From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 133A3C43331 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 08:38:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alsa0.perex.cz (alsa0.perex.cz [77.48.224.243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89C4F2073B for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 08:38:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alsa-project.org header.i=@alsa-project.org header.b="ag8xuCnM" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 89C4F2073B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (alsa1.perex.cz [207.180.221.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E353D1660; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 10:37:17 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa0.perex.cz E353D1660 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=alsa-project.org; s=default; t=1585730288; bh=oNkcy6MCIxLMMKXHzyyc2MBvLh1ZBTsMYqXgnMQF8B4=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Cc:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From; b=ag8xuCnMT0L3FT7FspU+GMxob1gWrrSQxT+xjMn/tk1Oc5sotyoDxPA/8xxY/Sd6i YbabxEUhLyon9Ehg/Phpt9NjGyhS2fbqepZVoETAfCuTmaSRH/hGTLTzRSd/i2iq5L 2iHTDsSemkNnl8dqUAcQwzI2D5IY43/Bh7oajRbo= Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 734AAF8014A; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 10:37:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix, from userid 50401) id 4DA15F8014B; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 10:37:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32FC2F80110 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 10:37:12 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa1.perex.cz 32FC2F80110 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6756C31B; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 01:37:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (unknown [10.37.6.21]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DF7CA3F52E; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 01:37:09 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2020 09:37:08 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: =?utf-8?B?77+9zLDvv73vv73vv70=?= Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ASoC: topology: use name_prefix for new kcontrol Message-ID: <20200401083708.GA4943@sirena.org.uk> References: <004c01d607be$68cd8b50$3a68a1f0$@samsung.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <004c01d607be$68cd8b50$3a68a1f0$@samsung.com> X-Cookie: The Ranger isn't gonna like it, Yogi. User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, lgirdwood@gmail.com, tiwai@suse.com, hmseo@samsung.com, tkjung@samsung.com, pilsun.jang@samsung.com X-BeenThere: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Alsa-devel mailing list for ALSA developers - http://www.alsa-project.org" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: "Alsa-devel" --OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 09:42:23AM +0900, =EF=BF=BD=CC=B0=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BD= =EF=BF=BD wrote: > Current topology doesn't add prefix of component to new kcontrol. Please only number patches if you are sending them as part of a patch series, the purpose of numbering is to make sure that things get handled in the right order. Without a series it looks like there are some missing patches. --OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAl6EUrAACgkQJNaLcl1U h9A44gf/YID6zxs73bxg9qqZA+lDbazM6OoPj+aQIQAQDpJb61z4CCa8gmzHhzkp iEUUvkGYTBq9+DjRrAK2CGyWuv3oyeoRe1l3wlwP9KpkbpkTXORXfyI0ZZQK7/K8 UgOw58rHO+/UeAlCtkXO6rVAUgGFJB45Uhy5w3wsPR5sOnn8s/ubiwbmgBCOwJVD Q+kk4Ga8vKp3HRvBM0Hwmg1hadAnhzwxmYaXU8mkW2F3Mmb9TfDFP052W8NgKKb+ rhGqT/DbzN7+VBdzwpVJFrDTP+fIELWBkKiKjVwhUbpG2ma5mqKsrXF4tAPE4zVz soK0VmDTQ6/x7HDj2UnaAKQJjfjnDQ== =xwrp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY--