From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Simon Glass Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2020 21:44:34 -0600 Subject: [PATCH v2 10/39] pci: Adjust dm_pci_read_bar32() to return errors correctly In-Reply-To: <20200309034504.149659-1-sjg@chromium.org> References: <20200309034504.149659-1-sjg@chromium.org> Message-ID: <20200308214442.v2.10.I36321d5e30daf051900f01f6289dfc58439871ea@changeid> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de At present if reading a BAR returns 0xffffffff (e.g. the device is not present) then the value is masked and a different value is returned. This makes it harder to detect the problem when debugging. Update the function to avoid masking in this case. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass Reviewed-by: Bin Meng --- Changes in v2: None drivers/pci/pci-uclass.c | 9 ++++++++- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-uclass.c b/drivers/pci/pci-uclass.c index 213381da6b..7f46e901fb 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/pci-uclass.c +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-uclass.c @@ -1213,7 +1213,14 @@ u32 dm_pci_read_bar32(const struct udevice *dev, int barnum) bar = PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_0 + barnum * 4; dm_pci_read_config32(dev, bar, &addr); - if (addr & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_SPACE_IO) + + /* + * If we get an invalid address, return this so that comparisons with + * FDT_ADDR_T_NONE work correctly + */ + if (addr == 0xffffffff) + return addr; + else if (addr & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_SPACE_IO) return addr & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_IO_MASK; else return addr & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_MASK; -- 2.25.1.481.gfbce0eb801-goog