From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9852DC76570 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 14:37:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62E9D2468F for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 14:37:17 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1582814237; bh=JrqyDo3x/1o+v5c62+1zKO0XnJlzXMNnrtph6kSO1Tc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=MHrwjeKrsIJNJmOA/wCi9SDX9ph8o+ulhLYxzMqnkVReRwfaLgfv/CYA79hdwcMe2 lOntYzGLyEtBoS55OOiOE75CFuO0An24SpoHkqDHiyu12tdP43PwwKArmJCfO9awSl 3NGGAkji11aFkw3htvEd4DEoGEsKWgXBjDB0wN+g= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732933AbgB0OhP (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Feb 2020 09:37:15 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:58830 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1732349AbgB0N5s (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Feb 2020 08:57:48 -0500 Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AB3C92084E; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 13:57:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1582811868; bh=JrqyDo3x/1o+v5c62+1zKO0XnJlzXMNnrtph6kSO1Tc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=DPqF235rwKp8fDNj0fJWeXyJWSBvzhDaS7wkoge+bZdrqMUI4+y2C+byPVLmyOns3 OSgI0YsPsoZZXoL5MtxWnzwk13tJ07pKr2lXVfL+XFXEJrPUV0bVAfSoEDl4MrwV/W rYjSuS+G61ijUo6WBRt02RqrIT9VdwUiWUZvSifY= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Thumshirn , David Sterba , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 4.14 132/237] btrfs: fix possible NULL-pointer dereference in integrity checks Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 14:35:46 +0100 Message-Id: <20200227132306.434413161@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20200227132255.285644406@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20200227132255.285644406@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Johannes Thumshirn [ Upstream commit 3dbd351df42109902fbcebf27104149226a4fcd9 ] A user reports a possible NULL-pointer dereference in btrfsic_process_superblock(). We are assigning state->fs_info to a local fs_info variable and afterwards checking for the presence of state. While we would BUG_ON() a NULL state anyways, we can also just remove the local fs_info copy, as fs_info is only used once as the first argument for btrfs_num_copies(). There we can just pass in state->fs_info as well. Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205003 Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- fs/btrfs/check-integrity.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/check-integrity.c b/fs/btrfs/check-integrity.c index 7d5a9b51f0d7a..4be07cf31d74c 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/check-integrity.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/check-integrity.c @@ -642,7 +642,6 @@ static struct btrfsic_dev_state *btrfsic_dev_state_hashtable_lookup(dev_t dev, static int btrfsic_process_superblock(struct btrfsic_state *state, struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices) { - struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = state->fs_info; struct btrfs_super_block *selected_super; struct list_head *dev_head = &fs_devices->devices; struct btrfs_device *device; @@ -713,7 +712,7 @@ static int btrfsic_process_superblock(struct btrfsic_state *state, break; } - num_copies = btrfs_num_copies(fs_info, next_bytenr, + num_copies = btrfs_num_copies(state->fs_info, next_bytenr, state->metablock_size); if (state->print_mask & BTRFSIC_PRINT_MASK_NUM_COPIES) pr_info("num_copies(log_bytenr=%llu) = %d\n", -- 2.20.1