All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul Barker" <pbarker@konsulko.com>
To: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo@ribalda.com>
Cc: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>,
	openembedded-core <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] wic: Fix permissions when using exclude or include path
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2020 20:02:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200407200236.748931eb@ub1910> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPybu_3LK7Qj9qSYW8oR=21u5zDz2UbdSe6oV8s6hHQ_COXVxA@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, 7 Apr 2020 20:40:18 +0200
Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo@ribalda.com> wrote:

> Hi Paul
> 
> Thanks for your review, It has been already merged, but if there is
> something wrong we can send a patch fixing it.
> 
> https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/?id=36993eea89d1c011397b7692b9b8d61b499d0171
> 
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 8:13 PM Paul Barker <pbarker@konsulko.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 3 Apr 2020 21:53:39 +0200
> > Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo@ribalda.com> wrote:
> >  
> > > ping?  
> >
> > I think that '../pseudo' should not be used here. I'll explain inline...
> >  
> > > >
> > > > This results in a rootfs owned by the user that is running the wic
> > > > command (usually UID 1000), which makes some rootfs unbootable.
> > > >
> > > > To fix this we copy the content of the pseudo folders to the new folder
> > > > and modify the pseudo database using the "pseudo -B" command.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo@ribalda.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  scripts/lib/wic/plugins/source/rootfs.py | 22 +++++++++++++++++++---
> > > >  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/scripts/lib/wic/plugins/source/rootfs.py b/scripts/lib/wic/plugins/source/rootfs.py
> > > > index 705aeb5563..40419a64b3 100644
> > > > --- a/scripts/lib/wic/plugins/source/rootfs.py
> > > > +++ b/scripts/lib/wic/plugins/source/rootfs.py
> > > > @@ -16,11 +16,11 @@ import os
> > > >  import shutil
> > > >  import sys
> > > >
> > > > -from oe.path import copyhardlinktree
> > > > +from oe.path import copyhardlinktree, copytree
> > > >
> > > >  from wic import WicError
> > > >  from wic.pluginbase import SourcePlugin
> > > > -from wic.misc import get_bitbake_var
> > > > +from wic.misc import get_bitbake_var, exec_native_cmd
> > > >
> > > >  logger = logging.getLogger('wic')
> > > >
> > > > @@ -44,6 +44,15 @@ class RootfsPlugin(SourcePlugin):
> > > >
> > > >          return os.path.realpath(image_rootfs_dir)
> > > >
> > > > +    @staticmethod
> > > > +    def __get_pseudo(native_sysroot, rootfs):
> > > > +        pseudo = "export PSEUDO_PREFIX=%s/usr;" % native_sysroot
> > > > +        pseudo += "export PSEUDO_LOCALSTATEDIR=%s;" % os.path.join(rootfs, "../pseudo")
> > > > +        pseudo += "export PSEUDO_PASSWD=%s;" % rootfs
> > > > +        pseudo += "export PSEUDO_NOSYMLINKEXP=1;"
> > > > +        pseudo += "%s " % get_bitbake_var("FAKEROOTCMD")
> > > > +        return pseudo
> > > > +
> > > >      @classmethod
> > > >      def do_prepare_partition(cls, part, source_params, cr, cr_workdir,
> > > >                               oe_builddir, bootimg_dir, kernel_dir,
> > > > @@ -78,9 +87,16 @@ class RootfsPlugin(SourcePlugin):
> > > >
> > > >              if os.path.lexists(new_rootfs):
> > > >                  shutil.rmtree(os.path.join(new_rootfs))
> > > > -
> > > >              copyhardlinktree(part.rootfs_dir, new_rootfs)
> > > >
> > > > +            if os.path.lexists(os.path.join(new_rootfs, "../pseudo")):  
> >
> > new_rootfs is set by the following statement a few lines above:
> >
> >     new_rootfs = os.path.realpath(os.path.join(cr_workdir, "rootfs%d" % part.lineno))
> >
> > Consider that `cr_workdir` may contain multiple rootfs staging directories
> > corresponding to multiple lines in the wks file, for example if a rootfs
> > image is duplicated into multiple partitions for redundancy. In that case
> > `os.path.join(new_rootfs, "../pseudo")` will clash between these different
> > rootfs copies.
> >
> > Let's use an explicit path instead, such as:
> >
> >     new_pseudo = os.path.realpath(os.path.join(cr_workdir, "pseudo%d" % part.lineno))  
> 
> The reason to have that path was to follow the same structure as the
> real image.bb.
> 
> If there are multiple partitions on the .wic file the different
> partitions are done one by one, not
> in parallel.
> 
> So
> ../pseudo will be created  for partition1
> then it will be used to generate the partition1
> 
> ../pseudo will be deleted
> ../pseudo will be created  for partition2
> 
> Even if they use the same partition, the code works (and ../pseudo is
> useless once the partition is generated)
> 

Having these separate is important for debugging though, it lets you look
through the different copies after wic exits if something is wrong.

> >  
> > > > +                shutil.rmtree(os.path.join(new_rootfs, "../pseudo"))
> > > > +            copytree(os.path.join(part.rootfs_dir, "../pseudo"),  
> >
> > part.rootfs_dir is whatever is given as the option to `--rootfs-dir`. There
> > is no guarantee that `../psuedo` is valid or if it corresponds to the rootfs
> > directory given. It's unsafe to step up the directory tree and make
> > assumptions like this.  
> 
> I think that if we do not pass a real rootfs to the rootfs plugin it
> is an error from the user.
> 
> We can add a more beautiful error message instead of a backtrace.
> 
> Or if you believe that it is a valid usecase to not pass a rootfs then
> we can continue with a warning/debug message and explicitly telling
> the user that the permissions are going to be invalid, because what he
> is using as a roofs is an unknow directory for bitbake.

This is a valid and existing usecase. This is how data partitions are
populated and how you separate /home or another directory into its own
partiton (e.g.
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/56187209/yocto-create-and-populate-a-separate-home-partition).

> 
> I have no personal preference for any of the two, tell me what do you
> prefer (or a different option) and I will implement it.
> 
> Thans again for the review.
> 

This patch needs reverting from master/dunfell. I hope it hasn't gone into
the M4 build...

-- 
Paul Barker
Konsulko Group

  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-07 19:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-04  8:34 [PATCH 1/2] wic: Fix permissions when using exclude or include path Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
2020-03-04  8:34 ` [PATCH 2/2] wic: Add --embed-rootfs argument Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
2020-03-04  9:42   ` Paul Barker
2020-03-04  9:56     ` Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
2020-03-04 10:08       ` Paul Barker
2020-03-04 10:14         ` Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
2020-03-04 13:49           ` Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
2020-03-04 14:31             ` Joshua Watt
2020-03-04  9:53 ` [PATCH 1/2] wic: Fix permissions when using exclude or include path Paul Barker
2020-03-04 10:02   ` Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
2020-03-05  9:28     ` Paul Barker
2020-03-05  9:46       ` Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
2020-04-03 19:53         ` [OE-core] " Ricardo Ribalda
2020-04-07 18:12           ` Paul Barker
2020-04-07 18:40             ` Ricardo Ribalda
2020-04-07 19:02               ` Paul Barker [this message]
2020-04-07 19:19                 ` Ricardo Ribalda
2020-04-07 19:43                   ` Paul Barker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200407200236.748931eb@ub1910 \
    --to=pbarker@konsulko.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    --cc=ricardo@ribalda.com \
    --cc=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.