From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2893C2BABC for ; Tue, 7 Apr 2020 06:17:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B58DC206F5 for ; Tue, 7 Apr 2020 06:17:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726877AbgDGGQ7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Apr 2020 02:16:59 -0400 Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([85.220.165.71]:47997 "EHLO metis.ext.pengutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726707AbgDGGQ7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Apr 2020 02:16:59 -0400 Received: from pty.hi.pengutronix.de ([2001:67c:670:100:1d::c5]) by metis.ext.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jLhXT-0007JL-Hs; Tue, 07 Apr 2020 08:16:47 +0200 Received: from ukl by pty.hi.pengutronix.de with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1jLhXS-0008D1-Jd; Tue, 07 Apr 2020 08:16:46 +0200 Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2020 08:16:46 +0200 From: Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= To: Oleksandr Suvorov Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Paul Barker , Marcel Ziswiler , Igor Opaniuk , Philippe Schenker , Laurent Pinchart , Rob Herring , Thierry Reding , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/6] dt-bindings: pwm: document the PWM no-flag Message-ID: <20200407061646.pcglaw43kfmrag6a@pengutronix.de> References: <20200405192246.3741784-1-oleksandr.suvorov@toradex.com> <20200405192246.3741784-3-oleksandr.suvorov@toradex.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20200405192246.3741784-3-oleksandr.suvorov@toradex.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:67c:670:100:1d::c5 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ukl@pengutronix.de X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on metis.ext.pengutronix.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PTX-Original-Recipient: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Apr 05, 2020 at 10:22:42PM +0300, Oleksandr Suvorov wrote: > Add the description of PWM_NOFLAGS flag property. > > Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Suvorov As I already wrote in reply to the v1 series I'd prefer a name for 0 that explicitly handles normal polarity. Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ | From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/6] dt-bindings: pwm: document the PWM no-flag Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2020 08:16:46 +0200 Message-ID: <20200407061646.pcglaw43kfmrag6a@pengutronix.de> References: <20200405192246.3741784-1-oleksandr.suvorov@toradex.com> <20200405192246.3741784-3-oleksandr.suvorov@toradex.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200405192246.3741784-3-oleksandr.suvorov-2KBjVHiyJgBBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Oleksandr Suvorov Cc: devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Paul Barker , Marcel Ziswiler , Igor Opaniuk , Philippe Schenker , Laurent Pinchart , Rob Herring , Thierry Reding , linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-pwm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Apr 05, 2020 at 10:22:42PM +0300, Oleksandr Suvorov wrote: > Add the description of PWM_NOFLAGS flag property. > > Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Suvorov As I already wrote in reply to the v1 series I'd prefer a name for 0 that explicitly handles normal polarity. Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |