From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C14CC10F25 for ; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 06:26:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E429320848 for ; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 06:26:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726451AbgCIG0b (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Mar 2020 02:26:31 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:55182 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726426AbgCIG0a (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Mar 2020 02:26:30 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098421.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 0296KFHP130245 for ; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 02:26:29 -0400 Received: from e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.100]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2ym8g2rw9r-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 09 Mar 2020 02:26:29 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 06:26:27 -0000 Received: from b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.26.192) by e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.134) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Mon, 9 Mar 2020 06:26:21 -0000 Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.160]) by b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 0296PKl646858612 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 9 Mar 2020 06:25:20 GMT Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16B5DA4054; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 06:26:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 244A7A4062; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 06:26:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost.localdomain.com (unknown [9.199.44.242]) by b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 06:26:13 +0000 (GMT) From: Kajol Jain To: acme@kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com, maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com, ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com, peterz@infradead.org, yao.jin@linux.intel.com, ak@linux.intel.com, jolsa@kernel.org, kan.liang@linux.intel.com, jmario@redhat.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, mingo@kernel.org, paulus@ozlabs.org, namhyung@kernel.org, mpetlan@redhat.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org, mamatha4@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, kjain@linux.ibm.com Subject: [PATCH v4 1/8] powerpc/perf/hv-24x7: Fix inconsistent output values incase multiple hv-24x7 events run Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2020 11:55:45 +0530 X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.21.0 In-Reply-To: <20200309062552.29911-1-kjain@linux.ibm.com> References: <20200309062552.29911-1-kjain@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 20030906-0016-0000-0000-000002EE744F X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 20030906-0017-0000-0000-00003351D213 Message-Id: <20200309062552.29911-2-kjain@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138,18.0.572 definitions=2020-03-09_01:2020-03-06,2020-03-09 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_spam_definite policy=outbound score=100 phishscore=0 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 priorityscore=1501 lowpriorityscore=0 clxscore=1015 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=781 spamscore=0 malwarescore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2001150001 definitions=main-2003090046 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Commit 2b206ee6b0df ("powerpc/perf/hv-24x7: Display change in counter values")' added to print _change_ in the counter value rather then raw value for 24x7 counters. Incase of transactions, the event count is set to 0 at the beginning of the transaction. It also sets the event's prev_count to the raw value at the time of initialization. Because of setting event count to 0, we are seeing some weird behaviour, whenever we run multiple 24x7 events at a time. For example: command#: ./perf stat -e "{hv_24x7/PM_MCS01_128B_RD_DISP_PORT01,chip=0/, hv_24x7/PM_MCS01_128B_RD_DISP_PORT01,chip=1/}" -C 0 -I 1000 sleep 100 1.000121704 120 hv_24x7/PM_MCS01_128B_RD_DISP_PORT01,chip=0/ 1.000121704 5 hv_24x7/PM_MCS01_128B_RD_DISP_PORT01,chip=1/ 2.000357733 8 hv_24x7/PM_MCS01_128B_RD_DISP_PORT01,chip=0/ 2.000357733 10 hv_24x7/PM_MCS01_128B_RD_DISP_PORT01,chip=1/ 3.000495215 18,446,744,073,709,551,616 hv_24x7/PM_MCS01_128B_RD_DISP_PORT01,chip=0/ 3.000495215 18,446,744,073,709,551,616 hv_24x7/PM_MCS01_128B_RD_DISP_PORT01,chip=1/ 4.000641884 56 hv_24x7/PM_MCS01_128B_RD_DISP_PORT01,chip=0/ 4.000641884 18,446,744,073,709,551,616 hv_24x7/PM_MCS01_128B_RD_DISP_PORT01,chip=1/ 5.000791887 18,446,744,073,709,551,616 hv_24x7/PM_MCS01_128B_RD_DISP_PORT01,chip=0/ Getting these large values in case we do -I. As we are setting event_count to 0, for interval case, overall event_count is not coming in incremental order. As we may can get new delta lesser then previous count. Because of which when we print intervals, we are getting negative value which create these large values. This patch removes part where we set event_count to 0 in function 'h_24x7_event_read'. There won't be much impact as we do set event->hw.prev_count to the raw value at the time of initialization to print change value. With this patch In power9 platform command#: ./perf stat -e "{hv_24x7/PM_MCS01_128B_RD_DISP_PORT01,chip=0/, hv_24x7/PM_MCS01_128B_RD_DISP_PORT01,chip=1/}" -C 0 -I 1000 sleep 100 1.000117685 93 hv_24x7/PM_MCS01_128B_RD_DISP_PORT01,chip=0/ 1.000117685 1 hv_24x7/PM_MCS01_128B_RD_DISP_PORT01,chip=1/ 2.000349331 98 hv_24x7/PM_MCS01_128B_RD_DISP_PORT01,chip=0/ 2.000349331 2 hv_24x7/PM_MCS01_128B_RD_DISP_PORT01,chip=1/ 3.000495900 131 hv_24x7/PM_MCS01_128B_RD_DISP_PORT01,chip=0/ 3.000495900 4 hv_24x7/PM_MCS01_128B_RD_DISP_PORT01,chip=1/ 4.000645920 204 hv_24x7/PM_MCS01_128B_RD_DISP_PORT01,chip=0/ 4.000645920 61 hv_24x7/PM_MCS01_128B_RD_DISP_PORT01,chip=1/ 4.284169997 22 hv_24x7/PM_MCS01_128B_RD_DISP_PORT01,chip=0/ Signed-off-by: Kajol Jain Suggested-by: Sukadev Bhattiprolu --- arch/powerpc/perf/hv-24x7.c | 10 ---------- 1 file changed, 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/hv-24x7.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/hv-24x7.c index 573e0b309c0c..48e8f4b17b91 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/hv-24x7.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/hv-24x7.c @@ -1400,16 +1400,6 @@ static void h_24x7_event_read(struct perf_event *event) h24x7hw = &get_cpu_var(hv_24x7_hw); h24x7hw->events[i] = event; put_cpu_var(h24x7hw); - /* - * Clear the event count so we can compute the _change_ - * in the 24x7 raw counter value at the end of the txn. - * - * Note that we could alternatively read the 24x7 value - * now and save its value in event->hw.prev_count. But - * that would require issuing a hcall, which would then - * defeat the purpose of using the txn interface. - */ - local64_set(&event->count, 0); } put_cpu_var(hv_24x7_reqb); -- 2.18.1 From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00471C10F25 for ; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 06:30:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A114020866 for ; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 06:30:00 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A114020866 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48bSxy4Z62zDqpv for ; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 17:29:58 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=kjain@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48bSt04Vp1zDqQX for ; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 17:26:32 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098416.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 0296NCVN099024 for ; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 02:26:29 -0400 Received: from e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.100]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2ym64832fc-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 09 Mar 2020 02:26:29 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 06:26:27 -0000 Received: from b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.26.192) by e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.134) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Mon, 9 Mar 2020 06:26:21 -0000 Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.160]) by b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 0296PKl646858612 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 9 Mar 2020 06:25:20 GMT Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16B5DA4054; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 06:26:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 244A7A4062; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 06:26:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost.localdomain.com (unknown [9.199.44.242]) by b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 06:26:13 +0000 (GMT) From: Kajol Jain To: acme@kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com Subject: [PATCH v4 1/8] powerpc/perf/hv-24x7: Fix inconsistent output values incase multiple hv-24x7 events run Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2020 11:55:45 +0530 X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.21.0 In-Reply-To: <20200309062552.29911-1-kjain@linux.ibm.com> References: <20200309062552.29911-1-kjain@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 20030906-0016-0000-0000-000002EE744F X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 20030906-0017-0000-0000-00003351D213 Message-Id: <20200309062552.29911-2-kjain@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138, 18.0.572 definitions=2020-03-09_01:2020-03-06, 2020-03-09 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_spam_definite policy=outbound score=100 adultscore=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 phishscore=0 malwarescore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=781 lowpriorityscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2001150001 definitions=main-2003090046 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com, peterz@infradead.org, yao.jin@linux.intel.com, mingo@kernel.org, kan.liang@linux.intel.com, ak@linux.intel.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mamatha4@linux.vnet.ibm.com, ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com, kjain@linux.ibm.com, jmario@redhat.com, namhyung@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mpetlan@redhat.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Commit 2b206ee6b0df ("powerpc/perf/hv-24x7: Display change in counter values")' added to print _change_ in the counter value rather then raw value for 24x7 counters. Incase of transactions, the event count is set to 0 at the beginning of the transaction. It also sets the event's prev_count to the raw value at the time of initialization. Because of setting event count to 0, we are seeing some weird behaviour, whenever we run multiple 24x7 events at a time. For example: command#: ./perf stat -e "{hv_24x7/PM_MCS01_128B_RD_DISP_PORT01,chip=0/, hv_24x7/PM_MCS01_128B_RD_DISP_PORT01,chip=1/}" -C 0 -I 1000 sleep 100 1.000121704 120 hv_24x7/PM_MCS01_128B_RD_DISP_PORT01,chip=0/ 1.000121704 5 hv_24x7/PM_MCS01_128B_RD_DISP_PORT01,chip=1/ 2.000357733 8 hv_24x7/PM_MCS01_128B_RD_DISP_PORT01,chip=0/ 2.000357733 10 hv_24x7/PM_MCS01_128B_RD_DISP_PORT01,chip=1/ 3.000495215 18,446,744,073,709,551,616 hv_24x7/PM_MCS01_128B_RD_DISP_PORT01,chip=0/ 3.000495215 18,446,744,073,709,551,616 hv_24x7/PM_MCS01_128B_RD_DISP_PORT01,chip=1/ 4.000641884 56 hv_24x7/PM_MCS01_128B_RD_DISP_PORT01,chip=0/ 4.000641884 18,446,744,073,709,551,616 hv_24x7/PM_MCS01_128B_RD_DISP_PORT01,chip=1/ 5.000791887 18,446,744,073,709,551,616 hv_24x7/PM_MCS01_128B_RD_DISP_PORT01,chip=0/ Getting these large values in case we do -I. As we are setting event_count to 0, for interval case, overall event_count is not coming in incremental order. As we may can get new delta lesser then previous count. Because of which when we print intervals, we are getting negative value which create these large values. This patch removes part where we set event_count to 0 in function 'h_24x7_event_read'. There won't be much impact as we do set event->hw.prev_count to the raw value at the time of initialization to print change value. With this patch In power9 platform command#: ./perf stat -e "{hv_24x7/PM_MCS01_128B_RD_DISP_PORT01,chip=0/, hv_24x7/PM_MCS01_128B_RD_DISP_PORT01,chip=1/}" -C 0 -I 1000 sleep 100 1.000117685 93 hv_24x7/PM_MCS01_128B_RD_DISP_PORT01,chip=0/ 1.000117685 1 hv_24x7/PM_MCS01_128B_RD_DISP_PORT01,chip=1/ 2.000349331 98 hv_24x7/PM_MCS01_128B_RD_DISP_PORT01,chip=0/ 2.000349331 2 hv_24x7/PM_MCS01_128B_RD_DISP_PORT01,chip=1/ 3.000495900 131 hv_24x7/PM_MCS01_128B_RD_DISP_PORT01,chip=0/ 3.000495900 4 hv_24x7/PM_MCS01_128B_RD_DISP_PORT01,chip=1/ 4.000645920 204 hv_24x7/PM_MCS01_128B_RD_DISP_PORT01,chip=0/ 4.000645920 61 hv_24x7/PM_MCS01_128B_RD_DISP_PORT01,chip=1/ 4.284169997 22 hv_24x7/PM_MCS01_128B_RD_DISP_PORT01,chip=0/ Signed-off-by: Kajol Jain Suggested-by: Sukadev Bhattiprolu --- arch/powerpc/perf/hv-24x7.c | 10 ---------- 1 file changed, 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/hv-24x7.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/hv-24x7.c index 573e0b309c0c..48e8f4b17b91 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/hv-24x7.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/hv-24x7.c @@ -1400,16 +1400,6 @@ static void h_24x7_event_read(struct perf_event *event) h24x7hw = &get_cpu_var(hv_24x7_hw); h24x7hw->events[i] = event; put_cpu_var(h24x7hw); - /* - * Clear the event count so we can compute the _change_ - * in the 24x7 raw counter value at the end of the txn. - * - * Note that we could alternatively read the 24x7 value - * now and save its value in event->hw.prev_count. But - * that would require issuing a hcall, which would then - * defeat the purpose of using the txn interface. - */ - local64_set(&event->count, 0); } put_cpu_var(hv_24x7_reqb); -- 2.18.1