From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D4B3C2D0E7 for ; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 07:51:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBAF220705 for ; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 07:51:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726217AbgC0HvK (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Mar 2020 03:51:10 -0400 Received: from a.mx.secunet.com ([62.96.220.36]:53826 "EHLO a.mx.secunet.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725946AbgC0HvJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Mar 2020 03:51:09 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a.mx.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E9152052E; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 08:51:08 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: by secunet Received: from a.mx.secunet.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (a.mx.secunet.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eS3T-P7v1Z3G; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 08:51:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from cas-essen-02.secunet.de (202.40.53.10.in-addr.arpa [10.53.40.202]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a.mx.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A40B20519; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 08:51:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from gauss2.secunet.de (10.182.7.193) by cas-essen-02.secunet.de (10.53.40.202) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1979.3; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 08:51:07 +0100 Received: by gauss2.secunet.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B039D31801D2; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 08:51:07 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 08:51:07 +0100 From: Steffen Klassert To: Xin Long CC: , Herbert Xu , "David S. Miller" , Florian Westphal , Sabrina Dubroca Subject: Re: [PATCH ipsec-next 0/3] xfrm: add offload support for esp beet mode Message-ID: <20200327075107.GZ13121@gauss3.secunet.de> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-ClientProxiedBy: cas-essen-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.201) To cas-essen-02.secunet.de (10.53.40.202) X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: 2c86f778-e09b-4440-8b15-867914633a10 Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 05:02:28PM +0800, Xin Long wrote: > This patchset is to add gso_segment functions for esp4 and esp6 > beet mode, and prep function for both, and tested with 6 cases: > > 1. IPv4 INNER ADDRESSES > - OUTER v4 ADDRESSES > - OUTER v6 ADDRESSES > > 2. IPv4 INNER ADDRESSES with options > - OUTER v4 ADDRESSES > - OUTER v6 ADDRESSES > > 3. IPv6 INNER ADDRESSES > - OUTER v4 ADDRESSES > - OUTER v6 ADDRESSES > > With this patchset, an esp beet mode skb would be segmented and > encryped until it arrives in dev_queue_xmit()/validate_xmit_skb(). > > Xin Long (3): > esp4: add gso_segment for esp4 beet mode > esp6: add gso_segment for esp6 beet mode > xfrm: add prep for esp beet mode offload Series applied to ipsec-next, thanks a lot Xin!