From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3165C3F2D3 for ; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 18:04:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8851A214DB for ; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 18:04:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727489AbgB2SEA (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Feb 2020 13:04:00 -0500 Received: from outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu ([18.9.28.11]:45042 "EHLO outgoing.mit.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727209AbgB2SD7 (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Feb 2020 13:03:59 -0500 Received: from callcc.thunk.org (75-104-88-164.mobility.exede.net [75.104.88.164] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as tytso@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 01TI3N6m018652 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 29 Feb 2020 13:03:30 -0500 Received: by callcc.thunk.org (Postfix, from userid 15806) id 2E9B042045B; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 13:03:23 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 29 Feb 2020 13:03:23 -0500 From: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" To: Russell King - ARM Linux admin Cc: Olof Johansson , Jon Nettleton , Andreas Dilger , "mark.rutland@arm.com" , Lorenzo Pieralisi , "arnd@arndb.de" , "m.karthikeyan@mobiveil.co.in" , "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" , "Z.q. Hou" , "l.subrahmanya@mobiveil.co.in" , "will.deacon@arm.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Leo Li , "M.h. Lian" , Xiaowei Bao , "catalin.marinas@arm.com" , "bhelgaas@google.com" , "andrew.murray@arm.com" , "shawnguo@kernel.org" , Mingkai Hu , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Subject: Re: [PATCHv9 00/12] PCI: Recode Mobiveil driver and add PCIe Gen4 driver for NXP Layerscape SoCs Message-ID: <20200229180323.GC7378@mit.edu> References: <20200110153347.GA29372@e121166-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <20200210152257.GD25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> <20200229095550.GX25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> <20200229110456.GY25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> <20200229151907.GA7378@mit.edu> <20200229170328.GD25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200229170328.GD25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 05:03:28PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote: > > There's a test-appliance designed to be run on ARM64 here[1]. > > > > [1] https://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/tytso/kvm-xfstests/xfstests-amd64.tar.xz > > The filename seems to say "amd64" not "arm64" ? Sorry, I cut and pasted the wrong link: s/amd64/arm64/ If there are arm64-specific locking issues, we can probably flush them out if we could figure out some way of running some of the stress tests in xfstests. I don't know a whole lot about arm-64 architectures; would running xfstests on, say, an Amazon AWS arm-based VM be representative of your new architecture? Or are there a lot of sub-architecture differences in the arm-64 world? - Ted From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1D16C3F2CD for ; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 18:04:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABFE4214DB for ; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 18:04:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="eCAgTB4g" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org ABFE4214DB Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=mit.edu Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=I4YDrrrw+Pwx9XqDwZRg5GqYOyKhdhVQsjkSWvFcJCY=; b=eCAgTB4g87ZfwC bXSBV00P65LnCDR5rPtgFALh5q6EKb0hYLB6SFnIl2+fE5bNOgQREO9m4aPkzVzIWaxgBjb1mOHT4 D3BHQfKrEUZOx3G3gJ/zjEj8XkHydG5l2ZncSJhKF32E9SjUtl49e3N3EEJPhc2/IvKoOBMiAMi78 HI01Xv6rOFFmMlSEN7j3fieKG8HZZedaeMaclQeZdjtwJKPZY8TncBccj+IEoMVI783v7prYWbqvy AK0B/apCpH1OZOY1W6imDogkTa1u2S8I5wm1LNPW6UdXSNNxI57c+Q9H9U1kgyoS/wiFnzL4I+OcG n1Be1BELE9dbxCSHdS2Q==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1j86Su-0001xV-Sl; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 18:03:52 +0000 Received: from outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu ([18.9.28.11] helo=outgoing.mit.edu) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1j86Ss-0001we-3s for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 18:03:51 +0000 Received: from callcc.thunk.org (75-104-88-164.mobility.exede.net [75.104.88.164] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as tytso@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 01TI3N6m018652 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 29 Feb 2020 13:03:30 -0500 Received: by callcc.thunk.org (Postfix, from userid 15806) id 2E9B042045B; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 13:03:23 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 29 Feb 2020 13:03:23 -0500 From: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" To: Russell King - ARM Linux admin Subject: Re: [PATCHv9 00/12] PCI: Recode Mobiveil driver and add PCIe Gen4 driver for NXP Layerscape SoCs Message-ID: <20200229180323.GC7378@mit.edu> References: <20200110153347.GA29372@e121166-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <20200210152257.GD25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> <20200229095550.GX25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> <20200229110456.GY25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> <20200229151907.GA7378@mit.edu> <20200229170328.GD25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200229170328.GD25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200229_100350_328014_4241401D X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 8.39 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "mark.rutland@arm.com" , Lorenzo Pieralisi , "m.karthikeyan@mobiveil.co.in" , "arnd@arndb.de" , "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" , "Z.q. Hou" , "l.subrahmanya@mobiveil.co.in" , Jon Nettleton , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "will.deacon@arm.com" , Leo Li , "M.h. Lian" , Andreas Dilger , Xiaowei Bao , "catalin.marinas@arm.com" , Olof Johansson , "andrew.murray@arm.com" , "bhelgaas@google.com" , "shawnguo@kernel.org" , Mingkai Hu , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 05:03:28PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote: > > There's a test-appliance designed to be run on ARM64 here[1]. > > > > [1] https://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/tytso/kvm-xfstests/xfstests-amd64.tar.xz > > The filename seems to say "amd64" not "arm64" ? Sorry, I cut and pasted the wrong link: s/amd64/arm64/ If there are arm64-specific locking issues, we can probably flush them out if we could figure out some way of running some of the stress tests in xfstests. I don't know a whole lot about arm-64 architectures; would running xfstests on, say, an Amazon AWS arm-based VM be representative of your new architecture? Or are there a lot of sub-architecture differences in the arm-64 world? - Ted _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel