All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
To: qemu-block@nongnu.org
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, fam@euphon.net, integration@gluster.org,
	berto@igalia.com, pavel.dovgaluk@ispras.ru, dillaman@redhat.com,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, sw@weilnetz.de, pl@kamp.de,
	ronniesahlberg@gmail.com, mreitz@redhat.com, den@openvz.org,
	sheepdog@lists.wpkg.org, vsementsov@virtuozzo.com,
	stefanha@redhat.com, namei.unix@gmail.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
	jsnow@redhat.com, ari@tuxera.com
Subject: [PATCH v3 06/17] block/io: support int64_t bytes in bdrv_aligned_pwritev()
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 14:10:22 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200430111033.29980-7-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200430111033.29980-1-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>

We are generally moving to int64_t for both offset and bytes parameters
on all io paths.

Main motivation is realization of 64-bit write_zeroes operation for
fast zeroing large disk chunks, up to the whole disk.

We chose signed type, to be consistent with off_t (which is signed) and
with possibility for signed return type (where negative value means
error).

So, prepare bdrv_aligned_pwritev() now and convert the dependencies:
bdrv_co_write_req_prepare() and bdrv_co_write_req_finish() to signed
type bytes.

Series: 64bit-block-status
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
---
 block/io.c | 17 ++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/io.c b/block/io.c
index b83749cc50..8bb4ea6285 100644
--- a/block/io.c
+++ b/block/io.c
@@ -1686,12 +1686,11 @@ fail:
 }
 
 static inline int coroutine_fn
-bdrv_co_write_req_prepare(BdrvChild *child, int64_t offset, uint64_t bytes,
+bdrv_co_write_req_prepare(BdrvChild *child, int64_t offset, int64_t bytes,
                           BdrvTrackedRequest *req, int flags)
 {
     BlockDriverState *bs = child->bs;
     bool waited;
-    int64_t end_sector = DIV_ROUND_UP(offset + bytes, BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE);
 
     if (bs->read_only) {
         return -EPERM;
@@ -1716,8 +1715,10 @@ bdrv_co_write_req_prepare(BdrvChild *child, int64_t offset, uint64_t bytes,
     }
 
     assert(req->overlap_offset <= offset);
+    assert(offset <= INT64_MAX - bytes);
     assert(offset + bytes <= req->overlap_offset + req->overlap_bytes);
-    assert(end_sector <= bs->total_sectors || child->perm & BLK_PERM_RESIZE);
+    assert(offset + bytes <= bs->total_sectors * BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE ||
+           child->perm & BLK_PERM_RESIZE);
 
     switch (req->type) {
     case BDRV_TRACKED_WRITE:
@@ -1738,7 +1739,7 @@ bdrv_co_write_req_prepare(BdrvChild *child, int64_t offset, uint64_t bytes,
 }
 
 static inline void coroutine_fn
-bdrv_co_write_req_finish(BdrvChild *child, int64_t offset, uint64_t bytes,
+bdrv_co_write_req_finish(BdrvChild *child, int64_t offset, int64_t bytes,
                          BdrvTrackedRequest *req, int ret)
 {
     int64_t end_sector = DIV_ROUND_UP(offset + bytes, BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE);
@@ -1780,14 +1781,14 @@ bdrv_co_write_req_finish(BdrvChild *child, int64_t offset, uint64_t bytes,
  * after possibly fragmenting it.
  */
 static int coroutine_fn bdrv_aligned_pwritev(BdrvChild *child,
-    BdrvTrackedRequest *req, int64_t offset, unsigned int bytes,
+    BdrvTrackedRequest *req, int64_t offset, int64_t bytes,
     int64_t align, QEMUIOVector *qiov, size_t qiov_offset, int flags)
 {
     BlockDriverState *bs = child->bs;
     BlockDriver *drv = bs->drv;
     int ret;
 
-    uint64_t bytes_remaining = bytes;
+    int64_t bytes_remaining = bytes;
     int max_transfer;
 
     if (!drv) {
@@ -1799,6 +1800,8 @@ static int coroutine_fn bdrv_aligned_pwritev(BdrvChild *child,
     }
 
     assert(is_power_of_2(align));
+    assert(offset >= 0);
+    assert(bytes >= 0);
     assert((offset & (align - 1)) == 0);
     assert((bytes & (align - 1)) == 0);
     assert(!qiov || qiov_offset + bytes <= qiov->size);
@@ -1899,7 +1902,7 @@ static int coroutine_fn bdrv_co_do_zero_pwritev(BdrvChild *child,
     assert(!bytes || (offset & (align - 1)) == 0);
     if (bytes >= align) {
         /* Write the aligned part in the middle. */
-        uint64_t aligned_bytes = bytes & ~(align - 1);
+        int64_t aligned_bytes = bytes & ~(align - 1);
         ret = bdrv_aligned_pwritev(child, req, offset, aligned_bytes, align,
                                    NULL, 0, flags);
         if (ret < 0) {
-- 
2.21.0



  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-04-30 11:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-30 11:10 [PATCH v3 00/17] 64bit block-layer Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-04-30 11:10 ` [PATCH v3 01/17] block/throttle-groups: throttle_group_co_io_limits_intercept(): 64bit bytes Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-05-11 15:28   ` Alberto Garcia
2020-04-30 11:10 ` [PATCH v3 02/17] block: use int64_t as bytes type in tracked requests Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-05-11 15:32   ` Alberto Garcia
2020-05-22 19:09   ` Eric Blake
2020-04-30 11:10 ` [PATCH v3 03/17] block/io: use int64_t bytes parameter in bdrv_check_byte_request() Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-05-11 15:57   ` Alberto Garcia
2020-04-30 11:10 ` [PATCH v3 04/17] block/io: use int64_t bytes in driver wrappers Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-05-11 16:30   ` Alberto Garcia
2020-04-30 11:10 ` [PATCH v3 05/17] block/io: support int64_t bytes in bdrv_co_do_pwrite_zeroes() Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-05-08 18:20   ` Eric Blake
2020-05-11 17:17   ` Alberto Garcia
2020-05-11 18:34     ` Eric Blake
2020-06-23 10:20       ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-06-23 16:37         ` Eric Blake
2020-04-30 11:10 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy [this message]
2020-05-08 20:38   ` [PATCH v3 06/17] block/io: support int64_t bytes in bdrv_aligned_pwritev() Eric Blake
2020-06-18 14:29   ` Alberto Garcia
2020-04-30 11:10 ` [PATCH v3 07/17] block/io: support int64_t bytes in bdrv_co_do_copy_on_readv() Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-05-21 22:29   ` Eric Blake
2020-05-22  6:30     ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-04-30 11:10 ` [PATCH v3 08/17] block/io: support int64_t bytes in bdrv_aligned_preadv() Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-05-22 15:14   ` Eric Blake
2020-06-18 14:35     ` Alberto Garcia
2020-06-18 14:47       ` Eric Blake
2020-04-30 11:10 ` [PATCH v3 09/17] block/io: support int64_t bytes in bdrv_co_p{read, write}v_part() Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-05-22 19:34   ` [PATCH v3 09/17] block/io: support int64_t bytes in bdrv_co_p{read,write}v_part() Eric Blake
2020-04-30 11:10 ` [PATCH v3 10/17] block/io: support int64_t bytes in read/write wrappers Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-04-30 11:10 ` [PATCH v3 11/17] block/io: use int64_t bytes in copy_range Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-04-30 11:10 ` [PATCH v3 12/17] block/block-backend: convert blk io path to use int64_t parameters Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-06-23 22:11   ` Eric Blake
2020-04-30 11:10 ` [PATCH v3 13/17] block: use int64_t instead of uint64_t in driver read handlers Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-04-30 11:10 ` [PATCH v3 14/17] block: use int64_t instead of uint64_t in driver write handlers Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-04-30 11:10 ` [PATCH v3 15/17] block: use int64_t instead of uint64_t in copy_range driver handlers Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-04-30 11:10 ` [PATCH v3 16/17] block: use int64_t instead of int in driver write_zeroes handlers Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-04-30 11:10 ` [PATCH v3 17/17] block: use int64_t instead of int in driver discard handlers Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-05-06  6:40   ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-04-30 20:51 ` [PATCH v3 00/17] 64bit block-layer no-reply
2020-05-06  6:39   ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-04-30 20:57 ` no-reply
2020-12-01 16:07 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-12-01 16:56   ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-12-01 21:50   ` Eric Blake

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200430111033.29980-7-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
    --to=vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=ari@tuxera.com \
    --cc=berto@igalia.com \
    --cc=den@openvz.org \
    --cc=dillaman@redhat.com \
    --cc=fam@euphon.net \
    --cc=integration@gluster.org \
    --cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=namei.unix@gmail.com \
    --cc=pavel.dovgaluk@ispras.ru \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=pl@kamp.de \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=ronniesahlberg@gmail.com \
    --cc=sheepdog@lists.wpkg.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=sw@weilnetz.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.