From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB1D0C3F2C6 for ; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 17:53:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBFF020728 for ; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 17:53:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1583258025; bh=+0DCorTTN4tjWO1sG8JADOF2c+tIaEeqv2Mh+42zHBw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=kqK+PsBc4eow9GdlpxiGN1AZOaAkX2FB6xIAyuMqSf3rEirP5Ip2SSTlTiAmgGvtq iOF4DJiEgzNhF+YGZ2mbKrfhjnVLMRb+EgDS6kGI3s7aiPOm5jH9UeSYIBOLlSAZDq 7T1doV0xgpUFITjCuxUu3Hb9TG1K12bOYdcISEfw= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732416AbgCCRxo (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Mar 2020 12:53:44 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:34316 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731683AbgCCRxl (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Mar 2020 12:53:41 -0500 Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 47A2220728; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 17:53:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1583258020; bh=+0DCorTTN4tjWO1sG8JADOF2c+tIaEeqv2Mh+42zHBw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=FaWgWIVO/lbbfsTvRWtCLGC5sAUklpTfj/4vo6JhR4XK469hC1DF5lmgVlX+Tla+N z7HPEUH01JsJW8G7MYG24X9BdrnzsBFS4BCab8zPkHc1EEJ+jLSuzGtvpxx0WhFEH9 pI338gAbkJDJwCAYapT/Ji9YndFJEVzLUTuE+xnc= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Xiubo Li , Jeff Layton , Ilya Dryomov , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 5.4 039/152] ceph: do not execute direct write in parallel if O_APPEND is specified Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2020 18:42:17 +0100 Message-Id: <20200303174306.860687401@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20200303174302.523080016@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20200303174302.523080016@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Xiubo Li [ Upstream commit 8e4473bb50a1796c9c32b244e5dbc5ee24ead937 ] In O_APPEND & O_DIRECT mode, the data from different writers will be possibly overlapping each other since they take the shared lock. For example, both Writer1 and Writer2 are in O_APPEND and O_DIRECT mode: Writer1 Writer2 shared_lock() shared_lock() getattr(CAP_SIZE) getattr(CAP_SIZE) iocb->ki_pos = EOF iocb->ki_pos = EOF write(data1) write(data2) shared_unlock() shared_unlock() The data2 will overlap the data1 from the same file offset, the old EOF. Switch to exclusive lock instead when O_APPEND is specified. Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- fs/ceph/file.c | 17 +++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ceph/file.c b/fs/ceph/file.c index 11929d2bb594c..cd09e63d682b7 100644 --- a/fs/ceph/file.c +++ b/fs/ceph/file.c @@ -1418,6 +1418,7 @@ static ssize_t ceph_write_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from) struct ceph_cap_flush *prealloc_cf; ssize_t count, written = 0; int err, want, got; + bool direct_lock = false; loff_t pos; loff_t limit = max(i_size_read(inode), fsc->max_file_size); @@ -1428,8 +1429,11 @@ static ssize_t ceph_write_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from) if (!prealloc_cf) return -ENOMEM; + if ((iocb->ki_flags & (IOCB_DIRECT | IOCB_APPEND)) == IOCB_DIRECT) + direct_lock = true; + retry_snap: - if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_DIRECT) + if (direct_lock) ceph_start_io_direct(inode); else ceph_start_io_write(inode); @@ -1519,14 +1523,15 @@ static ssize_t ceph_write_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from) /* we might need to revert back to that point */ data = *from; - if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_DIRECT) { + if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_DIRECT) written = ceph_direct_read_write(iocb, &data, snapc, &prealloc_cf); - ceph_end_io_direct(inode); - } else { + else written = ceph_sync_write(iocb, &data, pos, snapc); + if (direct_lock) + ceph_end_io_direct(inode); + else ceph_end_io_write(inode); - } if (written > 0) iov_iter_advance(from, written); ceph_put_snap_context(snapc); @@ -1577,7 +1582,7 @@ static ssize_t ceph_write_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from) goto out_unlocked; out: - if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_DIRECT) + if (direct_lock) ceph_end_io_direct(inode); else ceph_end_io_write(inode); -- 2.20.1