From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.linutronix.de (193.142.43.55:993) by crypto-ml.lab.linutronix.de with IMAP4-SSL for ; 24 Feb 2020 23:10:53 -0000 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1j6MsD-0000mG-Qx for speck@linutronix.de; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 00:10:50 +0100 Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FA26AD26 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 23:10:42 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 00:10:34 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov Subject: [MODERATED] Re: [PATCH 2/2] more sampling fun 2 Message-ID: <20200224231034.GE29636@zn.tnic> References: <20200224173121.GA32673@char.us.oracle.com> <20200224181734.GB29636@zn.tnic> <20200224213929.GA100552@mtg-dev.jf.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200224213929.GA100552@mtg-dev.jf.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: speck@linutronix.de List-ID: On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 01:39:29PM -0800, speck for mark gross wrote: > The implementation uses srbds_mitigation=3D.. (the commit comment now upda= ted to > reflect this) Certainly not with "mitigation" in the name. All those switches control mitigations so there's no need to tautologically have it in the name too. --=20 Regards/Gruss, Boris. SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, GF: Felix Imend=C3=B6rffer, HRB 36809, = AG N=C3=BCrnberg --=20