All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Bharat Bhushan <bbhushan2@marvell.com>
Cc: jean-philippe@linaro.org, joro@8bytes.org, jasowang@redhat.com,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	eric.auger.pro@gmail.com, eric.auger@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] iommu/virtio: Use page size bitmap supported by endpoint
Date: Tue, 5 May 2020 20:22:37 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200505200659-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200505093004.1935-1-bbhushan2@marvell.com>

On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 03:00:04PM +0530, Bharat Bhushan wrote:
> Different endpoint can support different page size, probe
> endpoint if it supports specific page size otherwise use
> global page sizes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bharat Bhushan <bbhushan2@marvell.com>
> ---
> v4->v5:
>  - Rebase to Linux v5.7-rc4
> 
> v3->v4:
>  - Fix whitespace error
> 
> v2->v3:
>  - Fixed error return for incompatible endpoint
>  - __u64 changed to __le64 in header file
> 
>  drivers/iommu/virtio-iommu.c      | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  include/uapi/linux/virtio_iommu.h |  7 +++++
>  2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/virtio-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/virtio-iommu.c
> index d5cac4f46ca5..9513d2ab819e 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/virtio-iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/virtio-iommu.c
> @@ -78,6 +78,7 @@ struct viommu_endpoint {
>  	struct viommu_dev		*viommu;
>  	struct viommu_domain		*vdomain;
>  	struct list_head		resv_regions;
> +	u64				pgsize_bitmap;
>  };
>  
>  struct viommu_request {
> @@ -415,6 +416,19 @@ static int viommu_replay_mappings(struct viommu_domain *vdomain)
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +static int viommu_set_pgsize_bitmap(struct viommu_endpoint *vdev,
> +				    struct virtio_iommu_probe_pgsize_mask *mask,
> +				    size_t len)
> +{
> +	u64 pgsize_bitmap = le64_to_cpu(mask->pgsize_bitmap);
> +
> +	if (len < sizeof(*mask))

This is too late to validate length, you have dereferenced it already.
do it before the read pls.

> +		return -EINVAL;

OK but note that guest will then just proceed to ignore the
property. Is that really OK? Wouldn't host want to know?


> +
> +	vdev->pgsize_bitmap = pgsize_bitmap;

what if bitmap is 0? Is that a valid size? I see a bunch of
BUG_ON with that value ...

I also see a bunch of code like e.g. this:

        pg_size = 1UL << __ffs(pgsize_bitmap);

which probably won't DTRT on a 32 bit guest if the bitmap has bits
set in the high word.



> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static int viommu_add_resv_mem(struct viommu_endpoint *vdev,
>  			       struct virtio_iommu_probe_resv_mem *mem,
>  			       size_t len)
> @@ -499,6 +513,9 @@ static int viommu_probe_endpoint(struct viommu_dev *viommu, struct device *dev)
>  		case VIRTIO_IOMMU_PROBE_T_RESV_MEM:
>  			ret = viommu_add_resv_mem(vdev, (void *)prop, len);
>  			break;
> +		case VIRTIO_IOMMU_PROBE_T_PAGE_SIZE_MASK:
> +			ret = viommu_set_pgsize_bitmap(vdev, (void *)prop, len);
> +			break;
>  		default:
>  			dev_err(dev, "unknown viommu prop 0x%x\n", type);
>  		}
> @@ -630,7 +647,7 @@ static int viommu_domain_finalise(struct viommu_endpoint *vdev,
>  
>  	vdomain->id		= (unsigned int)ret;
>  
> -	domain->pgsize_bitmap	= viommu->pgsize_bitmap;
> +	domain->pgsize_bitmap	= vdev->pgsize_bitmap;
>  	domain->geometry	= viommu->geometry;
>  
>  	vdomain->map_flags	= viommu->map_flags;
> @@ -654,6 +671,29 @@ static void viommu_domain_free(struct iommu_domain *domain)
>  	kfree(vdomain);
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * Check whether the endpoint's capabilities are compatible with other
> + * endpoints in the domain. Report any inconsistency.
> + */
> +static bool viommu_endpoint_is_compatible(struct viommu_endpoint *vdev,
> +					  struct viommu_domain *vdomain)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = vdev->dev;
> +
> +	if (vdomain->viommu != vdev->viommu) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "cannot attach to foreign vIOMMU\n");
> +		return false;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (vdomain->domain.pgsize_bitmap != vdev->pgsize_bitmap) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "incompatible domain bitmap 0x%lx != 0x%llx\n",
> +			vdomain->domain.pgsize_bitmap, vdev->pgsize_bitmap);
> +		return false;
> +	}

I'm confused by this. So let's assume host supports pages sizes
of 4k, 2M, 1G. It signals this in the properties. Nice.
Now domain supports 4k, 2M and that's all. Why is that a problem?
Just don't use 1G ...


> +
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
>  static int viommu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev)
>  {
>  	int i;
> @@ -670,9 +710,8 @@ static int viommu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev)
>  		 * owns it.
>  		 */
>  		ret = viommu_domain_finalise(vdev, domain);
> -	} else if (vdomain->viommu != vdev->viommu) {
> -		dev_err(dev, "cannot attach to foreign vIOMMU\n");
> -		ret = -EXDEV;
> +	} else if (!viommu_endpoint_is_compatible(vdev, vdomain)) {
> +		ret = -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  	mutex_unlock(&vdomain->mutex);
>  
> @@ -886,6 +925,7 @@ static int viommu_add_device(struct device *dev)
>  
>  	vdev->dev = dev;
>  	vdev->viommu = viommu;
> +	vdev->pgsize_bitmap = viommu->pgsize_bitmap;
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vdev->resv_regions);
>  	dev_iommu_priv_set(dev, vdev);
>  
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_iommu.h b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_iommu.h
> index 48e3c29223b5..2cced7accc99 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_iommu.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_iommu.h

As any virtio UAPI change, you need to copy virtio TC at some point
before this is merged ...

> @@ -111,6 +111,7 @@ struct virtio_iommu_req_unmap {
>  
>  #define VIRTIO_IOMMU_PROBE_T_NONE		0
>  #define VIRTIO_IOMMU_PROBE_T_RESV_MEM		1
> +#define VIRTIO_IOMMU_PROBE_T_PAGE_SIZE_MASK	2
>  
>  #define VIRTIO_IOMMU_PROBE_T_MASK		0xfff
>

Does host need to know that guest will ignore the page size mask?
Maybe we need a feature bit.
  
> @@ -119,6 +120,12 @@ struct virtio_iommu_probe_property {
>  	__le16					length;
>  };
>  
> +struct virtio_iommu_probe_pgsize_mask {
> +	struct virtio_iommu_probe_property	head;
> +	__u8					reserved[4];
> +	__le64					pgsize_bitmap;
> +};
> +

This is UAPI. Document the format of pgsize_bitmap please.


>  #define VIRTIO_IOMMU_RESV_MEM_T_RESERVED	0
>  #define VIRTIO_IOMMU_RESV_MEM_T_MSI		1
>  
> -- 
> 2.17.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Bharat Bhushan <bbhushan2@marvell.com>
Cc: jean-philippe@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, jasowang@redhat.com,
	eric.auger.pro@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] iommu/virtio: Use page size bitmap supported by endpoint
Date: Tue, 5 May 2020 20:22:37 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200505200659-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200505093004.1935-1-bbhushan2@marvell.com>

On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 03:00:04PM +0530, Bharat Bhushan wrote:
> Different endpoint can support different page size, probe
> endpoint if it supports specific page size otherwise use
> global page sizes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bharat Bhushan <bbhushan2@marvell.com>
> ---
> v4->v5:
>  - Rebase to Linux v5.7-rc4
> 
> v3->v4:
>  - Fix whitespace error
> 
> v2->v3:
>  - Fixed error return for incompatible endpoint
>  - __u64 changed to __le64 in header file
> 
>  drivers/iommu/virtio-iommu.c      | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  include/uapi/linux/virtio_iommu.h |  7 +++++
>  2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/virtio-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/virtio-iommu.c
> index d5cac4f46ca5..9513d2ab819e 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/virtio-iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/virtio-iommu.c
> @@ -78,6 +78,7 @@ struct viommu_endpoint {
>  	struct viommu_dev		*viommu;
>  	struct viommu_domain		*vdomain;
>  	struct list_head		resv_regions;
> +	u64				pgsize_bitmap;
>  };
>  
>  struct viommu_request {
> @@ -415,6 +416,19 @@ static int viommu_replay_mappings(struct viommu_domain *vdomain)
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +static int viommu_set_pgsize_bitmap(struct viommu_endpoint *vdev,
> +				    struct virtio_iommu_probe_pgsize_mask *mask,
> +				    size_t len)
> +{
> +	u64 pgsize_bitmap = le64_to_cpu(mask->pgsize_bitmap);
> +
> +	if (len < sizeof(*mask))

This is too late to validate length, you have dereferenced it already.
do it before the read pls.

> +		return -EINVAL;

OK but note that guest will then just proceed to ignore the
property. Is that really OK? Wouldn't host want to know?


> +
> +	vdev->pgsize_bitmap = pgsize_bitmap;

what if bitmap is 0? Is that a valid size? I see a bunch of
BUG_ON with that value ...

I also see a bunch of code like e.g. this:

        pg_size = 1UL << __ffs(pgsize_bitmap);

which probably won't DTRT on a 32 bit guest if the bitmap has bits
set in the high word.



> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static int viommu_add_resv_mem(struct viommu_endpoint *vdev,
>  			       struct virtio_iommu_probe_resv_mem *mem,
>  			       size_t len)
> @@ -499,6 +513,9 @@ static int viommu_probe_endpoint(struct viommu_dev *viommu, struct device *dev)
>  		case VIRTIO_IOMMU_PROBE_T_RESV_MEM:
>  			ret = viommu_add_resv_mem(vdev, (void *)prop, len);
>  			break;
> +		case VIRTIO_IOMMU_PROBE_T_PAGE_SIZE_MASK:
> +			ret = viommu_set_pgsize_bitmap(vdev, (void *)prop, len);
> +			break;
>  		default:
>  			dev_err(dev, "unknown viommu prop 0x%x\n", type);
>  		}
> @@ -630,7 +647,7 @@ static int viommu_domain_finalise(struct viommu_endpoint *vdev,
>  
>  	vdomain->id		= (unsigned int)ret;
>  
> -	domain->pgsize_bitmap	= viommu->pgsize_bitmap;
> +	domain->pgsize_bitmap	= vdev->pgsize_bitmap;
>  	domain->geometry	= viommu->geometry;
>  
>  	vdomain->map_flags	= viommu->map_flags;
> @@ -654,6 +671,29 @@ static void viommu_domain_free(struct iommu_domain *domain)
>  	kfree(vdomain);
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * Check whether the endpoint's capabilities are compatible with other
> + * endpoints in the domain. Report any inconsistency.
> + */
> +static bool viommu_endpoint_is_compatible(struct viommu_endpoint *vdev,
> +					  struct viommu_domain *vdomain)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = vdev->dev;
> +
> +	if (vdomain->viommu != vdev->viommu) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "cannot attach to foreign vIOMMU\n");
> +		return false;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (vdomain->domain.pgsize_bitmap != vdev->pgsize_bitmap) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "incompatible domain bitmap 0x%lx != 0x%llx\n",
> +			vdomain->domain.pgsize_bitmap, vdev->pgsize_bitmap);
> +		return false;
> +	}

I'm confused by this. So let's assume host supports pages sizes
of 4k, 2M, 1G. It signals this in the properties. Nice.
Now domain supports 4k, 2M and that's all. Why is that a problem?
Just don't use 1G ...


> +
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
>  static int viommu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev)
>  {
>  	int i;
> @@ -670,9 +710,8 @@ static int viommu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev)
>  		 * owns it.
>  		 */
>  		ret = viommu_domain_finalise(vdev, domain);
> -	} else if (vdomain->viommu != vdev->viommu) {
> -		dev_err(dev, "cannot attach to foreign vIOMMU\n");
> -		ret = -EXDEV;
> +	} else if (!viommu_endpoint_is_compatible(vdev, vdomain)) {
> +		ret = -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  	mutex_unlock(&vdomain->mutex);
>  
> @@ -886,6 +925,7 @@ static int viommu_add_device(struct device *dev)
>  
>  	vdev->dev = dev;
>  	vdev->viommu = viommu;
> +	vdev->pgsize_bitmap = viommu->pgsize_bitmap;
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vdev->resv_regions);
>  	dev_iommu_priv_set(dev, vdev);
>  
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_iommu.h b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_iommu.h
> index 48e3c29223b5..2cced7accc99 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_iommu.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_iommu.h

As any virtio UAPI change, you need to copy virtio TC at some point
before this is merged ...

> @@ -111,6 +111,7 @@ struct virtio_iommu_req_unmap {
>  
>  #define VIRTIO_IOMMU_PROBE_T_NONE		0
>  #define VIRTIO_IOMMU_PROBE_T_RESV_MEM		1
> +#define VIRTIO_IOMMU_PROBE_T_PAGE_SIZE_MASK	2
>  
>  #define VIRTIO_IOMMU_PROBE_T_MASK		0xfff
>

Does host need to know that guest will ignore the page size mask?
Maybe we need a feature bit.
  
> @@ -119,6 +120,12 @@ struct virtio_iommu_probe_property {
>  	__le16					length;
>  };
>  
> +struct virtio_iommu_probe_pgsize_mask {
> +	struct virtio_iommu_probe_property	head;
> +	__u8					reserved[4];
> +	__le64					pgsize_bitmap;
> +};
> +

This is UAPI. Document the format of pgsize_bitmap please.


>  #define VIRTIO_IOMMU_RESV_MEM_T_RESERVED	0
>  #define VIRTIO_IOMMU_RESV_MEM_T_MSI		1
>  
> -- 
> 2.17.1

_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-06  0:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-05  9:30 [PATCH v5] iommu/virtio: Use page size bitmap supported by endpoint Bharat Bhushan
2020-05-05  9:30 ` Bharat Bhushan
2020-05-05  9:30 ` Bharat Bhushan
2020-05-06  0:22 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2020-05-06  0:22   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-05-07 11:24   ` [EXT] " Bharat Bhushan
2020-05-07 11:24     ` Bharat Bhushan
2020-05-07 11:24     ` Bharat Bhushan
2020-05-07 11:32     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-05-07 11:32       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-05-07 11:32       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-05-07 12:51       ` Auger Eric
2020-05-07 12:51         ` Auger Eric
2020-05-07 12:51         ` Auger Eric
2020-05-07 13:00         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-05-07 13:00           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-05-07 13:00           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-05-07 12:43     ` Auger Eric
2020-05-07 12:43       ` Auger Eric
2020-05-07 12:43       ` Auger Eric
2020-05-07 12:52   ` Auger Eric
2020-05-07 12:52     ` Auger Eric
2020-05-13  9:15   ` [EXT] " Bharat Bhushan
2020-05-13  9:15     ` Bharat Bhushan
2020-05-13  9:15     ` Bharat Bhushan
2020-05-13 10:45     ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2020-05-13 10:45       ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2020-05-13 10:45       ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2020-05-12 14:53 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-05-12 14:53   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-05-12 16:47   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2020-05-12 16:47     ` Jean-Philippe Brucker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200505200659-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
    --to=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=bbhushan2@marvell.com \
    --cc=eric.auger.pro@gmail.com \
    --cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.