From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0853C5518B for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 07:46:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A56A0206E9 for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 07:46:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nic.cz header.i=@nic.cz header.b="jYxWAJwE" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726423AbgDVHqM (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Apr 2020 03:46:12 -0400 Received: from lists.nic.cz ([217.31.204.67]:44682 "EHLO mail.nic.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725786AbgDVHqL (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Apr 2020 03:46:11 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [172.20.6.135]) by mail.nic.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7064513F7F8; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 09:46:09 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=nic.cz; s=default; t=1587541569; bh=/oDiupn/mTAclohZx7XI0pHwaADzqQyl/21YtK44EaQ=; h=Date:From:To; b=jYxWAJwEyP2+19xvwPraDFbo6Snd5xZpc3NVkdAjo5tBPCNJ8SlH0yqhhYcdO9P9k qOA7EPp+i0+j7+8uYrUhYQWblCpEnAgksGWD9ljsCVrnBI06IuL/5b8AQxhgFW0WhP yx6apS2Q3j6njBJBnNr/dgpNPJgOxoP8FJgPzmQM= Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 09:46:07 +0200 From: Marek Behun To: Qu Wenruo Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, fstests@vger.kernel.org, u-boot@lists.denx.de Subject: Re: [PATCH U-BOOT 00/26] fs: btrfs: Re-implement btrfs support using the more widely used extent buffer base code Message-ID: <20200422094607.1797ce2e@nic.cz> In-Reply-To: <20200422065009.69392-1-wqu@suse.com> References: <20200422065009.69392-1-wqu@suse.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.101.4 at mail X-Virus-Status: Clean Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 22 Apr 2020 14:49:43 +0800 Qu Wenruo wrote: Hi Qu, > The current btrfs code in U-boot is using a creative way to read on-disk > data. > It's pretty simple, involving the least amount of code, but pretty > different from btrfs-progs nor kernel, making it pretty hard to sync > code between different projects. do you think maybe btrfs-progs / kernel would be interested if I tried to convert their code to this "simpler to use" implementation of conversion functions? > Thus only the following 5 patches need extra review attention: > - Patch 0017 > - Patch 0018 > - Patch 0022 > - Patch 0023 > - Patch 0024 Anyway, this patch series does not apply cleanly on u-boot/master. I tried with the first 3 patches and then gave up :( Sorry about this but I will review and test if you send a series that applies cleanly. Marek From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marek Behun Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 09:46:07 +0200 Subject: [PATCH U-BOOT 00/26] fs: btrfs: Re-implement btrfs support using the more widely used extent buffer base code In-Reply-To: <20200422065009.69392-1-wqu@suse.com> References: <20200422065009.69392-1-wqu@suse.com> Message-ID: <20200422094607.1797ce2e@nic.cz> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Wed, 22 Apr 2020 14:49:43 +0800 Qu Wenruo wrote: Hi Qu, > The current btrfs code in U-boot is using a creative way to read on-disk > data. > It's pretty simple, involving the least amount of code, but pretty > different from btrfs-progs nor kernel, making it pretty hard to sync > code between different projects. do you think maybe btrfs-progs / kernel would be interested if I tried to convert their code to this "simpler to use" implementation of conversion functions? > Thus only the following 5 patches need extra review attention: > - Patch 0017 > - Patch 0018 > - Patch 0022 > - Patch 0023 > - Patch 0024 Anyway, this patch series does not apply cleanly on u-boot/master. I tried with the first 3 patches and then gave up :( Sorry about this but I will review and test if you send a series that applies cleanly. Marek