All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Itsuro Oda <oda@valinux.co.jp>
To: dev@dpdk.org, maxime.coquelin@redhat.com, zhihong.wang@intel.com,
	xiaolong.ye@intel.com, stable@dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] vhost: make iotlb cache name unique among multi processes
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 08:19:18 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200311231918.20701-1-oda@valinux.co.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200310050003.16728-1-oda@valinux.co.jp>

Currently, iotlb cache name is comprised of vid and virtqueue
index. For example, "iotlb_cache_0_0". Because vid is assigned
per process, iotlb cache name is not unique among multi processes.
For example a secondary process uses a vhost
(ex. eth_vhost0,iface=/tmp/sock0) and another secondary process
uses a vhost (ex. eth_vhost1,iface=/tmp/sock1), iotlb cache
name of both vhost ("iotlb_cache_0_0") are same and as a result
iotlb cache is broken.

This patch makes iotlb cache name unique among milti processes
by adding process id to the iotlb cache name.

The prefix of the name is shortend to "iotlb_" since the maximum
length of pool name is 25 bytes (RTE_MEMPOOL_NAMESIZE is 26).
Note that it is just 25 characters in maximum at the moment.
Here,
* pid_t == int: max 10 digits.
* vid < MAX_VHOST_DECICE(1024): max 4 digits.
* vq_index < VHOST_MAX_VRING(256): max 3 digits.

Fixes: d012d1f293f4 (vhost: add IOTLB helper functions)
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Itsuro Oda <oda@valinux.co.jp>
---
v3:
* change format.
* fix commit message.

v2:
* use the process id to make the iotlb cache name unique.

 lib/librte_vhost/iotlb.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/librte_vhost/iotlb.c b/lib/librte_vhost/iotlb.c
index bc1758528..5b3a0c090 100644
--- a/lib/librte_vhost/iotlb.c
+++ b/lib/librte_vhost/iotlb.c
@@ -308,8 +308,9 @@ vhost_user_iotlb_init(struct virtio_net *dev, int vq_index)
 	TAILQ_INIT(&vq->iotlb_list);
 	TAILQ_INIT(&vq->iotlb_pending_list);
 
-	snprintf(pool_name, sizeof(pool_name), "iotlb_cache_%d_%d",
-			dev->vid, vq_index);
+	snprintf(pool_name, sizeof(pool_name), "iotlb_%u_%d_%d",
+			getpid(), dev->vid, vq_index);
+	VHOST_LOG_CONFIG(DEBUG, "IOTLB cache name: %s\n", pool_name);
 
 	/* If already created, free it and recreate */
 	vq->iotlb_pool = rte_mempool_lookup(pool_name);
-- 
2.17.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-03-11 23:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-10  5:00 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] vhost: make iotlb cache name unique among multi processes Itsuro Oda
2020-03-10 11:32 ` Ye Xiaolong
2020-03-10 12:44   ` Van Haaren, Harry
2020-03-10 12:58     ` Maxime Coquelin
2020-03-11  0:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Itsuro Oda
2020-03-11 23:19 ` Itsuro Oda [this message]
2020-04-09 14:25   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Maxime Coquelin
2020-04-10 14:45   ` Maxime Coquelin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200311231918.20701-1-oda@valinux.co.jp \
    --to=oda@valinux.co.jp \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    --cc=xiaolong.ye@intel.com \
    --cc=zhihong.wang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.