From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tom Rini Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 11:19:25 -0500 Subject: [PATCH 3/5] env/fat.c: remove private CMD_SAVEENV logic In-Reply-To: <20200221161414.CD46924005E@gemini.denx.de> References: <20200219094726.26798-1-rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk> <20200219094726.26798-4-rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk> <20200219132715.1F81A240036@gemini.denx.de> <5265fdd5-3992-4e5f-3235-5586b3b77dd7@prevas.dk> <20200221161414.CD46924005E@gemini.denx.de> Message-ID: <20200221161925.GK18302@bill-the-cat> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 05:14:14PM +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Rasmus, > > In message <5265fdd5-3992-4e5f-3235-5586b3b77dd7@prevas.dk> you wrote: > > > > So without the fat.c patch, CONFIG_SPL_SAVEENV is effectively ignored. > > OK, but what about bords that don't store the envionment in a file > system, but instead for example in (parallel or SPI) NOR flash or in > a UBI volume? I think the intent is that there is no change today but the door is now open for someone that can test / confirm changes there to do so. -- Tom -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 659 bytes Desc: not available URL: