From: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
To: acme@kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
mingo@redhat.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com
Cc: Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ak@linux.intel.com,
kan.liang@intel.com, yao.jin@intel.com,
Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] perf evsel: Create counts for collecting summary data
Date: Sat, 2 May 2020 10:07:04 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200502020705.19295-2-yao.jin@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200502020705.19295-1-yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
It would be useful to support the overall statistics for perf-stat
interval mode. For example, report the summary at the end of
"perf-stat -I" output.
But since perf-stat can support many aggregation modes, such as
--per-thread, --per-socket, -M and etc, we need a solution which
doesn't bring much complexity.
The idea is to create new 'evsel->summary_counts' which sums up the
counts delta per interval. Before reporting the summary, we copy the
data from evsel->summary_counts to evsel->counts, and next we just
follow current code.
v2:
---
Rebase to perf/core branch
Signed-off-by: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
---
tools/perf/util/evsel.c | 10 ++++++++--
tools/perf/util/evsel.h | 1 +
tools/perf/util/stat.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
index a75bcb95bf23..abc503dd6eda 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
@@ -1280,22 +1280,28 @@ void evsel__delete(struct evsel *evsel)
void evsel__compute_deltas(struct evsel *evsel, int cpu, int thread,
struct perf_counts_values *count)
{
- struct perf_counts_values tmp;
+ struct perf_counts_values tmp, *summary;
- if (!evsel->prev_raw_counts)
+ if (!evsel->prev_raw_counts || !evsel->summary_counts)
return;
if (cpu == -1) {
tmp = evsel->prev_raw_counts->aggr;
evsel->prev_raw_counts->aggr = *count;
+ summary = &evsel->summary_counts->aggr;
} else {
tmp = *perf_counts(evsel->prev_raw_counts, cpu, thread);
*perf_counts(evsel->prev_raw_counts, cpu, thread) = *count;
+ summary = perf_counts(evsel->summary_counts, cpu, thread);
}
count->val = count->val - tmp.val;
count->ena = count->ena - tmp.ena;
count->run = count->run - tmp.run;
+
+ summary->val += count->val;
+ summary->ena += count->ena;
+ summary->run += count->run;
}
void perf_counts_values__scale(struct perf_counts_values *count,
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.h b/tools/perf/util/evsel.h
index 783246bf8d0d..430639c99d04 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.h
+++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.h
@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ struct evsel {
char *filter;
struct perf_counts *counts;
struct perf_counts *prev_raw_counts;
+ struct perf_counts *summary_counts;
int idx;
unsigned long max_events;
unsigned long nr_events_printed;
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/stat.c b/tools/perf/util/stat.c
index 774468341851..c3fd008b4e84 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/stat.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/stat.c
@@ -171,6 +171,24 @@ static void perf_evsel__reset_prev_raw_counts(struct evsel *evsel)
}
}
+static int perf_evsel__alloc_summary_counts(struct evsel *evsel,
+ int ncpus, int nthreads)
+{
+ struct perf_counts *counts;
+
+ counts = perf_counts__new(ncpus, nthreads);
+ if (counts)
+ evsel->summary_counts = counts;
+
+ return counts ? 0 : -ENOMEM;
+}
+
+static void perf_evsel__free_summary_counts(struct evsel *evsel)
+{
+ perf_counts__delete(evsel->summary_counts);
+ evsel->summary_counts = NULL;
+}
+
static int perf_evsel__alloc_stats(struct evsel *evsel, bool alloc_raw)
{
int ncpus = evsel__nr_cpus(evsel);
@@ -178,6 +196,7 @@ static int perf_evsel__alloc_stats(struct evsel *evsel, bool alloc_raw)
if (perf_evsel__alloc_stat_priv(evsel) < 0 ||
perf_evsel__alloc_counts(evsel, ncpus, nthreads) < 0 ||
+ perf_evsel__alloc_summary_counts(evsel, ncpus, nthreads) < 0 ||
(alloc_raw && perf_evsel__alloc_prev_raw_counts(evsel, ncpus, nthreads) < 0))
return -ENOMEM;
@@ -208,6 +227,7 @@ void perf_evlist__free_stats(struct evlist *evlist)
perf_evsel__free_stat_priv(evsel);
perf_evsel__free_counts(evsel);
perf_evsel__free_prev_raw_counts(evsel);
+ perf_evsel__free_summary_counts(evsel);
}
}
--
2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-02 2:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-02 2:07 [PATCH v2 0/2] perf stat: Support overall statistics for interval mode Jin Yao
2020-05-02 2:07 ` Jin Yao [this message]
2020-05-04 23:50 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] perf evsel: Create counts for collecting summary data Jiri Olsa
2020-05-06 8:19 ` Jin, Yao
2020-05-02 2:07 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] perf stat: Report summary for interval mode Jin Yao
2020-05-04 23:41 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-05-06 10:52 ` Jin, Yao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200502020705.19295-2-yao.jin@linux.intel.com \
--to=yao.jin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=yao.jin@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.