From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDCA2C10F27 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 09:20:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B12A4208E4 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 09:20:45 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B12A4208E4 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:55900 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jBb48-0003W9-QR for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 05:20:44 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37568) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jBb2v-0001pv-ED for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 05:19:30 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jBb2t-00065N-Ao for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 05:19:29 -0400 Received: from szxga05-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.191]:3269 helo=huawei.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jBb2p-0005ih-N1; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 05:19:24 -0400 Received: from DGGEMS407-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.59]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 3DD00CAF2E97E0FBE086; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 17:19:19 +0800 (CST) Received: from linux-kDCJWP.huawei.com (10.175.104.212) by DGGEMS407-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.207) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.487.0; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 17:19:09 +0800 From: Keqian Zhu To: Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] memory: Introduce start_global variable in dirty bitmap sync Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 17:17:03 +0800 Message-ID: <20200310091704.42340-2-zhukeqian1@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.19.1 In-Reply-To: <20200310091704.42340-1-zhukeqian1@huawei.com> References: <20200310091704.42340-1-zhukeqian1@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Originating-IP: [10.175.104.212] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 45.249.212.191 X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Paolo Bonzini , qemu-arm@nongnu.org, Keqian Zhu , "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" , wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" In the cpu_physical_memory_sync_dirty_bitmap func, use start_global variable to make code more clear. And the addr variable is only used in slow path, so move it to slow path. Signed-off-by: Keqian Zhu --- include/exec/ram_addr.h | 11 +++++------ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/exec/ram_addr.h b/include/exec/ram_addr.h index 5e59a3d8d7..8311efb7bc 100644 --- a/include/exec/ram_addr.h +++ b/include/exec/ram_addr.h @@ -445,14 +445,13 @@ uint64_t cpu_physical_memory_sync_dirty_bitmap(RAMB= lock *rb, ram_addr_t length, uint64_t *real_dirty_page= s) { - ram_addr_t addr; - unsigned long word =3D BIT_WORD((start + rb->offset) >> TARGET_PAGE_= BITS); + ram_addr_t start_global =3D start + rb->offset; + unsigned long word =3D BIT_WORD(start_global >> TARGET_PAGE_BITS); uint64_t num_dirty =3D 0; unsigned long *dest =3D rb->bmap; =20 /* start address and length is aligned at the start of a word? */ - if (((word * BITS_PER_LONG) << TARGET_PAGE_BITS) =3D=3D - (start + rb->offset) && + if (((word * BITS_PER_LONG) << TARGET_PAGE_BITS) =3D=3D start_global= && !(length & ((BITS_PER_LONG << TARGET_PAGE_BITS) - 1))) { int k; int nr =3D BITS_TO_LONGS(length >> TARGET_PAGE_BITS); @@ -495,11 +494,11 @@ uint64_t cpu_physical_memory_sync_dirty_bitmap(RAMB= lock *rb, memory_region_clear_dirty_bitmap(rb->mr, start, length); } } else { - ram_addr_t offset =3D rb->offset; + ram_addr_t addr; =20 for (addr =3D 0; addr < length; addr +=3D TARGET_PAGE_SIZE) { if (cpu_physical_memory_test_and_clear_dirty( - start + addr + offset, + start_global + addr, TARGET_PAGE_SIZE, DIRTY_MEMORY_MIGRATION)) { *real_dirty_pages +=3D 1; --=20 2.19.1