All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pu Xu <583493798@qq.com>
To: konstantin.ananyev@intel.com
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Pu Xu <583493798@qq.com>,
	anatoly.burakov@intel.com, stable@dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ip_frag: fix fragmenting ipv4 packet with header option
Date: Sat,  2 May 2020 00:16:03 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200501161603.33907-1-583493798@qq.com> (raw)

When fragmenting ipv4 packet, the data offset should be calculated through
the ihl field in ip header rather than using sizeof(struct rte_ipv4_hdr).

Fixes: 4c38e5532a07 ("ip_frag: refactor IPv4 fragmentation into a proper library")
Cc: anatoly.burakov@intel.com
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Pu Xu <583493798@qq.com>
---
 lib/librte_ip_frag/rte_ipv4_fragmentation.c | 34 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/librte_ip_frag/rte_ipv4_fragmentation.c b/lib/librte_ip_frag/rte_ipv4_fragmentation.c
index e9de335ae..2e7739d02 100644
--- a/lib/librte_ip_frag/rte_ipv4_fragmentation.c
+++ b/lib/librte_ip_frag/rte_ipv4_fragmentation.c
@@ -23,10 +23,10 @@
 #define	IPV4_HDR_FO_ALIGN			(1 << RTE_IPV4_HDR_FO_SHIFT)
 
 static inline void __fill_ipv4hdr_frag(struct rte_ipv4_hdr *dst,
-		const struct rte_ipv4_hdr *src, uint16_t len, uint16_t fofs,
-		uint16_t dofs, uint32_t mf)
+		const struct rte_ipv4_hdr *src, uint16_t header_len,
+		uint16_t len, uint16_t fofs, uint16_t dofs, uint32_t mf)
 {
-	rte_memcpy(dst, src, sizeof(*dst));
+	rte_memcpy(dst, src, header_len);
 	fofs = (uint16_t)(fofs + (dofs >> RTE_IPV4_HDR_FO_SHIFT));
 	fofs = (uint16_t)(fofs | mf << RTE_IPV4_HDR_MF_SHIFT);
 	dst->fragment_offset = rte_cpu_to_be_16(fofs);
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ rte_ipv4_fragment_packet(struct rte_mbuf *pkt_in,
 	struct rte_ipv4_hdr *in_hdr;
 	uint32_t out_pkt_pos, in_seg_data_pos;
 	uint32_t more_in_segs;
-	uint16_t fragment_offset, flag_offset, frag_size;
+	uint16_t fragment_offset, flag_offset, frag_size, header_len;
 	uint16_t frag_bytes_remaining;
 
 	/*
@@ -86,14 +86,22 @@ rte_ipv4_fragment_packet(struct rte_mbuf *pkt_in,
 	    unlikely(mtu_size < RTE_ETHER_MIN_MTU))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
+	in_hdr = rte_pktmbuf_mtod(pkt_in, struct rte_ipv4_hdr *);
+	header_len = (in_hdr->version_ihl & RTE_IPV4_HDR_IHL_MASK) *
+	    RTE_IPV4_IHL_MULTIPLIER;
+
+	/* Check IP header length */
+	if (unlikely(pkt_in->data_len < header_len) ||
+	    unlikely(mtu_size < header_len))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	/*
 	 * Ensure the IP payload length of all fragments is aligned to a
 	 * multiple of 8 bytes as per RFC791 section 2.3.
 	 */
-	frag_size = RTE_ALIGN_FLOOR((mtu_size - sizeof(struct rte_ipv4_hdr)),
+	frag_size = RTE_ALIGN_FLOOR((mtu_size - header_len),
 				    IPV4_HDR_FO_ALIGN);
 
-	in_hdr = rte_pktmbuf_mtod(pkt_in, struct rte_ipv4_hdr *);
 	flag_offset = rte_cpu_to_be_16(in_hdr->fragment_offset);
 
 	/* If Don't Fragment flag is set */
@@ -102,11 +110,11 @@ rte_ipv4_fragment_packet(struct rte_mbuf *pkt_in,
 
 	/* Check that pkts_out is big enough to hold all fragments */
 	if (unlikely(frag_size * nb_pkts_out <
-	    (uint16_t)(pkt_in->pkt_len - sizeof(struct rte_ipv4_hdr))))
+	    (uint16_t)(pkt_in->pkt_len - header_len)))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	in_seg = pkt_in;
-	in_seg_data_pos = sizeof(struct rte_ipv4_hdr);
+	in_seg_data_pos = header_len;
 	out_pkt_pos = 0;
 	fragment_offset = 0;
 
@@ -124,8 +132,8 @@ rte_ipv4_fragment_packet(struct rte_mbuf *pkt_in,
 		}
 
 		/* Reserve space for the IP header that will be built later */
-		out_pkt->data_len = sizeof(struct rte_ipv4_hdr);
-		out_pkt->pkt_len = sizeof(struct rte_ipv4_hdr);
+		out_pkt->data_len = header_len;
+		out_pkt->pkt_len = header_len;
 		frag_bytes_remaining = frag_size;
 
 		out_seg_prev = out_pkt;
@@ -176,14 +184,14 @@ rte_ipv4_fragment_packet(struct rte_mbuf *pkt_in,
 
 		out_hdr = rte_pktmbuf_mtod(out_pkt, struct rte_ipv4_hdr *);
 
-		__fill_ipv4hdr_frag(out_hdr, in_hdr,
+		__fill_ipv4hdr_frag(out_hdr, in_hdr, header_len,
 		    (uint16_t)out_pkt->pkt_len,
 		    flag_offset, fragment_offset, more_in_segs);
 
 		fragment_offset = (uint16_t)(fragment_offset +
-		    out_pkt->pkt_len - sizeof(struct rte_ipv4_hdr));
+		    out_pkt->pkt_len - header_len);
 
-		out_pkt->l3_len = sizeof(struct rte_ipv4_hdr);
+		out_pkt->l3_len = header_len;
 
 		/* Write the fragment to the output list */
 		pkts_out[out_pkt_pos] = out_pkt;
-- 
2.17.0


             reply	other threads:[~2020-05-01 16:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-01 16:16 Pu Xu [this message]
2021-03-25 10:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] When fragmenting ipv4 packet, the data offset should be calculated through the ihl field in ip header rather than using sizeof(struct rte_ipv4_hdr) 583493798
2021-03-25 11:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] ip_frag: fix fragmenting ipv4 packet with header option 583493798
2021-03-25 13:09   ` Aaron Conole
2021-04-06 13:53   ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2021-04-21 14:50     ` Thomas Monjalon
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-05-01 16:11 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Pu Xu
2020-05-01 20:43 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-05-24 15:27   ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-03-24 21:30     ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-05-01 13:50 Pu Xu
2020-05-01 13:27 Pu Xu
2020-05-01 15:32 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-05-01  0:12 Pu Xu
2020-05-01 10:58 ` Ananyev, Konstantin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200501161603.33907-1-583493798@qq.com \
    --to=583493798@qq.com \
    --cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.