From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17774C10DCE for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 16:33:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EACD7205ED for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 16:33:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726940AbgCRQdX (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Mar 2020 12:33:23 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:45514 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726801AbgCRQdW (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Mar 2020 12:33:22 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C84FBAC5F; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 16:33:21 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2020 11:33:18 -0500 From: Goldwyn Rodrigues To: Omar Sandoval Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/15] btrfs: read repair/direct I/O improvements Message-ID: <20200318163318.yoetyqma7kh4l5y7@fiona> References: <20200310163940.GE6361@lst.de> <20200311092251.GG252106@vader> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200311092251.GG252106@vader> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org On 2:22 11/03, Omar Sandoval wrote: > On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 05:39:40PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Adding Goldwyn, > > > > as he has been looking into converting btrfs to the iomap direct > > I/O code. This doesn't look like a major conflict, but he should > > be knowledgeable about the dio code by now after a few iterations > > of that. > > Thanks, I did try to avoid conflicting with the iomap rework, and I'm > looking forward to the further improvement. Sorry for the late response, I have been on vacation last week and recovering from backlog. Most of the code does not seem to conflict with the direct I/O iomap work. I am ready with my patches in my git [1]. However, I would like to base my patches on yours. Do you have them in a public git tree anywhere? preferably with the acks/review comments. [1] https://github.com/goldwynr/linux/tree/btrfs-iomap-dio -- Goldwyn