From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43B07C28CBC for ; Wed, 6 May 2020 13:22:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0966A206DB for ; Wed, 6 May 2020 13:22:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="gFM+P5yQ" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 0966A206DB Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:53010 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jWK0I-0005Qk-4C for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Wed, 06 May 2020 09:22:26 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44066) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jWJzd-0004wu-MQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 06 May 2020 09:21:45 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.61]:25459 helo=us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jWJzb-0008Sj-RY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 06 May 2020 09:21:45 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1588771302; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=EgT58My8YpUqUsiajyUuVZmQqfP3arbUbrHc2cv2rBw=; b=gFM+P5yQJE/0cvNYdKVoRKIQsaOcrYJuRKPyBnetc3up39+2jwrnZCPaF8WQQScI+WWsPg ZNT3tYDSMe73/gkSrlQphwmvRWHmeAx8DhJSFPQvvnIeH1WUe5vpC4G/9ebKor4NkdJWoe 3d867XJSzk0alh0nnfPN8XT5UikdmqM= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-470-h1yeQDhTOWeIeH-jd0u5TQ-1; Wed, 06 May 2020 09:21:37 -0400 X-MC-Unique: h1yeQDhTOWeIeH-jd0u5TQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A008E464; Wed, 6 May 2020 13:21:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from linux.fritz.box (ovpn-113-140.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.113.140]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9217E6061C; Wed, 6 May 2020 13:21:35 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 6 May 2020 15:21:34 +0200 From: Kevin Wolf To: Max Reitz Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 15/33] block: Pull out bdrv_default_perms_for_backing() Message-ID: <20200506132134.GF6333@linux.fritz.box> References: <20200218124242.584644-1-mreitz@redhat.com> <20200218124242.584644-16-mreitz@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200218124242.584644-16-mreitz@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.13 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Received-SPF: pass client-ip=205.139.110.61; envelope-from=kwolf@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/05/06 05:50:09 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Am 18.02.2020 um 13:42 hat Max Reitz geschrieben: > Right now, bdrv_format_default_perms() is used by format parents > (generally). We want to switch to a model where most parents use a > single BdrvChildClass, which then decides the permissions based on the > child role. To do so, we have to split bdrv_format_default_perms() into > separate functions for each such role. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Max Reitz > Reviewed-by: Eric Blake As you want to call this based on the child role, would bdrv_default_perms_for_cow() be a more obvious name? Kevin