From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 019EEC83009 for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 12:59:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCF732137B for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 12:59:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1588165154; bh=OKP5q1kfJMOz1V+mDLpdq/wbCs1bmXk3Ojz8StqzR2U=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=2HcA/ZZlU8qSxJs79bRySym0F31aSaDTVFL+BKEsB/+f9y1QMb4HvzI4799A0LDys SHpo7UCsQt5vbnrqDCZaTBh0jxEmKgPwjSGi/mXd8qVfjD0C/VnnaRM9iYL3TuBSkg 79tzhMBMib5Pxu4fg/MrQcF6ZXNYeKc4A4uNP9w4= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727101AbgD2M7O (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Apr 2020 08:59:14 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:33328 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726776AbgD2M7L (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Apr 2020 08:59:11 -0400 Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D8E62214D8; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 12:59:10 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1588165151; bh=OKP5q1kfJMOz1V+mDLpdq/wbCs1bmXk3Ojz8StqzR2U=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=AmfIypLl0/vQsEejNzGbUfn67N+qyG7qPxvX6J+KzLILZHuIgCNRCZJbX3YtMUap9 +WjLBx/JlHwjMpLCN5YLvfvo0jISKvGFwq+hfhsq9fAmXqVc+/8OUimTYNNKh7aX6G j6T/r6v9658saDBnrdWCBZ5HIsrzp2S2Ady2OEDY= Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 14:59:09 +0200 From: Greg KH To: ashwin-h Cc: tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org, srivatsab@vmware.com, srivatsa@csail.mit.edu, rostedt@goodmis.org, srostedt@vmware.com, ashwin.hiranniah@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Backport to 4.9- ext4: protect journal inode's blocks using block_validity Message-ID: <20200429125909.GA2124190@kroah.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 12:51:34AM +0530, ashwin-h wrote: > [PATCH 1/5] ext4: avoid declaring fs inconsistent due to invalid file > handles > This patch is backported as functionality in this commit is used by > Patch 2 in this patchset. > > [PATCH 2/5] ext4: protect journal inode's blocks using block_validity > Backport to 4.9 > > [PATCH 3/5] ext4: don't perform block validity checks on the journal > [PATCH 4/5] ext4: fix block validity checks for journal inodes using > [PATCH 5/5] ext4: unsigned int compared against zero > Fixes issues found in Patch 2 in this patchset. > > These patches addresses CVE-2019-19319 I can't take patches for 4.9 that are not also in 4.14, for the obvious reason that you never want to upgrade to a newer kernel and get regressions. So can you provide a backported series for the 4.14 tree too? Then I can take these. thanks, greg k-h