All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
To: qemu-block@nongnu.org
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, fam@euphon.net, vsementsov@virtuozzo.com,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mreitz@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com,
	den@openvz.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/9] block/io: refactor bdrv_is_allocated_above to run only one coroutine
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 17:38:59 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200427143907.5710-2-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200427143907.5710-1-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>

bdrv_is_allocated_above creates new coroutine on each iteration if
called from non-coroutine context. To simplify expansion of in_flight
inc/dec sections in further patch let's refactor it.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
---
 block/io.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 71 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/io.c b/block/io.c
index aba67f66b9..94ab8eaa0f 100644
--- a/block/io.c
+++ b/block/io.c
@@ -2482,6 +2482,22 @@ static int coroutine_fn bdrv_co_block_status_above(BlockDriverState *bs,
     return ret;
 }
 
+static int coroutine_fn bdrv_co_is_allocated(BlockDriverState *bs,
+                                             int64_t offset, int64_t bytes,
+                                             int64_t *pnum)
+{
+    int ret;
+    int64_t dummy;
+
+    ret = bdrv_co_block_status_above(bs, backing_bs(bs), false, offset,
+                                     bytes, pnum ? pnum : &dummy, NULL,
+                                     NULL);
+    if (ret < 0) {
+        return ret;
+    }
+    return !!(ret & BDRV_BLOCK_ALLOCATED);
+}
+
 /* Coroutine wrapper for bdrv_block_status_above() */
 static void coroutine_fn bdrv_block_status_above_co_entry(void *opaque)
 {
@@ -2578,10 +2594,10 @@ int coroutine_fn bdrv_is_allocated(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t offset,
  * but 'pnum' will only be 0 when end of file is reached.
  *
  */
-int bdrv_is_allocated_above(BlockDriverState *top,
-                            BlockDriverState *base,
-                            bool include_base, int64_t offset,
-                            int64_t bytes, int64_t *pnum)
+static int coroutine_fn
+bdrv_co_is_allocated_above(BlockDriverState *top, BlockDriverState *base,
+                           bool include_base, int64_t offset, int64_t bytes,
+                           int64_t *pnum)
 {
     BlockDriverState *intermediate;
     int ret;
@@ -2595,7 +2611,7 @@ int bdrv_is_allocated_above(BlockDriverState *top,
         int64_t size_inter;
 
         assert(intermediate);
-        ret = bdrv_is_allocated(intermediate, offset, bytes, &pnum_inter);
+        ret = bdrv_co_is_allocated(intermediate, offset, bytes, &pnum_inter);
         if (ret < 0) {
             return ret;
         }
@@ -2624,6 +2640,56 @@ int bdrv_is_allocated_above(BlockDriverState *top,
     return 0;
 }
 
+typedef struct BdrvCoIsAllocatedAboveData {
+    BlockDriverState *top;
+    BlockDriverState *base;
+    bool include_base;
+    int64_t offset;
+    int64_t bytes;
+    int64_t *pnum;
+    int ret;
+    bool done;
+} BdrvCoIsAllocatedAboveData;
+
+static void coroutine_fn bdrv_is_allocated_above_co_entry(void *opaque)
+{
+    BdrvCoIsAllocatedAboveData *data = opaque;
+
+    data->ret = bdrv_co_is_allocated_above(data->top, data->base,
+                                           data->include_base,
+                                           data->offset, data->bytes,
+                                           data->pnum);
+    data->done = true;
+    aio_wait_kick();
+}
+
+int bdrv_is_allocated_above(BlockDriverState *top, BlockDriverState *base,
+                            bool include_base, int64_t offset, int64_t bytes,
+                            int64_t *pnum)
+{
+    Coroutine *co;
+    BdrvCoIsAllocatedAboveData data = {
+        .top = top,
+        .base = base,
+        .include_base = include_base,
+        .offset = offset,
+        .bytes = bytes,
+        .pnum = pnum,
+        .done = false,
+    };
+
+    if (qemu_in_coroutine()) {
+        /* Fast-path if already in coroutine context */
+        bdrv_is_allocated_above_co_entry(&data);
+    } else {
+        co = qemu_coroutine_create(bdrv_is_allocated_above_co_entry, &data);
+        bdrv_coroutine_enter(top, co);
+        BDRV_POLL_WHILE(top, !data.done);
+    }
+
+    return data.ret;
+}
+
 typedef struct BdrvVmstateCo {
     BlockDriverState    *bs;
     QEMUIOVector        *qiov;
-- 
2.21.0



  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-27 14:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-27 14:38 [PATCH v2 0/9] block/io: safer inc/dec in_flight sections Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-04-27 14:38 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy [this message]
2020-05-01 21:25   ` [PATCH v2 1/9] block/io: refactor bdrv_is_allocated_above to run only one coroutine Eric Blake
2020-04-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] block/io: refactor bdrv_co_ioctl: move aio stuff to corresponding block Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-04-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] block/io: move flush and pdiscard stuff down Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-04-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] block/io: move bdrv_rw_co_entry and friends down Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-04-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] block/io: expand in_flight inc/dec section: simple cases Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-05-01 21:43   ` Eric Blake
2020-05-06  7:02   ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-05-18 18:21     ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-05-19 10:52     ` Kevin Wolf
2020-05-19 11:06       ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-05-19 11:16         ` Kevin Wolf
2020-05-19 11:25           ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-05-19 14:01             ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-05-19 14:33               ` Kevin Wolf
2020-05-19 16:54                 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-05-19 11:04   ` Kevin Wolf
2020-04-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] block/io: expand in_flight inc/dec section: block-status Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-05-01 22:00   ` Eric Blake
2020-05-19 10:57     ` Kevin Wolf
2020-04-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] block/io: add bdrv_do_pwrite_zeroes Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-05-01 22:05   ` Eric Blake
2020-04-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] block/io: move bdrv_make_zero under block-status Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-04-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] block/io: expand in_flight inc/dec section: bdrv_make_zero Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-05-01 22:08   ` Eric Blake
2020-05-19 11:18 ` [PATCH v2 0/9] block/io: safer inc/dec in_flight sections Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200427143907.5710-2-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
    --to=vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=den@openvz.org \
    --cc=fam@euphon.net \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.