16] docs: Add protvirt docs
  2020-02-20 12:56 [PATCH v4 00/16] s390x: Protected Virtualization support Janosch Frank
                   ` (14 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-02-20 12:56 ` [PATCH v4 15/16] s390x: Add unpack feature to GA1 Janosch Frank
@ 2020-02-20 12:56 ` Janosch Frank
  2020-02-21 10:00   ` Cornelia Huck
  15 siblings, 1 reply; 32+ messages in thread
From: Janosch Frank @ 2020-02-20 12:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qemu-devel; +Cc: qemu-s390x, mihajlov, david, cohuck

Lets add some documentation for the Protected VM functionality.

Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
---
 docs/protvirt.rst | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 docs/protvirt.rst

diff --git a/docs/protvirt.rst b/docs/protvirt.rst
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..8bfa72be01
--- /dev/null
+++ b/docs/protvirt.rst
@@ -0,1 +1,53 @@
+Protected Virtualization on s390x
+========================
+The memory and most of the register contents of Protected Virtual
+Machines (PVMs) are inaccessible to the hypervisor, effectively
+prohibiting VM introspection when the VM is running. At rest, PVMs are
+encrypted and can only be decrypted by the firmware of specific IBM Z
+machines.
+
+
+Prerequisites
+-------------
+To run PVMs, you need to have a machine with the Protected
+Virtualization feature, which is indicated by the Ultravisor Call
+facility (stfle bit 158). This is a KVM only feature, therefore you
+need a KVM which is able to support PVMs and activate the Ultravisor
+initialization by setting "prot_virt=1" on the kernel command line.
+
+If those requirements are met, the capability "KVM_CAP_S390_PROTECTED"
+will indicate that KVM can support PVMs on that LPAR.
+
+
+QEMU Settings
+-------------
+To indicate to the VM that it can move into protected mode, the
+"Unpack facility" (stfle bit 161) needs to be part of the cpu model of
+the VM.
+
+All I/O devices need to use the IOMMU.
+Passthrough devices are currently not supported.
+
+Host huge page backings are not supported. The guest however can use
+huge pages as indicated by its facilities.
+
+
+Boot Process
+-----------------
+A secure guest image can be booted from disk and using the QEMU
+command line. Booting from disk is done by the unmodified s390-ccw
+BIOS. I.e., the bootmap is interpreted and a number of components is
+read into memory and control is transferred to one of the components
+(zipl stage3), which does some fixups and then transfers control to
+some program residing in guest memory, which is normally the OS
+kernel. The secure image has another component prepended (stage3a)
+which uses the new diag308 subcodes 8 and 10 to trigger the transition
+into secure mode.
+
+Booting from the command line requires that the file passed
+via -kernel has the same memory layout as would result from the disk
+boot. This memory layout includes the encrypted components (kernel,
+initrd, cmdline), the stage3a loader and metadata. In case this boot
+method is used, the command line options -initrd and -cmdline are
+ineffective.  The preparation of secure guest image is done by a
+program (name tbd) of the s390-tools package.
-- 
2.20.1



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 02/16] s390x: protvirt: Add diag308 subcodes 8 - 10
  2020-02-20 12:56 ` [PATCH v4 02/16] s390x: protvirt: Add diag308 subcodes 8 - 10 Janosch Frank
@ 2020-02-21  9:49   ` Cornelia Huck
  2020-02-21 11:42     ` Janosch Frank
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 32+ messages in thread
From: Cornelia Huck @ 2020-02-21  9:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Janosch Frank; +Cc: qemu-s390x, mihajlov, qemu-devel, david

On Thu, 20 Feb 2020 07:56:24 -0500
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com> wrote:

> For diag308 subcodes 8 - 10 we have a new ipib of type 5. The ipib
> holds the address and length of the secure execution header, as well
> as a list of guest components.
> 
> Each component is a block of memory, for example kernel or initrd,
> which needs to be decrypted by the Ultravisor in order to run a
> protected VM. The secure execution header instructs the Ultravisor on
> how to handle the protected VM and its components.
> 
> Subcodes 8 and 9 are similiar to 5 and 6 and subcode 10 will finally
> start the protected guest.
> 
> Subcodes 8-10 are not valid in protected mode, we have to do a subcode
> 3 and then the 8 and 10 combination for a protected reboot.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  hw/s390x/ipl.c      | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  hw/s390x/ipl.h      | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  target/s390x/diag.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  3 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/s390x/ipl.c b/hw/s390x/ipl.c
> index 7773499d7f..e92d989813 100644
> --- a/hw/s390x/ipl.c
> +++ b/hw/s390x/ipl.c
> @@ -538,15 +538,56 @@ static bool is_virtio_scsi_device(IplParameterBlock *iplb)
>      return is_virtio_ccw_device_of_type(iplb, VIRTIO_ID_SCSI);
>  }
>  
> +int s390_ipl_pv_check_components(IplParameterBlock *iplb)
> +{
> +    int i;
> +    IPLBlockPV *ipib_pv = &iplb->pv;
> +
> +    if (ipib_pv->num_comp == 0) {
> +        return -EINVAL;
> +    }
> +
> +    for (i = 0; i < ipib_pv->num_comp; i++) {
> +
> +        /* Addr must be 4k aligned */
> +        if (ipib_pv->components[i].addr & ~TARGET_PAGE_MASK) {
> +            return -EINVAL;
> +        }
> +
> +        /* Tweak prefix is monotonously increasing with each component */
> +        if (i < ipib_pv->num_comp - 1 &&
> +            ipib_pv->components[i].tweak_pref >
> +            ipib_pv->components[i + 1].tweak_pref) {
> +            return -EINVAL;
> +        }
> +    }
> +    return 1;

Any reason why you return 1 here? 0 vs negative error is the more usual
pattern.

> +}
> +

(...)

> @@ -117,7 +123,8 @@ void handle_diag_308(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t r1, uint64_t r3, uintptr_t ra)
>  
>          cpu_physical_memory_read(addr, iplb, be32_to_cpu(iplb->len));
>  
> -        if (!iplb_valid_ccw(iplb) && !iplb_valid_fcp(iplb)) {
> +        if (!iplb_valid_ccw(iplb) && !iplb_valid_fcp(iplb) &&
> +            !(iplb_valid_pv(iplb) && s390_ipl_pv_check_components(iplb) >= 0)) {

!s390_ipl_pv_check_components() would also read nicer IMHO :)

>              env->regs[r1 + 1] = DIAG_308_RC_INVALID;
>              goto out;
>          }

Otherwise, looks good to me.



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 16/16] docs: Add protvirt docs
  2020-02-20 12:56 ` [PATCH v4 16/16] docs: Add protvirt docs Janosch Frank
@ 2020-02-21 10:00   ` Cornelia Huck
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 32+ messages in thread
From: Cornelia Huck @ 2020-02-21 10:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Janosch Frank; +Cc: qemu-s390x, mihajlov, qemu-devel, david

On Thu, 20 Feb 2020 07:56:38 -0500
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com> wrote:

> Lets add some documentation for the Protected VM functionality.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  docs/protvirt.rst | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 53 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 docs/protvirt.rst

You'll probably want to add that file to an index as well, so that it
gets built properly.

> 
> diff --git a/docs/protvirt.rst b/docs/protvirt.rst
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..8bfa72be01
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/docs/protvirt.rst
> @@ -0,1 +1,53 @@
> +Protected Virtualization on s390x
> +========================

Please lengthen the underlining :)

Also, it might improve readability of the text doc if you added an
empty line beneath the headers.

> +The memory and most of the register contents of Protected Virtual
> +Machines (PVMs) are inaccessible to the hypervisor, effectively
> +prohibiting VM introspection when the VM is running. At rest, PVMs are
> +encrypted and can only be decrypted by the firmware of specific IBM Z
> +machines.
> +
> +
> +Prerequisites
> +-------------
> +To run PVMs, you need to have a machine with the Protected
> +Virtualization feature, which is indicated by the Ultravisor Call
> +facility (stfle bit 158). This is a KVM only feature, therefore you
> +need a KVM which is able to support PVMs and activate the Ultravisor
> +initialization by setting "prot_virt=1" on the kernel command line.

`prot_virt=1`, so that it gets rendered as a literal in html?

> +
> +If those requirements are met, the capability "KVM_CAP_S390_PROTECTED"

`KVM_CAP_S390_PROTECTED`

> +will indicate that KVM can support PVMs on that LPAR.
> +
> +
> +QEMU Settings
> +-------------
> +To indicate to the VM that it can move into protected mode, the
> +"Unpack facility" (stfle bit 161) needs to be part of the cpu model of
> +the VM.

Add an example invocation here?

> +
> +All I/O devices need to use the IOMMU.
> +Passthrough devices are currently not supported.

s/Passthrough devices/Passthrough (vfio) devices/ ?

> +
> +Host huge page backings are not supported. The guest however can use
> +huge pages as indicated by its facilities.
> +
> +
> +Boot Process
> +-----------------

Underlining too long :)

> +A secure guest image can be booted from disk and using the QEMU

"can be both booted from..." ?

> +command line. Booting from disk is done by the unmodified s390-ccw
> +BIOS. I.e., the bootmap is interpreted and a number of components is
> +read into memory and control is transferred to one of the components
> +(zipl stage3), which does some fixups and then transfers control to
> +some program residing in guest memory, which is normally the OS
> +kernel. The secure image has another component prepended (stage3a)
> +which uses the new diag308 subcodes 8 and 10 to trigger the transition
> +into secure mode.
> +
> +Booting from the command line requires that the file passed
> +via -kernel has the same memory layout as would result from the disk
> +boot. This memory layout includes the encrypted components (kernel,
> +initrd, cmdline), the stage3a loader and metadata. In case this boot
> +method is used, the command line options -initrd and -cmdline are
> +ineffective.  The preparation of secure guest image is done by a
> +program (name tbd) of the s390-tools package.

Hm... do you have an ETA for that tbd program?



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 02/16] s390x: protvirt: Add diag308 subcodes 8 - 10
  2020-02-21  9:49   ` Cornelia Huck
@ 2020-02-21 11:42     ` Janosch Frank
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 32+ messages in thread
From: Janosch Frank @ 2020-02-21 11:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Cornelia Huck; +Cc: qemu-s390x, mihajlov, qemu-devel, david


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3016 bytes --]

On 2/21/20 10:49 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Feb 2020 07:56:24 -0500
> Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
>> For diag308 subcodes 8 - 10 we have a new ipib of type 5. The ipib
>> holds the address and length of the secure execution header, as well
>> as a list of guest components.
>>
>> Each component is a block of memory, for example kernel or initrd,
>> which needs to be decrypted by the Ultravisor in order to run a
>> protected VM. The secure execution header instructs the Ultravisor on
>> how to handle the protected VM and its components.
>>
>> Subcodes 8 and 9 are similiar to 5 and 6 and subcode 10 will finally
>> start the protected guest.
>>
>> Subcodes 8-10 are not valid in protected mode, we have to do a subcode
>> 3 and then the 8 and 10 combination for a protected reboot.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>  hw/s390x/ipl.c      | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>>  hw/s390x/ipl.h      | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  target/s390x/diag.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++---
>>  3 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/s390x/ipl.c b/hw/s390x/ipl.c
>> index 7773499d7f..e92d989813 100644
>> --- a/hw/s390x/ipl.c
>> +++ b/hw/s390x/ipl.c
>> @@ -538,15 +538,56 @@ static bool is_virtio_scsi_device(IplParameterBlock *iplb)
>>      return is_virtio_ccw_device_of_type(iplb, VIRTIO_ID_SCSI);
>>  }
>>  
>> +int s390_ipl_pv_check_components(IplParameterBlock *iplb)
>> +{
>> +    int i;
>> +    IPLBlockPV *ipib_pv = &iplb->pv;
>> +
>> +    if (ipib_pv->num_comp == 0) {
>> +        return -EINVAL;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    for (i = 0; i < ipib_pv->num_comp; i++) {
>> +
>> +        /* Addr must be 4k aligned */
>> +        if (ipib_pv->components[i].addr & ~TARGET_PAGE_MASK) {
>> +            return -EINVAL;
>> +        }
>> +
>> +        /* Tweak prefix is monotonously increasing with each component */
>> +        if (i < ipib_pv->num_comp - 1 &&
>> +            ipib_pv->components[i].tweak_pref >
>> +            ipib_pv->components[i + 1].tweak_pref) {
>> +            return -EINVAL;
>> +        }
>> +    }
>> +    return 1;
> 
> Any reason why you return 1 here? 0 vs negative error is the more usual
> pattern.

I honestly have no idea, will fix :)

> 
>> +}
>> +
> 
> (...)
> 
>> @@ -117,7 +123,8 @@ void handle_diag_308(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t r1, uint64_t r3, uintptr_t ra)
>>  
>>          cpu_physical_memory_read(addr, iplb, be32_to_cpu(iplb->len));
>>  
>> -        if (!iplb_valid_ccw(iplb) && !iplb_valid_fcp(iplb)) {
>> +        if (!iplb_valid_ccw(iplb) && !iplb_valid_fcp(iplb) &&
>> +            !(iplb_valid_pv(iplb) && s390_ipl_pv_check_components(iplb) >= 0)) {
> 
> !s390_ipl_pv_check_components() would also read nicer IMHO :)
> 
>>              env->regs[r1 + 1] = DIAG_308_RC_INVALID;
>>              goto out;
>>          }
> 
> Otherwise, looks good to me.
> 
> 



[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 03/16] s390x: protvirt: Support unpack facility
  2020-02-20 12:56 ` [PATCH v4 03/16] s390x: protvirt: Support unpack facility Janosch Frank
@ 2020-02-24 14:13   ` Christian Borntraeger
  2020-02-24 14:25     ` Janosch Frank
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 32+ messages in thread
From: Christian Borntraeger @ 2020-02-24 14:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Janosch Frank, qemu-devel; +Cc: cohuck, qemu-s390x, mihajlov, david



On 20.02.20 13:56, Janosch Frank wrote:
> When a guest has saved a ipib of type 5 and calls diagnose308 with
> subcode 10, we have to setup the protected processing environment via
> Ultravisor calls. The calls are done by KVM and are exposed via an
> API.
> 
> The following steps are necessary:
> 1. Create a VM (register it with the Ultravisor)
> 2. Create secure CPUs for all of our current cpus

maybe rephrase that to reflect the enable/disable change?

> 3. Forward the secure header to the Ultravisor (has all information on
> how to decrypt the image and VM information)
> 4. Protect image pages from the host and decrypt them
> 5. Verify the image integrity
> 
> Only after step 5 a protected VM is allowed to run.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> [Changes
> to machine]

[...]

> diff --git a/hw/s390x/pv.c b/hw/s390x/pv.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..8ae20f31c1
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/hw/s390x/pv.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,106 @@
> +/*
> + * Secure execution functions
> + *
> + * Copyright IBM Corp. 2020
> + * Author(s):
> + *  Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
> + *
> + * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2 or (at
> + * your option) any later version. See the COPYING file in the top-level
> + * directory.
> + */
> +#include "qemu/osdep.h"
> +#include <sys/ioctl.h>
> +
> +#include <linux/kvm.h>
> +
> +#include "qemu/error-report.h"
> +#include "sysemu/kvm.h"
> +#include "pv.h"
> +
> +const char *cmd_names[] = {
> +    "VM_CREATE",
> +    "VM_DESTROY",

ENABLE/DISABLE?

> +    "VM_SET_SEC_PARAMS",
> +    "VM_UNPACK",
> +    "VM_VERIFY",
> +    "VM_PREP_RESET",
> +    "VM_UNSHARE_ALL",
> +    NULL
> +};

Wild idea. Not sure if this is acceptable in QEMU.

These strings are only for the error_report, no?
Could we use a MACRO that uses this a as a string and b as the inter value?

-static int s390_pv_cmd(uint32_t cmd, void *data)
+#define S390_PV_CMD(cmd, data) s390_pv_cmd(cmd, #cmd, data)
+static int s390_pv_cmd(uint32_t cmd, const char *name, void *data)


and then replace all calls with S390_PV_CMD. (Of course also change the
error report to use name).

> +
> +static int s390_pv_cmd(uint32_t cmd, void *data)
> +{
> +    int rc;
> +    struct kvm_pv_cmd pv_cmd = {
> +        .cmd = cmd,
> +        .data = (uint64_t)data,
> +    };
> +
> +    rc = kvm_vm_ioctl(kvm_state, KVM_S390_PV_COMMAND, &pv_cmd);
> +    if (rc) {
> +        error_report("KVM PV command %d (%s) failed: header rc %x rrc %x "
> +                     "IOCTL rc: %d", cmd, cmd_names[cmd], pv_cmd.rc, pv_cmd.rrc,
> +                     rc);
> +    }
> +    return rc;
> +}
[...]

Maybe also change the subject. We do more than just unpack.



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 03/16] s390x: protvirt: Support unpack facility
  2020-02-24 14:13   ` Christian Borntraeger
@ 2020-02-24 14:25     ` Janosch Frank
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 32+ messages in thread
From: Janosch Frank @ 2020-02-24 14:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christian Borntraeger, qemu-devel; +Cc: cohuck, qemu-s390x, mihajlov, david


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3139 bytes --]

On 2/24/20 3:13 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> 
> 
> On 20.02.20 13:56, Janosch Frank wrote:
>> When a guest has saved a ipib of type 5 and calls diagnose308 with
>> subcode 10, we have to setup the protected processing environment via
>> Ultravisor calls. The calls are done by KVM and are exposed via an
>> API.
>>
>> The following steps are necessary:
>> 1. Create a VM (register it with the Ultravisor)
>> 2. Create secure CPUs for all of our current cpus
> 
> maybe rephrase that to reflect the enable/disable change?

Yep

> 
>> 3. Forward the secure header to the Ultravisor (has all information on
>> how to decrypt the image and VM information)
>> 4. Protect image pages from the host and decrypt them
>> 5. Verify the image integrity
>>
>> Only after step 5 a protected VM is allowed to run.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> [Changes
>> to machine]
> 
> [...]
> 
>> diff --git a/hw/s390x/pv.c b/hw/s390x/pv.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000000..8ae20f31c1
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/hw/s390x/pv.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,106 @@
>> +/*
>> + * Secure execution functions
>> + *
>> + * Copyright IBM Corp. 2020
>> + * Author(s):
>> + *  Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
>> + *
>> + * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2 or (at
>> + * your option) any later version. See the COPYING file in the top-level
>> + * directory.
>> + */
>> +#include "qemu/osdep.h"
>> +#include <sys/ioctl.h>
>> +
>> +#include <linux/kvm.h>
>> +
>> +#include "qemu/error-report.h"
>> +#include "sysemu/kvm.h"
>> +#include "pv.h"
>> +
>> +const char *cmd_names[] = {
>> +    "VM_CREATE",
>> +    "VM_DESTROY",
> 
> ENABLE/DISABLE?

Ack.

> 
>> +    "VM_SET_SEC_PARAMS",
>> +    "VM_UNPACK",
>> +    "VM_VERIFY",
>> +    "VM_PREP_RESET",
>> +    "VM_UNSHARE_ALL",
>> +    NULL
>> +};
> 
> Wild idea. Not sure if this is acceptable in QEMU.
> 
> These strings are only for the error_report, no?
> Could we use a MACRO that uses this a as a string and b as the inter value?
> 
> -static int s390_pv_cmd(uint32_t cmd, void *data)
> +#define S390_PV_CMD(cmd, data) s390_pv_cmd(cmd, #cmd, data)
> +static int s390_pv_cmd(uint32_t cmd, const char *name, void *data)
> 
> 
> and then replace all calls with S390_PV_CMD. (Of course also change the
> error report to use name).
> 
>> +
>> +static int s390_pv_cmd(uint32_t cmd, void *data)
>> +{
>> +    int rc;
>> +    struct kvm_pv_cmd pv_cmd = {
>> +        .cmd = cmd,
>> +        .data = (uint64_t)data,
>> +    };
>> +
>> +    rc = kvm_vm_ioctl(kvm_state, KVM_S390_PV_COMMAND, &pv_cmd);
>> +    if (rc) {
>> +        error_report("KVM PV command %d (%s) failed: header rc %x rrc %x "
>> +                     "IOCTL rc: %d", cmd, cmd_names[cmd], pv_cmd.rc, pv_cmd.rrc,
>> +                     rc);
>> +    }
>> +    return rc;
>> +}
> [...]
> 
> Maybe also change the subject. We do more than just unpack.
> 

The name is not about unpack, it's about the unpack facility



[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 01/16] Sync pv
  2020-02-20 12:56 ` [PATCH v4 01/16] Sync pv Janosch Frank
@ 2020-02-25  9:42   ` David Hildenbrand
  2020-02-25 11:10     ` Janosch Frank
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 32+ messages in thread
From: David Hildenbrand @ 2020-02-25  9:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Janosch Frank, qemu-devel; +Cc: qemu-s390x, mihajlov, cohuck

On 20.02.20 13:56, Janosch Frank wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  linux-headers/linux/kvm.h | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/linux-headers/linux/kvm.h b/linux-headers/linux/kvm.h
> index ec146bd52a..2e647f2d9b 100644
> --- a/linux-headers/linux/kvm.h
> +++ b/linux-headers/linux/kvm.h
> @@ -474,8 +474,11 @@ struct kvm_s390_mem_op {
>  	__u32 size;		/* amount of bytes */
>  	__u32 op;		/* type of operation */
>  	__u64 buf;		/* buffer in userspace */
> -	__u8 ar;		/* the access register number */
> -	__u8 reserved[31];	/* should be set to 0 */
> +	union {
> +		__u8 ar;	/* the access register number */
> +		__u32 sida_offset; /* offset into the sida */
> +		__u8 reserved[32]; /* should be set to 0 */
> +	};
>  };
>  /* types for kvm_s390_mem_op->op */
>  #define KVM_S390_MEMOP_LOGICAL_READ	0
> @@ -1010,6 +1013,7 @@ struct kvm_ppc_resize_hpt {
>  #define KVM_CAP_ARM_NISV_TO_USER 177
>  #define KVM_CAP_ARM_INJECT_EXT_DABT 178
>  #define KVM_CAP_S390_VCPU_RESETS 179
> +#define KVM_CAP_S390_PROTECTED 180
>  
>  #ifdef KVM_CAP_IRQ_ROUTING
>  
> @@ -1474,8 +1478,42 @@ struct kvm_enc_region {
>  /* Available with KVM_CAP_ARM_SVE */
>  #define KVM_ARM_VCPU_FINALIZE	  _IOW(KVMIO,  0xc2, int)
>  
> -#define KVM_S390_NORMAL_RESET	  _IO(KVMIO,  0xc3)
> -#define KVM_S390_CLEAR_RESET	  _IO(KVMIO,  0xc4)
> +/* Available with  KVM_CAP_S390_VCPU_RESETS */
> +#define KVM_S390_NORMAL_RESET	_IO(KVMIO,   0xc3)
> +#define KVM_S390_CLEAR_RESET	_IO(KVMIO,   0xc4)

Looks unrelated, but if that's part of the sync ...


-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 04/16] s390x: protvirt: Add migration blocker
  2020-02-20 12:56 ` [PATCH v4 04/16] s390x: protvirt: Add migration blocker Janosch Frank
@ 2020-02-25  9:50   ` David Hildenbrand
  2020-02-25 11:21     ` Janosch Frank
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 32+ messages in thread
From: David Hildenbrand @ 2020-02-25  9:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Janosch Frank, qemu-devel; +Cc: qemu-s390x, mihajlov, cohuck

On 20.02.20 13:56, Janosch Frank wrote:
> Migration is not yet supported.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c | 17 ++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
> index aa974d294e..6fba8d9331 100644
> --- a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
> +++ b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
> @@ -42,6 +42,9 @@
>  #include "hw/s390x/tod.h"
>  #include "sysemu/sysemu.h"
>  #include "hw/s390x/pv.h"
> +#include "migration/blocker.h"
> +
> +static Error *pv_mig_blocker;
>  
>  S390CPU *s390_cpu_addr2state(uint16_t cpu_addr)
>  {
> @@ -387,6 +390,7 @@ static void s390_machine_reset(MachineState *machine)
>      CPUState *cs, *t;
>      S390CPU *cpu;
>      S390CcwMachineState *ms = S390_CCW_MACHINE(machine);
> +    static Error *local_err;
>  
>      /* get the reset parameters, reset them once done */
>      s390_ipl_get_reset_request(&cs, &reset_type);
> @@ -436,13 +440,20 @@ static void s390_machine_reset(MachineState *machine)
>          }
>          run_on_cpu(cs, s390_do_cpu_reset, RUN_ON_CPU_NULL);
>  
> -        if (s390_machine_protect(ms)) {
> +        if (!pv_mig_blocker) {
> +            error_setg(&pv_mig_blocker,
> +                       "protected VMs are currently not migrateable.");
> +        }
> +        migrate_add_blocker(pv_mig_blocker, &local_err);
> +        if (!local_err && s390_machine_protect(ms)) {
>              s390_machine_inject_pv_error(cs);
> -            s390_cpu_set_state(S390_CPU_STATE_OPERATING, cpu);
> -            return;
> +            migrate_del_blocker(pv_mig_blocker);
> +            goto pv_err;
>          }

I'm sorry, but that looks ... a little to interesting to me. Why can't
you register/unregister the blocker where you actually perform the
switch to/from PV?

>  
>          run_on_cpu(cs, s390_do_cpu_load_normal, RUN_ON_CPU_NULL);
> +pv_err:
> +        s390_cpu_set_state(S390_CPU_STATE_OPERATING, cpu);
>          break;
>      default:
>          g_assert_not_reached();
> 


-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 15/16] s390x: Add unpack feature to GA1
  2020-02-20 12:56 ` [PATCH v4 15/16] s390x: Add unpack feature to GA1 Janosch Frank
@ 2020-02-25  9:53   ` David Hildenbrand
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 32+ messages in thread
From: David Hildenbrand @ 2020-02-25  9:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Janosch Frank, qemu-devel; +Cc: qemu-s390x, mihajlov, cohuck

On 20.02.20 13:56, Janosch Frank wrote:
> From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
> 

Needs some love. What does the facility unlock/allow. Why can we enable
it now. What's in place, what's missing.

> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
> ---
>  target/s390x/gen-features.c | 1 +
>  target/s390x/kvm.c          | 7 +++++++
>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/target/s390x/gen-features.c b/target/s390x/gen-features.c
> index 6278845b12..8ddeebc544 100644
> --- a/target/s390x/gen-features.c
> +++ b/target/s390x/gen-features.c
> @@ -562,6 +562,7 @@ static uint16_t full_GEN15_GA1[] = {
>      S390_FEAT_GROUP_MSA_EXT_9,
>      S390_FEAT_GROUP_MSA_EXT_9_PCKMO,
>      S390_FEAT_ETOKEN,
> +    S390_FEAT_UNPACK,
>  };
>  
>  /* Default features (in order of release)
> diff --git a/target/s390x/kvm.c b/target/s390x/kvm.c
> index 31dd49729b..5b6a7ca466 100644
> --- a/target/s390x/kvm.c
> +++ b/target/s390x/kvm.c
> @@ -154,6 +154,7 @@ static int cap_ri;
>  static int cap_gs;
>  static int cap_hpage_1m;
>  static int cap_vcpu_resets;
> +static int cap_protected;
>  
>  static int active_cmma;
>  
> @@ -346,6 +347,7 @@ int kvm_arch_init(MachineState *ms, KVMState *s)
>      cap_mem_op = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_S390_MEM_OP);
>      cap_s390_irq = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_S390_INJECT_IRQ);
>      cap_vcpu_resets = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_S390_VCPU_RESETS);
> +    cap_protected = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_S390_PROTECTED);
>  
>      if (!kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_S390_GMAP)
>          || !kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_S390_COW)) {
> @@ -2394,6 +2396,11 @@ void kvm_s390_get_host_cpu_model(S390CPUModel *model, Error **errp)
>          clear_bit(S390_FEAT_BPB, model->features);
>      }
>  
> +    /* we do have the IPL enhancements */
> +    if (cap_protected) {
> +        set_bit(S390_FEAT_UNPACK, model->features);
> +    }
> +
>      /* We emulate a zPCI bus and AEN, therefore we don't need HW support */
>      set_bit(S390_FEAT_ZPCI, model->features);
>      set_bit(S390_FEAT_ADAPTER_EVENT_NOTIFICATION, model->features);
> 

In general, LGTM.

-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 07/16] s390x: Add SIDA memory ops
  2020-02-20 12:56 ` [PATCH v4 07/16] s390x: Add SIDA memory ops Janosch Frank
@ 2020-02-25  9:59   ` David Hildenbrand
  2020-02-25 11:27     ` Janosch Frank
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 32+ messages in thread
From: David Hildenbrand @ 2020-02-25  9:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Janosch Frank, qemu-devel; +Cc: qemu-s390x, mihajlov, cohuck

On 20.02.20 13:56, Janosch Frank wrote:
> Protected guests save the instruction control blocks in the SIDA
> instead of QEMU/KVM directly accessing the guest's memory.
> 
> Let's introduce new functions to access the SIDA.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  linux-headers/linux/kvm.h |  2 ++
>  target/s390x/cpu.h        |  7 ++++++-
>  target/s390x/kvm.c        | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>  target/s390x/kvm_s390x.h  |  2 ++
>  target/s390x/mmu_helper.c |  9 +++++++++
>  5 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/linux-headers/linux/kvm.h b/linux-headers/linux/kvm.h
> index 2e647f2d9b..7ccf5988d2 100644
> --- a/linux-headers/linux/kvm.h
> +++ b/linux-headers/linux/kvm.h
> @@ -483,6 +483,8 @@ struct kvm_s390_mem_op {
>  /* types for kvm_s390_mem_op->op */
>  #define KVM_S390_MEMOP_LOGICAL_READ	0
>  #define KVM_S390_MEMOP_LOGICAL_WRITE	1
> +#define KVM_S390_MEMOP_SIDA_READ	2
> +#define KVM_S390_MEMOP_SIDA_WRITE	3
>  /* flags for kvm_s390_mem_op->flags */
>  #define KVM_S390_MEMOP_F_CHECK_ONLY		(1ULL << 0)
>  #define KVM_S390_MEMOP_F_INJECT_EXCEPTION	(1ULL << 1)
> diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu.h b/target/s390x/cpu.h
> index cbc53c99cf..491d6860a8 100644
> --- a/target/s390x/cpu.h
> +++ b/target/s390x/cpu.h
> @@ -823,7 +823,12 @@ int s390_cpu_virt_mem_rw(S390CPU *cpu, vaddr laddr, uint8_t ar, void *hostbuf,
>  #define s390_cpu_virt_mem_check_write(cpu, laddr, ar, len)   \
>          s390_cpu_virt_mem_rw(cpu, laddr, ar, NULL, len, true)
>  void s390_cpu_virt_mem_handle_exc(S390CPU *cpu, uintptr_t ra);
> -
> +int s390_cpu_pv_mem_rw(S390CPU *cpu, unsigned int offset,  void *hostbuf,
> +                       int len, bool is_write);
> +#define s390_cpu_pv_mem_read(cpu, offset, dest, len)    \
> +        s390_cpu_pv_mem_rw(cpu, offset, dest, len, false)
> +#define s390_cpu_pv_mem_write(cpu, offset, dest, len)       \
> +        s390_cpu_pv_mem_rw(cpu, offset, dest, len, true)
>  
>  /* sigp.c */
>  int s390_cpu_restart(S390CPU *cpu);
> diff --git a/target/s390x/kvm.c b/target/s390x/kvm.c
> index eec0b92479..f222836df5 100644
> --- a/target/s390x/kvm.c
> +++ b/target/s390x/kvm.c
> @@ -846,6 +846,29 @@ int kvm_s390_mem_op(S390CPU *cpu, vaddr addr, uint8_t ar, void *hostbuf,
>      return ret;
>  }
>  
> +int kvm_s390_mem_op_pv(S390CPU *cpu, uint64_t offset, void *hostbuf,
> +                       int len, bool is_write)
> +{
> +    int ret = 0;

move that after the struct declaration/definition. No need to initialize
to 0.

> +    struct kvm_s390_mem_op mem_op = {
> +        .sida_offset = offset,
> +        .size = len,
> +        .op = is_write ? KVM_S390_MEMOP_SIDA_WRITE
> +                       : KVM_S390_MEMOP_SIDA_READ,
> +        .buf = (uint64_t)hostbuf,
> +    };
> +
> +    if (!cap_mem_op) {
> +        return -ENOSYS;
> +    }

if (!cap_mem_op || !cap_protected)

And move cap_protected from patch 15 in here.

> +
> +    ret = kvm_vcpu_ioctl(CPU(cpu), KVM_S390_MEM_OP, &mem_op);
> +    if (ret < 0) {
> +        warn_report("KVM_S390_MEM_OP failed: %s", strerror(-ret));

I'd even error_report(). After all, this should never fail.

> +    }
> +    return ret;
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Legacy layout for s390:
>   * Older S390 KVM requires the topmost vma of the RAM to be
> diff --git a/target/s390x/kvm_s390x.h b/target/s390x/kvm_s390x.h
> index 0b21789796..9c38f6ccce 100644
> --- a/target/s390x/kvm_s390x.h
> +++ b/target/s390x/kvm_s390x.h
> @@ -19,6 +19,8 @@ void kvm_s390_vcpu_interrupt(S390CPU *cpu, struct kvm_s390_irq *irq);
>  void kvm_s390_access_exception(S390CPU *cpu, uint16_t code, uint64_t te_code);
>  int kvm_s390_mem_op(S390CPU *cpu, vaddr addr, uint8_t ar, void *hostbuf,
>                      int len, bool is_write);
> +int kvm_s390_mem_op_pv(S390CPU *cpu, vaddr addr, void *hostbuf, int len,
> +                       bool is_write);
>  void kvm_s390_program_interrupt(S390CPU *cpu, uint16_t code);
>  int kvm_s390_set_cpu_state(S390CPU *cpu, uint8_t cpu_state);
>  void kvm_s390_vcpu_interrupt_pre_save(S390CPU *cpu);
> diff --git a/target/s390x/mmu_helper.c b/target/s390x/mmu_helper.c
> index c9f3f34750..ad485399db 100644
> --- a/target/s390x/mmu_helper.c
> +++ b/target/s390x/mmu_helper.c
> @@ -474,6 +474,15 @@ static int translate_pages(S390CPU *cpu, vaddr addr, int nr_pages,
>      return 0;
>  }
>  
> +int s390_cpu_pv_mem_rw(S390CPU *cpu, unsigned int offset, void *hostbuf,
> +                       int len, bool is_write)
> +{
> +    int ret;
> +
> +    ret = kvm_s390_mem_op_pv(cpu, offset, hostbuf, len, is_write);
> +    return ret;

if (kvm_enabled()) {
...
} else {
    /* Helpful comment */
    g_assert_not_reached();
}


-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 06/16] s390x: protvirt: KVM intercept changes
  2020-02-20 12:56 ` [PATCH v4 06/16] s390x: protvirt: KVM intercept changes Janosch Frank
@ 2020-02-25 10:01   ` David Hildenbrand
  2020-02-25 11:33     ` Janosch Frank
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 32+ messages in thread
From: David Hildenbrand @ 2020-02-25 10:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Janosch Frank, qemu-devel; +Cc: qemu-s390x, mihajlov, cohuck

On 20.02.20 13:56, Janosch Frank wrote:
> Secure guests no longer intercept with code 4 for an instruction
> interception. Instead they have codes 104 and 108 for secure
> instruction interception and secure instruction notification
> respectively.
> 
> The 104 mirrors the 4 interception.
> 
> The 108 is a notification interception to let KVM and QEMU know that
> something changed and we need to update tracking information or
> perform specific tasks. It's currently taken for the following
> instructions:
> 
> * stpx (To inform about the changed prefix location)
> * sclp (On incorrect SCCB values, so we can inject a IRQ)
> * sigp (All but "stop and store status")
> * diag308 (Subcodes 0/1)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  target/s390x/kvm.c | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/target/s390x/kvm.c b/target/s390x/kvm.c
> index 1d6fd6a27b..eec0b92479 100644
> --- a/target/s390x/kvm.c
> +++ b/target/s390x/kvm.c
> @@ -115,6 +115,8 @@
>  #define ICPT_CPU_STOP                   0x28
>  #define ICPT_OPEREXC                    0x2c
>  #define ICPT_IO                         0x40
> +#define ICPT_PV_INSTR                   0x68
> +#define ICPT_PV_INSTR_NOTIFICATION      0x6c
>  
>  #define NR_LOCAL_IRQS 32
>  /*
> @@ -1693,6 +1695,8 @@ static int handle_intercept(S390CPU *cpu)
>              (long)cs->kvm_run->psw_addr);
>      switch (icpt_code) {
>          case ICPT_INSTRUCTION:
> +        case ICPT_PV_INSTR:
> +        case ICPT_PV_INSTR_NOTIFICATION:
>              r = handle_instruction(cpu, run);
>              break;
>          case ICPT_PROGRAM:
> 

Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>

-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 08/16] s390x: protvirt: Move STSI data over SIDAD
  2020-02-20 12:56 ` [PATCH v4 08/16] s390x: protvirt: Move STSI data over SIDAD Janosch Frank
@ 2020-02-25 10:05   ` David Hildenbrand
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 32+ messages in thread
From: David Hildenbrand @ 2020-02-25 10:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Janosch Frank, qemu-devel; +Cc: qemu-s390x, mihajlov, cohuck

On 20.02.20 13:56, Janosch Frank wrote:
> For protected guests, we need to put the STSI emulation results into
> the SIDA, so SIE will write them into the guest at the next entry.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  target/s390x/kvm.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/target/s390x/kvm.c b/target/s390x/kvm.c
> index f222836df5..3a5a5146e3 100644
> --- a/target/s390x/kvm.c
> +++ b/target/s390x/kvm.c
> @@ -1795,11 +1795,16 @@ static int handle_tsch(S390CPU *cpu)
>  
>  static void insert_stsi_3_2_2(S390CPU *cpu, __u64 addr, uint8_t ar)
>  {
> +    CPUS390XState *env = &cpu->env;
>      SysIB_322 sysib;
>      int del;
>  
> -    if (s390_cpu_virt_mem_read(cpu, addr, ar, &sysib, sizeof(sysib))) {
> -        return;
> +    if (env->pv) {
> +        s390_cpu_pv_mem_read(cpu, 0, &sysib, sizeof(sysib));
> +    } else {
> +        if (s390_cpu_virt_mem_read(cpu, addr, ar, &sysib, sizeof(sysib))) {
> +            return;
> +        }
>      }
>      /* Shift the stack of Extended Names to prepare for our own data */
>      memmove(&sysib.ext_names[1], &sysib.ext_names[0],
> @@ -1838,7 +1843,11 @@ static void insert_stsi_3_2_2(S390CPU *cpu, __u64 addr, uint8_t ar)
>      /* Insert UUID */
>      memcpy(sysib.vm[0].uuid, &qemu_uuid, sizeof(sysib.vm[0].uuid));
>  
> -    s390_cpu_virt_mem_write(cpu, addr, ar, &sysib, sizeof(sysib));
> +    if (env->pv) {
> +        s390_cpu_pv_mem_write(cpu, 0, &sysib, sizeof(sysib));
> +    } else {
> +        s390_cpu_virt_mem_write(cpu, addr, ar, &sysib, sizeof(sysib));
> +    }
>  }
>  
>  static int handle_stsi(S390CPU *cpu)
> 

Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>

-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 01/16] Sync pv
  2020-02-25  9:42   ` David Hildenbrand
@ 2020-02-25 11:10     ` Janosch Frank
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 32+ messages in thread
From: Janosch Frank @ 2020-02-25 11:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Hildenbrand, qemu-devel; +Cc: qemu-s390x, mihajlov, cohuck


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1851 bytes --]

On 2/25/20 10:42 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 20.02.20 13:56, Janosch Frank wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>  linux-headers/linux/kvm.h | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>>  1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/linux-headers/linux/kvm.h b/linux-headers/linux/kvm.h
>> index ec146bd52a..2e647f2d9b 100644
>> --- a/linux-headers/linux/kvm.h
>> +++ b/linux-headers/linux/kvm.h
>> @@ -474,8 +474,11 @@ struct kvm_s390_mem_op {
>>  	__u32 size;		/* amount of bytes */
>>  	__u32 op;		/* type of operation */
>>  	__u64 buf;		/* buffer in userspace */
>> -	__u8 ar;		/* the access register number */
>> -	__u8 reserved[31];	/* should be set to 0 */
>> +	union {
>> +		__u8 ar;	/* the access register number */
>> +		__u32 sida_offset; /* offset into the sida */
>> +		__u8 reserved[32]; /* should be set to 0 */
>> +	};
>>  };
>>  /* types for kvm_s390_mem_op->op */
>>  #define KVM_S390_MEMOP_LOGICAL_READ	0
>> @@ -1010,6 +1013,7 @@ struct kvm_ppc_resize_hpt {
>>  #define KVM_CAP_ARM_NISV_TO_USER 177
>>  #define KVM_CAP_ARM_INJECT_EXT_DABT 178
>>  #define KVM_CAP_S390_VCPU_RESETS 179
>> +#define KVM_CAP_S390_PROTECTED 180
>>  
>>  #ifdef KVM_CAP_IRQ_ROUTING
>>  
>> @@ -1474,8 +1478,42 @@ struct kvm_enc_region {
>>  /* Available with KVM_CAP_ARM_SVE */
>>  #define KVM_ARM_VCPU_FINALIZE	  _IOW(KVMIO,  0xc2, int)
>>  
>> -#define KVM_S390_NORMAL_RESET	  _IO(KVMIO,  0xc3)
>> -#define KVM_S390_CLEAR_RESET	  _IO(KVMIO,  0xc4)
>> +/* Available with  KVM_CAP_S390_VCPU_RESETS */
>> +#define KVM_S390_NORMAL_RESET	_IO(KVMIO,   0xc3)
>> +#define KVM_S390_CLEAR_RESET	_IO(KVMIO,   0xc4)
> 
> Looks unrelated, but if that's part of the sync ...
> 

Yeah, that doesn't belong here and was already removed a few days ago.



[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 04/16] s390x: protvirt: Add migration blocker
  2020-02-25  9:50   ` David Hildenbrand
@ 2020-02-25 11:21     ` Janosch Frank
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 32+ messages in thread
From: Janosch Frank @ 2020-02-25 11:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Hildenbrand, qemu-devel; +Cc: qemu-s390x, mihajlov, cohuck


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2437 bytes --]

On 2/25/20 10:50 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 20.02.20 13:56, Janosch Frank wrote:
>> Migration is not yet supported.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>  hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c | 17 ++++++++++++++---
>>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
>> index aa974d294e..6fba8d9331 100644
>> --- a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
>> +++ b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
>> @@ -42,6 +42,9 @@
>>  #include "hw/s390x/tod.h"
>>  #include "sysemu/sysemu.h"
>>  #include "hw/s390x/pv.h"
>> +#include "migration/blocker.h"
>> +
>> +static Error *pv_mig_blocker;
>>  
>>  S390CPU *s390_cpu_addr2state(uint16_t cpu_addr)
>>  {
>> @@ -387,6 +390,7 @@ static void s390_machine_reset(MachineState *machine)
>>      CPUState *cs, *t;
>>      S390CPU *cpu;
>>      S390CcwMachineState *ms = S390_CCW_MACHINE(machine);
>> +    static Error *local_err;
>>  
>>      /* get the reset parameters, reset them once done */
>>      s390_ipl_get_reset_request(&cs, &reset_type);
>> @@ -436,13 +440,20 @@ static void s390_machine_reset(MachineState *machine)
>>          }
>>          run_on_cpu(cs, s390_do_cpu_reset, RUN_ON_CPU_NULL);
>>  
>> -        if (s390_machine_protect(ms)) {
>> +        if (!pv_mig_blocker) {
>> +            error_setg(&pv_mig_blocker,
>> +                       "protected VMs are currently not migrateable.");
>> +        }
>> +        migrate_add_blocker(pv_mig_blocker, &local_err);
>> +        if (!local_err && s390_machine_protect(ms)) {
>>              s390_machine_inject_pv_error(cs);
>> -            s390_cpu_set_state(S390_CPU_STATE_OPERATING, cpu);
>> -            return;
>> +            migrate_del_blocker(pv_mig_blocker);
>> +            goto pv_err;
>>          }
> 
> I'm sorry, but that looks ... a little to interesting to me. Why can't
> you register/unregister the blocker where you actually perform the
> switch to/from PV?

The sprinkled over PV lines annoyed me anyway, so I added a unprotect()
function yesterday and now also moved the migration blocker into
protect() and unprotect()

> 
>>  
>>          run_on_cpu(cs, s390_do_cpu_load_normal, RUN_ON_CPU_NULL);
>> +pv_err:
>> +        s390_cpu_set_state(S390_CPU_STATE_OPERATING, cpu);
>>          break;
>>      default:
>>          g_assert_not_reached();
>>
> 
> 



[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 07/16] s390x: Add SIDA memory ops
  2020-02-25  9:59   ` David Hildenbrand
@ 2020-02-25 11:27     ` Janosch Frank
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 32+ messages in thread
From: Janosch Frank @ 2020-02-25 11:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Hildenbrand, qemu-devel; +Cc: qemu-s390x, mihajlov, cohuck


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5175 bytes --]

On 2/25/20 10:59 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 20.02.20 13:56, Janosch Frank wrote:
>> Protected guests save the instruction control blocks in the SIDA
>> instead of QEMU/KVM directly accessing the guest's memory.
>>
>> Let's introduce new functions to access the SIDA.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>  linux-headers/linux/kvm.h |  2 ++
>>  target/s390x/cpu.h        |  7 ++++++-
>>  target/s390x/kvm.c        | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  target/s390x/kvm_s390x.h  |  2 ++
>>  target/s390x/mmu_helper.c |  9 +++++++++
>>  5 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/linux-headers/linux/kvm.h b/linux-headers/linux/kvm.h
>> index 2e647f2d9b..7ccf5988d2 100644
>> --- a/linux-headers/linux/kvm.h
>> +++ b/linux-headers/linux/kvm.h
>> @@ -483,6 +483,8 @@ struct kvm_s390_mem_op {
>>  /* types for kvm_s390_mem_op->op */
>>  #define KVM_S390_MEMOP_LOGICAL_READ	0
>>  #define KVM_S390_MEMOP_LOGICAL_WRITE	1
>> +#define KVM_S390_MEMOP_SIDA_READ	2
>> +#define KVM_S390_MEMOP_SIDA_WRITE	3
>>  /* flags for kvm_s390_mem_op->flags */
>>  #define KVM_S390_MEMOP_F_CHECK_ONLY		(1ULL << 0)
>>  #define KVM_S390_MEMOP_F_INJECT_EXCEPTION	(1ULL << 1)
>> diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu.h b/target/s390x/cpu.h
>> index cbc53c99cf..491d6860a8 100644
>> --- a/target/s390x/cpu.h
>> +++ b/target/s390x/cpu.h
>> @@ -823,7 +823,12 @@ int s390_cpu_virt_mem_rw(S390CPU *cpu, vaddr laddr, uint8_t ar, void *hostbuf,
>>  #define s390_cpu_virt_mem_check_write(cpu, laddr, ar, len)   \
>>          s390_cpu_virt_mem_rw(cpu, laddr, ar, NULL, len, true)
>>  void s390_cpu_virt_mem_handle_exc(S390CPU *cpu, uintptr_t ra);
>> -
>> +int s390_cpu_pv_mem_rw(S390CPU *cpu, unsigned int offset,  void *hostbuf,
>> +                       int len, bool is_write);
>> +#define s390_cpu_pv_mem_read(cpu, offset, dest, len)    \
>> +        s390_cpu_pv_mem_rw(cpu, offset, dest, len, false)
>> +#define s390_cpu_pv_mem_write(cpu, offset, dest, len)       \
>> +        s390_cpu_pv_mem_rw(cpu, offset, dest, len, true)
>>  
>>  /* sigp.c */
>>  int s390_cpu_restart(S390CPU *cpu);
>> diff --git a/target/s390x/kvm.c b/target/s390x/kvm.c
>> index eec0b92479..f222836df5 100644
>> --- a/target/s390x/kvm.c
>> +++ b/target/s390x/kvm.c
>> @@ -846,6 +846,29 @@ int kvm_s390_mem_op(S390CPU *cpu, vaddr addr, uint8_t ar, void *hostbuf,
>>      return ret;
>>  }
>>  
>> +int kvm_s390_mem_op_pv(S390CPU *cpu, uint64_t offset, void *hostbuf,
>> +                       int len, bool is_write)
>> +{
>> +    int ret = 0;
> 
> move that after the struct declaration/definition. No need to initialize
> to 0.

Ack

> 
>> +    struct kvm_s390_mem_op mem_op = {
>> +        .sida_offset = offset,
>> +        .size = len,
>> +        .op = is_write ? KVM_S390_MEMOP_SIDA_WRITE
>> +                       : KVM_S390_MEMOP_SIDA_READ,
>> +        .buf = (uint64_t)hostbuf,
>> +    };
>> +
>> +    if (!cap_mem_op) {
>> +        return -ENOSYS;
>> +    }
> 
> if (!cap_mem_op || !cap_protected)
> 
> And move cap_protected from patch 15 in here.

Ack

> 
>> +
>> +    ret = kvm_vcpu_ioctl(CPU(cpu), KVM_S390_MEM_OP, &mem_op);
>> +    if (ret < 0) {
>> +        warn_report("KVM_S390_MEM_OP failed: %s", strerror(-ret));
> 
> I'd even error_report(). After all, this should never fail.

Hmm, might even make sense to exit here.
In my experience a failed memop will soon result in bigger problems as
it effectively stops a cpu.

> 
>> +    }
>> +    return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>>  /*
>>   * Legacy layout for s390:
>>   * Older S390 KVM requires the topmost vma of the RAM to be
>> diff --git a/target/s390x/kvm_s390x.h b/target/s390x/kvm_s390x.h
>> index 0b21789796..9c38f6ccce 100644
>> --- a/target/s390x/kvm_s390x.h
>> +++ b/target/s390x/kvm_s390x.h
>> @@ -19,6 +19,8 @@ void kvm_s390_vcpu_interrupt(S390CPU *cpu, struct kvm_s390_irq *irq);
>>  void kvm_s390_access_exception(S390CPU *cpu, uint16_t code, uint64_t te_code);
>>  int kvm_s390_mem_op(S390CPU *cpu, vaddr addr, uint8_t ar, void *hostbuf,
>>                      int len, bool is_write);
>> +int kvm_s390_mem_op_pv(S390CPU *cpu, vaddr addr, void *hostbuf, int len,
>> +                       bool is_write);
>>  void kvm_s390_program_interrupt(S390CPU *cpu, uint16_t code);
>>  int kvm_s390_set_cpu_state(S390CPU *cpu, uint8_t cpu_state);
>>  void kvm_s390_vcpu_interrupt_pre_save(S390CPU *cpu);
>> diff --git a/target/s390x/mmu_helper.c b/target/s390x/mmu_helper.c
>> index c9f3f34750..ad485399db 100644
>> --- a/target/s390x/mmu_helper.c
>> +++ b/target/s390x/mmu_helper.c
>> @@ -474,6 +474,15 @@ static int translate_pages(S390CPU *cpu, vaddr addr, int nr_pages,
>>      return 0;
>>  }
>>  
>> +int s390_cpu_pv_mem_rw(S390CPU *cpu, unsigned int offset, void *hostbuf,
>> +                       int len, bool is_write)
>> +{
>> +    int ret;
>> +
>> +    ret = kvm_s390_mem_op_pv(cpu, offset, hostbuf, len, is_write);
>> +    return ret;
> 
> if (kvm_enabled()) {
> ...
> } else {
>     /* Helpful comment */
>     g_assert_not_reached();
> }
> 

Ack.

> 



[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 06/16] s390x: protvirt: KVM intercept changes
  2020-02-25 10:01   ` David Hildenbrand
@ 2020-02-25 11:33     ` Janosch Frank
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 32+ messages in thread
From: Janosch Frank @ 2020-02-25 11:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Hildenbrand, qemu-devel; +Cc: qemu-s390x, mihajlov, cohuck


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1837 bytes --]

On 2/25/20 11:01 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 20.02.20 13:56, Janosch Frank wrote:
>> Secure guests no longer intercept with code 4 for an instruction
>> interception. Instead they have codes 104 and 108 for secure
>> instruction interception and secure instruction notification
>> respectively.
>>
>> The 104 mirrors the 4 interception.
>>
>> The 108 is a notification interception to let KVM and QEMU know that
>> something changed and we need to update tracking information or
>> perform specific tasks. It's currently taken for the following
>> instructions:
>>
>> * stpx (To inform about the changed prefix location)
>> * sclp (On incorrect SCCB values, so we can inject a IRQ)
>> * sigp (All but "stop and store status")
>> * diag308 (Subcodes 0/1)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>  target/s390x/kvm.c | 4 ++++
>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/target/s390x/kvm.c b/target/s390x/kvm.c
>> index 1d6fd6a27b..eec0b92479 100644
>> --- a/target/s390x/kvm.c
>> +++ b/target/s390x/kvm.c
>> @@ -115,6 +115,8 @@
>>  #define ICPT_CPU_STOP                   0x28
>>  #define ICPT_OPEREXC                    0x2c
>>  #define ICPT_IO                         0x40
>> +#define ICPT_PV_INSTR                   0x68
>> +#define ICPT_PV_INSTR_NOTIFICATION      0x6c
>>  
>>  #define NR_LOCAL_IRQS 32
>>  /*
>> @@ -1693,6 +1695,8 @@ static int handle_intercept(S390CPU *cpu)
>>              (long)cs->kvm_run->psw_addr);
>>      switch (icpt_code) {
>>          case ICPT_INSTRUCTION:
>> +        case ICPT_PV_INSTR:
>> +        case ICPT_PV_INSTR_NOTIFICATION:
>>              r = handle_instruction(cpu, run);
>>              break;
>>          case ICPT_PROGRAM:
>>
> 
> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> 
Thanks!


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 32+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-02-25 11:34 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-02-20 12:56 [PATCH v4 00/16] s390x: Protected Virtualization support Janosch Frank
2020-02-20 12:56 ` [PATCH v4 01/16] Sync pv Janosch Frank
2020-02-25  9:42   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-25 11:10     ` Janosch Frank
2020-02-20 12:56 ` [PATCH v4 02/16] s390x: protvirt: Add diag308 subcodes 8 - 10 Janosch Frank
2020-02-21  9:49   ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-21 11:42     ` Janosch Frank
2020-02-20 12:56 ` [PATCH v4 03/16] s390x: protvirt: Support unpack facility Janosch Frank
2020-02-24 14:13   ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-24 14:25     ` Janosch Frank
2020-02-20 12:56 ` [PATCH v4 04/16] s390x: protvirt: Add migration blocker Janosch Frank
2020-02-25  9:50   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-25 11:21     ` Janosch Frank
2020-02-20 12:56 ` [PATCH v4 05/16] s390x: protvirt: Handle diag 308 subcodes 0,1,3,4 Janosch Frank
2020-02-20 12:56 ` [PATCH v4 06/16] s390x: protvirt: KVM intercept changes Janosch Frank
2020-02-25 10:01   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-25 11:33     ` Janosch Frank
2020-02-20 12:56 ` [PATCH v4 07/16] s390x: Add SIDA memory ops Janosch Frank
2020-02-25  9:59   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-25 11:27     ` Janosch Frank
2020-02-20 12:56 ` [PATCH v4 08/16] s390x: protvirt: Move STSI data over SIDAD Janosch Frank
2020-02-25 10:05   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-20 12:56 ` [PATCH v4 09/16] s390x: protvirt: SCLP interpretation Janosch Frank
2020-02-20 12:56 ` [PATCH v4 10/16] s390x: protvirt: Set guest IPL PSW Janosch Frank
2020-02-20 12:56 ` [PATCH v4 11/16] s390x: protvirt: Move diag 308 data over SIDAD Janosch Frank
2020-02-20 12:56 ` [PATCH v4 12/16] s390x: protvirt: Disable address checks for PV guest IO emulation Janosch Frank
2020-02-20 12:56 ` [PATCH v4 13/16] s390x: protvirt: Move IO control structures over SIDA Janosch Frank
2020-02-20 12:56 ` [PATCH v4 14/16] s390x: protvirt: Handle SIGP store status correctly Janosch Frank
2020-02-20 12:56 ` [PATCH v4 15/16] s390x: Add unpack feature to GA1 Janosch Frank
2020-02-25  9:53   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-20 12:56 ` [PATCH v4 16/16] docs: Add protvirt docs Janosch Frank
2020-02-21 10:00   ` Cornelia Huck

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.