All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: jani.nikula@intel.com
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v20 05/10] drm/i915: Extract gen specific functions from intel_can_enable_sagv
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2020 20:10:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200326181005.11775-6-stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200326181005.11775-1-stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>

Addressing one of the comments, recommending to extract platform
specific code from intel_can_enable_sagv as a preparation, before
we are going to add support for tgl+.

Current code in intel_can_enable_sagv is valid only for skl,
so this patch adds also proper support for icl, subsequent
patches will add support for tgl+, combined with other required
changes.

Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 89 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index f8d62d1977ac..64193b098175 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -3757,41 +3757,24 @@ intel_disable_sagv(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-bool intel_can_enable_sagv(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
+static bool icl_can_enable_sagv_on_pipe(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
 {
-	struct drm_device *dev = state->base.dev;
+	struct drm_device *dev = crtc_state->uapi.crtc->dev;
 	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
 	struct intel_crtc *crtc;
 	struct intel_plane *plane;
-	struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state;
-	enum pipe pipe;
+	struct intel_plane_state *plane_state;
 	int level, latency;
 
-	if (!intel_has_sagv(dev_priv))
-		return false;
+	crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->uapi.crtc);
 
-	/*
-	 * If there are no active CRTCs, no additional checks need be performed
-	 */
-	if (hweight8(state->active_pipes) == 0)
-		return true;
-
-	/*
-	 * SKL+ workaround: bspec recommends we disable SAGV when we have
-	 * more then one pipe enabled
-	 */
-	if (hweight8(state->active_pipes) > 1)
-		return false;
-
-	/* Since we're now guaranteed to only have one active CRTC... */
-	pipe = ffs(state->active_pipes) - 1;
-	crtc = intel_get_crtc_for_pipe(dev_priv, pipe);
-	crtc_state = to_intel_crtc_state(crtc->base.state);
-
-	if (crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode.flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_INTERLACE)
+	if (crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode.flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_INTERLACE) {
+		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("No SAGV for interlaced mode on pipe %c\n",
+			      pipe_name(crtc->pipe));
 		return false;
+	}
 
-	for_each_intel_plane_on_crtc(dev, crtc, plane) {
+	intel_atomic_crtc_state_for_each_plane_state(plane, plane_state, crtc_state) {
 		struct skl_plane_wm *wm =
 			&crtc_state->wm.skl.optimal.planes[plane->id];
 
@@ -3807,7 +3790,7 @@ bool intel_can_enable_sagv(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
 		latency = dev_priv->wm.skl_latency[level];
 
 		if (skl_needs_memory_bw_wa(dev_priv) &&
-		    plane->base.state->fb->modifier ==
+		    plane_state->uapi.fb->modifier ==
 		    I915_FORMAT_MOD_X_TILED)
 			latency += 15;
 
@@ -3816,8 +3799,58 @@ bool intel_can_enable_sagv(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
 		 * incur memory latencies higher than sagv_block_time_us we
 		 * can't enable SAGV.
 		 */
-		if (latency < dev_priv->sagv_block_time_us)
+		if (latency < dev_priv->sagv_block_time_us) {
+			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Latency %d < sagv block time %d, no SAGV for pipe %c\n",
+				      latency, dev_priv->sagv_block_time_us, pipe_name(crtc->pipe));
 			return false;
+		}
+	}
+
+	return true;
+}
+
+static bool skl_can_enable_sagv_on_pipe(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
+{
+	struct intel_atomic_state *state = to_intel_atomic_state(crtc_state->uapi.state);
+
+	/*
+	 * It has been recommended that for Gen 9 we switch SAGV off when
+	 * multiple pipes are used.
+	 */
+	if (hweight8(state->active_pipes) > 1)
+		return false;
+
+	/*
+	 * Besides active pipe limitation, rest of checks pretty much match ICL
+	 * so no need to duplicate code
+	 */
+	return icl_can_enable_sagv_on_pipe(crtc_state);
+}
+
+bool intel_can_enable_sagv(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
+{
+	struct drm_device *dev = state->base.dev;
+	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
+	struct intel_crtc *crtc;
+	struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state;
+	int i;
+
+	if (!intel_has_sagv(dev_priv))
+		return false;
+
+	/*
+	 * If there are no active CRTCs, no additional checks need be performed
+	 */
+	if (hweight8(state->active_pipes) == 0)
+		return true;
+
+	for_each_new_intel_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, crtc_state, i) {
+		if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) <= 9) {
+			if (!skl_can_enable_sagv_on_pipe(crtc_state))
+				return false;
+		} else if (!icl_can_enable_sagv_on_pipe(crtc_state)) {
+			return false;
+		}
 	}
 
 	return true;
-- 
2.24.1.485.gad05a3d8e5

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-03-26 18:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-26 18:09 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v20 00/10] SAGV support for Gen12+ Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-03-26 18:09 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v20 01/10] drm/i915: Start passing latency as parameter Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-03-26 18:09 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v20 02/10] drm/i915: Eliminate magic numbers "0" and "1" from color plane Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-04-02 16:17   ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-04-02 16:28     ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-04-02 16:41       ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-04-03 15:41   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v21 " Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-03-26 18:09 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v20 03/10] drm/i915: Introduce skl_plane_wm_level accessor Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-03-26 18:09 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v20 04/10] drm/i915: Add intel_atomic_get_bw_*_state helpers Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-04-02 16:20   ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-04-02 16:49     ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-04-03  6:11   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v21 " Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-04-03  6:15   ` Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-03-26 18:10 ` Stanislav Lisovskiy [this message]
2020-04-02 16:44   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v20 05/10] drm/i915: Extract gen specific functions from intel_can_enable_sagv Ville Syrjälä
2020-04-03  6:20   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v21 " Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-04-07 19:01     ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-04-08  7:58       ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-04-08 14:55         ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-04-08 15:54           ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-04-08 16:18             ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-04-09 15:58               ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-03-26 18:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v20 06/10] drm/i915: Add proper SAGV support for TGL+ Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-03-26 18:39   ` Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-04-02 17:22     ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-04-03  6:29     ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v21 " Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-04-03 15:43       ` Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-03-26 18:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v20 07/10] drm/i915: Added required new PCode commands Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-04-02 17:27   ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-04-03  6:32   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v21 " Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-03-26 18:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v20 08/10] drm/i915: Rename bw_state to new_bw_state Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-04-02 17:30   ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-04-03  6:34   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v21 " Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-03-26 18:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v20 09/10] drm/i915: Restrict qgv points which don't have enough bandwidth Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-03-26 18:36   ` Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-04-02 17:50     ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-04-03  6:37     ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v21 " Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-04-03 16:41       ` Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-03-26 18:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v20 10/10] drm/i915: Enable SAGV support for Gen12 Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-03-26 20:59 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for SAGV support for Gen12+ (rev3) Patchwork
2020-03-26 21:26 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-03-27 11:58 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2020-04-03  6:19 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for SAGV support for Gen12+ (rev4) Patchwork
2020-04-03  6:22 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for SAGV support for Gen12+ (rev5) Patchwork
2020-04-03  6:50 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for SAGV support for Gen12+ (rev10) Patchwork
2020-04-03  6:54 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2020-04-03  7:16 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-04-03 16:29 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for SAGV support for Gen12+ (rev12) Patchwork
2020-04-03 16:40 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for SAGV support for Gen12+ (rev10) Patchwork
2020-04-03 17:05 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for SAGV support for Gen12+ (rev13) Patchwork
2020-04-03 17:29 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-04-04  2:33 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200326181005.11775-6-stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com \
    --to=stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.