From: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.de>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
darrick.wong@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] iomap: return partial I/O count on error in iomap_dio_bio_actor
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 14:35:38 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200228203538.s52t64zcurna77cu@fiona> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200228195954.GJ29971@bombadil.infradead.org>
On 11:59 28/02, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 01:44:01PM -0600, Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote:
> > +++ b/fs/iomap/direct-io.c
> > @@ -264,7 +264,7 @@ iomap_dio_bio_actor(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos, loff_t length,
> > size_t n;
> > if (dio->error) {
> > iov_iter_revert(dio->submit.iter, copied);
> > - copied = ret = 0;
> > + ret = 0;
> > goto out;
>
> There's another change here ... look at the out label
>
> out:
> /* Undo iter limitation to current extent */
> iov_iter_reexpand(dio->submit.iter, orig_count - copied);
> if (copied)
> return copied;
> return ret;
>
> so you're also changing by how much the iter is reexpanded. I
> don't know if it's the appropriate amount; I still don't quite get the
> iov_iter complexities.
>
Ah, okay. Now I understand what Christoph was saying.
I suppose it is safe to remove iov_iter_reexpand(). I don't see any
other goto to this label which will have a non-zero copied value.
And we have already performed the iov_iter_revert().
--
Goldwyn
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-28 20:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-20 15:23 [PATCH v2] iomap: return partial I/O count on error in iomap_dio_bio_actor Goldwyn Rodrigues
2020-02-20 17:42 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-02-21 2:06 ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
2020-02-21 4:51 ` Ritesh Harjani
2020-02-21 12:48 ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
2020-02-25 20:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-02-26 2:12 ` Damien Le Moal
2020-02-26 2:55 ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
2020-02-28 19:44 ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
2020-02-28 19:59 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-02-28 20:35 ` Goldwyn Rodrigues [this message]
2020-03-02 13:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-02-21 13:14 ` David Sterba
2020-02-20 15:24 Goldwyn Rodrigues
2020-03-19 15:08 Goldwyn Rodrigues
2020-03-20 14:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-20 14:23 ` Josef Bacik
2020-03-20 14:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-20 15:35 ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200228203538.s52t64zcurna77cu@fiona \
--to=rgoldwyn@suse.de \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=riteshh@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.