From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4009C43331 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 16:28:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C28E2080C for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 16:28:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alien8.de header.i=@alien8.de header.b="f6dU36lr" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728851AbgCXQ2v (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Mar 2020 12:28:51 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:55226 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728150AbgCXQ2v (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Mar 2020 12:28:51 -0400 Received: from zn.tnic (p200300EC2F0BC8009042E8B149D34204.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2f0b:c800:9042:e8b1:49d3:4204]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id 1B0561EC0C50; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 17:28:50 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1585067330; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=J0usAIcUQuByh9u13ia7j74xd5hkNgsjvYQH1lBcdMY=; b=f6dU36lr8wTOzCrnIeW3gHymiN7J4DkFoOqDrq6WbjeoHd5o/tuqFRn1yOlLWeyRcj/9u2 V+3RGQfO+7+lV/jip1I9Ckq0J3cNXJNyIwc+AZ2+40kQXOJ8nxj+RwONVL55Vk1vX850vQ zolEWr6NZMuVIh6SoqonPuxGw8xl9eE= Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 17:28:43 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Cc: Masahiro Yamada , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, Kees Cook , Arvind Sankar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , X86 ML , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Thomas Lendacky , Mauro Rossi , Michael Matz Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation/changes: Raise minimum supported binutils version to 2.23 Message-ID: <20200324162843.GE22931@zn.tnic> References: <202001131750.C1B8468@keescook> <20200114165135.GK31032@zn.tnic> <20200115002131.GA3258770@rani.riverdale.lan> <20200115122458.GB20975@zn.tnic> <20200316160259.GN26126@zn.tnic> <20200323204454.GA2611336@zx2c4.com> <202003231350.7D35351@keescook> <20200324091437.GB22931@zn.tnic> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 10:22:53AM -0600, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > Both Kees and I were pretty positive yesterday about getting this done > in 5.7, now. Are you or Kees going to deal with any fallout from upping the binutils version, rushed in in the last week before the merge window? Because I sure as hell am not. *Especially* if there's no big difference when it goes in. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette