All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Shile Zhang <shile.zhang@linux.alibaba.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Tzvetomir Stoyanov <tz.stoyanov@gmail.com>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] x86/mm: Sync all vmalloc mappings before text_poke()
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 21:14:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200430191434.GC8135@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200430121136.6d7aeb22@gandalf.local.home>

On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 12:11:36PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> bool trace_event_ignore_this_pid(struct trace_event_file *trace_file)
> {
> 	struct trace_array *tr = trace_file->tr;
> 	struct trace_array_cpu *data;
> 	struct trace_pid_list *no_pid_list;
> 	struct trace_pid_list *pid_list;
> 
> 	pid_list = rcu_dereference_raw(tr->filtered_pids);
> 	no_pid_list = rcu_dereference_raw(tr->filtered_no_pids);
> 
> 	if (!pid_list && !no_pid_list)
> 		return false;
> 
> 	data = this_cpu_ptr(tr->array_buffer.data);
> 
> 	return data->ignore_pid;
> }
>
> [...]
> 
> tl;dr; It's not an issue with the vmalloc, it's an issue with per_cpu
> allocations!

Yes, looks like you are right, it faults on the return statement, so the
data-pointer seems not to be mapped. I looked at another instance:

The trapping instruction is:

	movzbl 0x7c(%rax),%eax

Which is a pointer-dereference, with %rax=0xffffe8ffffccc870. The 'data'
pointer is allocated with alloc_percpu().

And alloc_percpu() calls down into pcpu_alloc(), which allocates new
percpu chunks using vmalloc() on x86. And there we are again in the
vmalloc area.

Regards,

	Joerg

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-04-30 19:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-29  9:48 [RFC][PATCH] x86/mm: Sync all vmalloc mappings before text_poke() Steven Rostedt
2020-04-29 10:59 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-04-29 12:28   ` Steven Rostedt
2020-04-29 14:07     ` Steven Rostedt
2020-04-29 14:10       ` Joerg Roedel
2020-04-29 14:32         ` Steven Rostedt
2020-04-29 15:44           ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-04-29 16:17       ` Joerg Roedel
2020-04-29 16:20         ` Joerg Roedel
2020-04-29 16:52           ` Steven Rostedt
2020-04-29 17:29             ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-04-29 18:51               ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-04-30 14:11       ` Joerg Roedel
2020-04-30 14:50         ` Joerg Roedel
2020-04-30 15:20           ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-04-30 16:16             ` Steven Rostedt
2020-04-30 16:18               ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-04-30 16:30                 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-04-30 16:35                   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-04-30 15:23         ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-04-30 16:12           ` Steven Rostedt
2020-04-30 16:11         ` Steven Rostedt
2020-04-30 16:16           ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-04-30 16:25             ` Steven Rostedt
2020-04-30 19:14           ` Joerg Roedel [this message]
2020-05-01  1:13             ` Steven Rostedt
2020-05-01  2:26               ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-05-01  2:39                 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-05-01 10:16                   ` Joerg Roedel
2020-05-01 13:35                   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-05-04 15:12                   ` [PATCH] percpu: Sync vmalloc mappings in pcpu_alloc() and free_percpu() Joerg Roedel
2020-05-04 15:28                     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-05-04 15:31                       ` Joerg Roedel
2020-05-04 15:38                         ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-05-04 15:51                           ` Joerg Roedel
2020-05-04 17:04                           ` Steven Rostedt
2020-05-04 17:40                     ` Steven Rostedt
2020-05-04 18:38                       ` Joerg Roedel
2020-05-04 19:10                         ` Steven Rostedt
2020-05-05 12:31                           ` [PATCH] tracing: Call vmalloc_sync_mappings() after alloc_percpu() Joerg Roedel
2020-05-06 15:17                             ` Steven Rostedt
2020-05-08 14:42                               ` Joerg Roedel
2020-05-04 20:25                     ` [PATCH] percpu: Sync vmalloc mappings in pcpu_alloc() and free_percpu() Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-04 20:43                       ` Steven Rostedt
2020-05-01  4:20                 ` [RFC][PATCH] x86/mm: Sync all vmalloc mappings before text_poke() Steven Rostedt
2020-05-01 13:22                   ` Mathieu Desnoyers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200430191434.GC8135@suse.de \
    --to=jroedel@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=shile.zhang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tz.stoyanov@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.