[PATCH net-next v2] net: phy: probe PHY drivers synchronously

[PATCH net-next v2] net: phy: probe PHY drivers synchronously

[Heiner Kallweit]

If we have scenarios like

mdiobus_register()
	-> loads PHY driver module(s)
	-> registers PHY driver(s)
	-> may schedule async probe
phydev = mdiobus_get_phy()
<phydev action involving PHY driver>

or

phydev = phy_device_create()
	-> loads PHY driver module
	-> registers PHY driver
	-> may schedule async probe
<phydev action involving PHY driver>

then we expect the PHY driver to be bound to the phydev when triggering
the action. This may not be the case in case of asynchronous probing.
Therefore ensure that PHY drivers are probed synchronously.

Default still is sync probing, except async probing is explicitly
requested. I saw some comments that the intention is to promote
async probing for more parallelism in boot process and want to be
prepared for the case that the default is changed to async probing.

Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c b/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
index d6024b678..ac2784192 100644
--- a/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
+++ b/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
@@ -2575,6 +2575,7 @@ int phy_driver_register(struct phy_driver *new_driver, struct module *owner)
 	new_driver->mdiodrv.driver.probe = phy_probe;
 	new_driver->mdiodrv.driver.remove = phy_remove;
 	new_driver->mdiodrv.driver.owner = owner;
+	new_driver->mdiodrv.driver.probe_type = PROBE_FORCE_SYNCHRONOUS;
 
 	retval = driver_register(&new_driver->mdiodrv.driver);
 	if (retval) {
-- 
2.26.0

Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: phy: probe PHY drivers synchronously

[Florian Fainelli]

On 3/26/2020 5:00 PM, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> If we have scenarios like
> 
> mdiobus_register()
> 	-> loads PHY driver module(s)
> 	-> registers PHY driver(s)
> 	-> may schedule async probe
> phydev = mdiobus_get_phy()
> <phydev action involving PHY driver>
> 
> or
> 
> phydev = phy_device_create()
> 	-> loads PHY driver module
> 	-> registers PHY driver
> 	-> may schedule async probe
> <phydev action involving PHY driver>
> 
> then we expect the PHY driver to be bound to the phydev when triggering
> the action. This may not be the case in case of asynchronous probing.
> Therefore ensure that PHY drivers are probed synchronously.
> 
> Default still is sync probing, except async probing is explicitly
> requested. I saw some comments that the intention is to promote
> async probing for more parallelism in boot process and want to be
> prepared for the case that the default is changed to async probing.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>

Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
-- 
Florian

Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: phy: probe PHY drivers synchronously

[Andrew Lunn]

On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 01:00:22AM +0100, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> If we have scenarios like
> 
> mdiobus_register()
> 	-> loads PHY driver module(s)
> 	-> registers PHY driver(s)
> 	-> may schedule async probe
> phydev = mdiobus_get_phy()
> <phydev action involving PHY driver>
> 
> or
> 
> phydev = phy_device_create()
> 	-> loads PHY driver module
> 	-> registers PHY driver
> 	-> may schedule async probe
> <phydev action involving PHY driver>
> 
> then we expect the PHY driver to be bound to the phydev when triggering
> the action. This may not be the case in case of asynchronous probing.
> Therefore ensure that PHY drivers are probed synchronously.
> 
> Default still is sync probing, except async probing is explicitly
> requested. I saw some comments that the intention is to promote
> async probing for more parallelism in boot process and want to be
> prepared for the case that the default is changed to async probing.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>

Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>

    Andrew

Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: phy: probe PHY drivers synchronously

[David Miller]

From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 01:00:22 +0100

> If we have scenarios like
> 
> mdiobus_register()
> 	-> loads PHY driver module(s)
> 	-> registers PHY driver(s)
> 	-> may schedule async probe
> phydev = mdiobus_get_phy()
> <phydev action involving PHY driver>
> 
> or
> 
> phydev = phy_device_create()
> 	-> loads PHY driver module
> 	-> registers PHY driver
> 	-> may schedule async probe
> <phydev action involving PHY driver>
> 
> then we expect the PHY driver to be bound to the phydev when triggering
> the action. This may not be the case in case of asynchronous probing.
> Therefore ensure that PHY drivers are probed synchronously.
> 
> Default still is sync probing, except async probing is explicitly
> requested. I saw some comments that the intention is to promote
> async probing for more parallelism in boot process and want to be
> prepared for the case that the default is changed to async probing.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>

Applied, thanks Heiner.