From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: [patch 150/155] hugetlb_cgroup: add hugetlb_cgroup reservation docs Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2020 21:11:41 -0700 Message-ID: <20200402041141.QJ6VXpeTl%akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <20200401210155.09e3b9742e1c6e732f5a7250@linux-foundation.org> Reply-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:38610 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726136AbgDBELn (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Apr 2020 00:11:43 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20200401210155.09e3b9742e1c6e732f5a7250@linux-foundation.org> Sender: mm-commits-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, almasrymina@google.com, gthelen@google.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, mike.kravetz@oracle.com, mm-commits@vger.kernel.org, rientjes@google.com, sandipan@linux.ibm.com, shakeelb@google.com, shuah@kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org From: Mina Almasry Subject: hugetlb_cgroup: add hugetlb_cgroup reservation docs Add docs for how to use hugetlb_cgroup reservations, and their behavior. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200211213128.73302-9-almasrymina@google.com Signed-off-by: Mina Almasry Cc: David Rientjes Cc: Greg Thelen Cc: Mike Kravetz Cc: Sandipan Das Cc: Shakeel Butt Cc: Shuah Khan Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton --- Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v1/hugetlb.rst | 103 ++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 92 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v1/hugetlb.rst~hugetlb_cgroup-add-hugetlb_cgroup-reservation-docs +++ a/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v1/hugetlb.rst @@ -2,13 +2,6 @@ HugeTLB Controller ================== -The HugeTLB controller allows to limit the HugeTLB usage per control group and -enforces the controller limit during page fault. Since HugeTLB doesn't -support page reclaim, enforcing the limit at page fault time implies that, -the application will get SIGBUS signal if it tries to access HugeTLB pages -beyond its limit. This requires the application to know beforehand how much -HugeTLB pages it would require for its use. - HugeTLB controller can be created by first mounting the cgroup filesystem. # mount -t cgroup -o hugetlb none /sys/fs/cgroup @@ -28,10 +21,14 @@ process (bash) into it. Brief summary of control files:: - hugetlb..limit_in_bytes # set/show limit of "hugepagesize" hugetlb usage - hugetlb..max_usage_in_bytes # show max "hugepagesize" hugetlb usage recorded - hugetlb..usage_in_bytes # show current usage for "hugepagesize" hugetlb - hugetlb..failcnt # show the number of allocation failure due to HugeTLB limit + hugetlb..rsvd.limit_in_bytes # set/show limit of "hugepagesize" hugetlb reservations + hugetlb..rsvd.max_usage_in_bytes # show max "hugepagesize" hugetlb reservations and no-reserve faults + hugetlb..rsvd.usage_in_bytes # show current reservations and no-reserve faults for "hugepagesize" hugetlb + hugetlb..rsvd.failcnt # show the number of allocation failure due to HugeTLB reservation limit + hugetlb..limit_in_bytes # set/show limit of "hugepagesize" hugetlb faults + hugetlb..max_usage_in_bytes # show max "hugepagesize" hugetlb usage recorded + hugetlb..usage_in_bytes # show current usage for "hugepagesize" hugetlb + hugetlb..failcnt # show the number of allocation failure due to HugeTLB usage limit For a system supporting three hugepage sizes (64k, 32M and 1G), the control files include:: @@ -40,11 +37,95 @@ files include:: hugetlb.1GB.max_usage_in_bytes hugetlb.1GB.usage_in_bytes hugetlb.1GB.failcnt + hugetlb.1GB.rsvd.limit_in_bytes + hugetlb.1GB.rsvd.max_usage_in_bytes + hugetlb.1GB.rsvd.usage_in_bytes + hugetlb.1GB.rsvd.failcnt hugetlb.64KB.limit_in_bytes hugetlb.64KB.max_usage_in_bytes hugetlb.64KB.usage_in_bytes hugetlb.64KB.failcnt + hugetlb.64KB.rsvd.limit_in_bytes + hugetlb.64KB.rsvd.max_usage_in_bytes + hugetlb.64KB.rsvd.usage_in_bytes + hugetlb.64KB.rsvd.failcnt hugetlb.32MB.limit_in_bytes hugetlb.32MB.max_usage_in_bytes hugetlb.32MB.usage_in_bytes hugetlb.32MB.failcnt + hugetlb.32MB.rsvd.limit_in_bytes + hugetlb.32MB.rsvd.max_usage_in_bytes + hugetlb.32MB.rsvd.usage_in_bytes + hugetlb.32MB.rsvd.failcnt + + +1. Page fault accounting + +hugetlb..limit_in_bytes +hugetlb..max_usage_in_bytes +hugetlb..usage_in_bytes +hugetlb..failcnt + +The HugeTLB controller allows users to limit the HugeTLB usage (page fault) per +control group and enforces the limit during page fault. Since HugeTLB +doesn't support page reclaim, enforcing the limit at page fault time implies +that, the application will get SIGBUS signal if it tries to fault in HugeTLB +pages beyond its limit. Therefore the application needs to know exactly how many +HugeTLB pages it uses before hand, and the sysadmin needs to make sure that +there are enough available on the machine for all the users to avoid processes +getting SIGBUS. + + +2. Reservation accounting + +hugetlb..rsvd.limit_in_bytes +hugetlb..rsvd.max_usage_in_bytes +hugetlb..rsvd.usage_in_bytes +hugetlb..rsvd.failcnt + +The HugeTLB controller allows to limit the HugeTLB reservations per control +group and enforces the controller limit at reservation time and at the fault of +HugeTLB memory for which no reservation exists. Since reservation limits are +enforced at reservation time (on mmap or shget), reservation limits never causes +the application to get SIGBUS signal if the memory was reserved before hand. For +MAP_NORESERVE allocations, the reservation limit behaves the same as the fault +limit, enforcing memory usage at fault time and causing the application to +receive a SIGBUS if it's crossing its limit. + +Reservation limits are superior to page fault limits described above, since +reservation limits are enforced at reservation time (on mmap or shget), and +never causes the application to get SIGBUS signal if the memory was reserved +before hand. This allows for easier fallback to alternatives such as +non-HugeTLB memory for example. In the case of page fault accounting, it's very +hard to avoid processes getting SIGBUS since the sysadmin needs precisely know +the HugeTLB usage of all the tasks in the system and make sure there is enough +pages to satisfy all requests. Avoiding tasks getting SIGBUS on overcommited +systems is practically impossible with page fault accounting. + + +3. Caveats with shared memory + +For shared HugeTLB memory, both HugeTLB reservation and page faults are charged +to the first task that causes the memory to be reserved or faulted, and all +subsequent uses of this reserved or faulted memory is done without charging. + +Shared HugeTLB memory is only uncharged when it is unreserved or deallocated. +This is usually when the HugeTLB file is deleted, and not when the task that +caused the reservation or fault has exited. + + +4. Caveats with HugeTLB cgroup offline. + +When a HugeTLB cgroup goes offline with some reservations or faults still +charged to it, the behavior is as follows: + +- The fault charges are charged to the parent HugeTLB cgroup (reparented), +- the reservation charges remain on the offline HugeTLB cgroup. + +This means that if a HugeTLB cgroup gets offlined while there is still HugeTLB +reservations charged to it, that cgroup persists as a zombie until all HugeTLB +reservations are uncharged. HugeTLB reservations behave in this manner to match +the memory controller whose cgroups also persist as zombie until all charged +memory is uncharged. Also, the tracking of HugeTLB reservations is a bit more +complex compared to the tracking of HugeTLB faults, so it is significantly +harder to reparent reservations at offline time. _