From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C72FC83003 for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 10:00:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 422CB208FE for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 10:00:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="GoEdJCAo" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 422CB208FE Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:34232 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jTjW8-0001ww-FC for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 06:00:36 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36878) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jTjVI-0001Sk-45 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 05:59:44 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jTjVG-0002Zq-BS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 05:59:43 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.120]:52804 helo=us-smtp-1.mimecast.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jTjVF-0002ZM-Np for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 05:59:41 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1588154379; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=6jYOq4Gb+OkYpVamoTbaBqMjn4E1fE8/sdbhLXcJUPY=; b=GoEdJCAocUbisWES2VWaBEDPc1nI+rayO2qQYuH/k3drBfIsWJPqykmCcvqy08IYs+E4Xt 5OD0+d4PZCsKdIVaP7iumwe1kgTIUgGA3rUc5gsDvBrOJXB5ysbGeI+UP+H1P3LRl5MKW8 1Zdmy7YEJZlJDzlMd4TfJhoKxzYSChY= Received: from mail-wm1-f72.google.com (mail-wm1-f72.google.com [209.85.128.72]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-89-mzUDz_ofPTucDPfcUQlXhA-1; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 05:59:38 -0400 X-MC-Unique: mzUDz_ofPTucDPfcUQlXhA-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f72.google.com with SMTP id t62so1000267wma.0 for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 02:59:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=JYxdyAlutb9zDaOY9t3Vu3+pNQAF3vOgY2lUUuKWw+M=; b=qVAoiLxezlDMJoSapPYupSDirlmRAtmbywggjuZzk97pCtTHlId7i775YxKgyFLrZt 9PE4PIZ9an6vFDJKI4ccye6kvXm1WcP3h1iHLxFB5VM9U8y/gp1Jb0bdiS2kgYHX1cNn FydclmT5uMtxfW8/H6mCOKU1L3JDA+tDr3OoWZh7s0HT5W+n2JJ7vhePEcZz8tmSlr6D 15Nt693M1rR8nWl77DLAUeyaV8tnl3GFqC37rQ5OVQe8FSLjKBIaNoHm7il9BKnu8HOi /q2XbAk9rYGWTp1zgbT4vdX0ehUR1gIo4m7jbD/4ZnuPSGcUlrxdCJr86jI98bwOVqg+ e0OA== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuYxTd7Muz/qugk9+ptJdMd9ZxM3nhjjNXh3DsfmPfLQEjV5ydWm pALFTYtpVP2+YOeUqN0/EUihXp/V/3EEDRsdR2W6tWXsMmSeJM9RwGONDkyl1296tTLm0L6pax0 9B2XHmPJvJUHia+Q= X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:c8:: with SMTP id u8mr2451637wmm.142.1588154377005; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 02:59:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypK/7CegLYWmlY3x0cK612JYNPQcPXZkkFHuAc/jVZiBak5TvPqkLToP/Ypa0vKcGBgldmemUg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:c8:: with SMTP id u8mr2451602wmm.142.1588154376821; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 02:59:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from redhat.com (bzq-109-66-7-121.red.bezeqint.net. [109.66.7.121]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w6sm30327391wrm.86.2020.04.29.02.59.34 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 29 Apr 2020 02:59:36 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 05:59:32 -0400 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" To: Stefan Hajnoczi Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v6 00/36] Initial support for multi-process qemu Message-ID: <20200429055243-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <20200428172920.GA111124@stefanha-x1.localdomain> <20200428134350-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <20200429093030.GD122432@stefanha-x1.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200429093030.GD122432@stefanha-x1.localdomain> X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Received-SPF: pass client-ip=207.211.31.120; envelope-from=mst@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-1.mimecast.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/04/29 01:18:10 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 207.211.31.120 X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: elena.ufimtseva@oracle.com, fam@euphon.net, swapnil.ingle@nutanix.com, john.g.johnson@oracle.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kraxel@redhat.com, jag.raman@oracle.com, quintela@redhat.com, armbru@redhat.com, kanth.ghatraju@oracle.com, felipe@nutanix.com, thuth@redhat.com, ehabkost@redhat.com, konrad.wilk@oracle.com, dgilbert@redhat.com, liran.alon@oracle.com, thanos.makatos@nutanix.com, rth@twiddle.net, kwolf@redhat.com, berrange@redhat.com, mreitz@redhat.com, ross.lagerwall@citrix.com, marcandre.lureau@gmail.com, pbonzini@redhat.com Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 10:30:30AM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > > > I suggest dropping the remote device program from this patch series (= and > > > maybe never bringing it back). Instead, use the softmmu target for t= he > > > remote device. ... > >=20 > > Building QEMU twices just to get the remote is however not very > > attractive. So how about making remote a special target? > > Either remote-softmmu/ or if impossible x86_64-remote-softmmu/ >=20 > Yes, that's a good idea. It needs to be the full x86_64-remote-softmmu > because hw/ code depends on the QEMU target :(. BTW using QEMU as backend source also gives us goodies such as cross-version compatibility for free. --=20 MST