From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7FD1C3F2CD for ; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 23:25:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 743342173E for ; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 23:25:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1583191528; bh=+Ch1kAwnRSAhnEYWYeS0IClgwv4aRBiLDZ4SEonb9hM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=uX7CEAOPY4Nf2S6iT+O/VaZjl+CqP1rwijtx2luTT3kc7efv4Z6YGQMCXMrWHVZLl 7iivmbMs0rBl5coTJHPLMXfxtefwNPkU3YYRjA3dcsaqT8ud8xCVdpeRthj62z9ZpH w7ehGYdtZ865GvdFI+7fAZatN3HicN9umnDK/h6E= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726773AbgCBXZ2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Mar 2020 18:25:28 -0500 Received: from mail-ot1-f68.google.com ([209.85.210.68]:35585 "EHLO mail-ot1-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726728AbgCBXZ1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Mar 2020 18:25:27 -0500 Received: by mail-ot1-f68.google.com with SMTP id v10so1170003otp.2; Mon, 02 Mar 2020 15:25:27 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=OkU6h93T1z7BbIKFi2XT/lPbFqlFCSBzUI1f7w5xrXM=; b=YYSmVLSNI2ydfFTwuvIKuccg4Cp3GWgrDVpoe0VQeKabnBybKr54ozLa9LAJnjVeQh yJnClxF0OQuD18q7M8eLOOnz6lrB/ugMe6TwzcUpFeplC+Vu2GfkR1862WdRKc+yEPYT 6jjXiwmucsW0tx5ESG9gaYjs3lUh8jQqIGAFGiCzAz7KVKRXokrQFbwVltkm7TSx+Vu1 Rfo3fhNkQwaIAl3SX/VA3PXmGuN3klpHu8pcly2znV2E66HlkuE0Bxko6GJyaTlT1WwS lziAjq+jgtz+djwScZBPdD3pjyVODOc9Z0Qg8S8eEw9RtWm9xRlicHK0wO+97bpA5nQ/ bxaQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ3KQwWEYAAX5U6b/iShyZDph0F9tFRM4lPCBDp9ZtoLUKrd5EKx EItI+LemkcVFXjTcwH3vbg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vt6nyQwvzyGCVGjnZvcOohd30nERptmkf1F6xc1R7WZ2cUFjUGFfnfoCsjmS0qa+/CP/L7WJQ== X-Received: by 2002:a9d:6c01:: with SMTP id f1mr1198139otq.133.1583191527119; Mon, 02 Mar 2020 15:25:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from rob-hp-laptop (24-155-109-49.dyn.grandenetworks.net. [24.155.109.49]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w2sm1750081otq.10.2020.03.02.15.25.25 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 02 Mar 2020 15:25:26 -0800 (PST) Received: (nullmailer pid 31631 invoked by uid 1000); Mon, 02 Mar 2020 23:25:25 -0000 Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2020 17:25:25 -0600 From: Rob Herring To: michael.srba@seznam.cz Cc: Dmitry Torokhov , Mark Rutland , linux-input@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Michael Srba Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2][PATCH RESEND] dt-bindings: input/touchscreen: add bindings for zinitix Message-ID: <20200302232525.GA30485@bogus> References: <20200302201216.12410-1-michael.srba@seznam.cz> <20200302201216.12410-2-michael.srba@seznam.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200302201216.12410-2-michael.srba@seznam.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: devicetree-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2 Mar 2020 21:12:16 +0100, michael.srba@seznam.cz wrote: > From: Michael Srba > > This patch adds dts bindings for the zinitix bt541 touchscreen. > > Signed-off-by: Michael Srba > --- > changes in v2: none > changes in v3: document zinitix,mode property > > > .../bindings/input/touchscreen/zinitix.txt | 40 +++++++++++++++++++ > .../devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml | 2 + > 2 files changed, 42 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/zinitix.txt > Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However, there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply. If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.