All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.com>,
	Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>, Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
	"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
	Raj Ashok <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 4/8] iommu/vt-d: Add bind guest PASID support
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 22:59:30 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200514055930.GD22388@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1589410909-38925-5-git-send-email-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>

> +	if (dev_is_pci(dev)) {
> +		/* VT-d supports devices with full 20 bit PASIDs only */
> +		if (pci_max_pasids(to_pci_dev(dev)) != PASID_MAX)
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +	} else {
> +		return -ENOTSUPP;
> +	}

This looks strange.  Why not:

	if (!dev_is_pci(dev)) {
		return -ENOTSUPP;

	/* VT-d supports devices with full 20 bit PASIDs only */
	if (pci_max_pasids(to_pci_dev(dev)) != PASID_MAX)
		return -EINVAL;

> +		for_each_svm_dev(sdev, svm, dev) {
> +			/*
> +			 * For devices with aux domains, we should allow multiple
> +			 * bind calls with the same PASID and pdev.
> +			 */
> +			if (iommu_dev_feature_enabled(dev, IOMMU_DEV_FEAT_AUX)) {
> +				sdev->users++;
> +			} else {
> +				dev_warn_ratelimited(dev, "Already bound with PASID %u\n",
> +						svm->pasid);
> +				ret = -EBUSY;
> +			}
> +			goto out;

Is this intentionally a for loop that jumps out of the loop after
the first device?

> +	/*
> +	 * PASID table is per device for better security. Therefore, for
> +	 * each bind of a new device even with an existing PASID, we need to
> +	 * call the nested mode setup function here.
> +	 */
> +	spin_lock(&iommu->lock);
> +	ret = intel_pasid_setup_nested(iommu,
> +				       dev,
> +				       (pgd_t *)data->gpgd,
> +				       data->hpasid,
> +				       &data->vtd,
> +				       dmar_domain,
> +				       data->addr_width);

Why not:

	et = intel_pasid_setup_nested(iommu, dev, (pgd_t *)data->gpgd,
			data->hpasid, &data->vtd, dmar_domain,
			data->addr_width);

?

> +	for_each_svm_dev(sdev, svm, dev) {
> +		ret = 0;

		...

> +		break;
> +	}

Same only looks at the first device style.  Why dos it only care about
the first device?  That needs at least a comment, and probably a
first_svm_dev or so heper to make it explicit.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	Raj Ashok <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.com>,
	Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 4/8] iommu/vt-d: Add bind guest PASID support
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 22:59:30 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200514055930.GD22388@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1589410909-38925-5-git-send-email-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>

> +	if (dev_is_pci(dev)) {
> +		/* VT-d supports devices with full 20 bit PASIDs only */
> +		if (pci_max_pasids(to_pci_dev(dev)) != PASID_MAX)
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +	} else {
> +		return -ENOTSUPP;
> +	}

This looks strange.  Why not:

	if (!dev_is_pci(dev)) {
		return -ENOTSUPP;

	/* VT-d supports devices with full 20 bit PASIDs only */
	if (pci_max_pasids(to_pci_dev(dev)) != PASID_MAX)
		return -EINVAL;

> +		for_each_svm_dev(sdev, svm, dev) {
> +			/*
> +			 * For devices with aux domains, we should allow multiple
> +			 * bind calls with the same PASID and pdev.
> +			 */
> +			if (iommu_dev_feature_enabled(dev, IOMMU_DEV_FEAT_AUX)) {
> +				sdev->users++;
> +			} else {
> +				dev_warn_ratelimited(dev, "Already bound with PASID %u\n",
> +						svm->pasid);
> +				ret = -EBUSY;
> +			}
> +			goto out;

Is this intentionally a for loop that jumps out of the loop after
the first device?

> +	/*
> +	 * PASID table is per device for better security. Therefore, for
> +	 * each bind of a new device even with an existing PASID, we need to
> +	 * call the nested mode setup function here.
> +	 */
> +	spin_lock(&iommu->lock);
> +	ret = intel_pasid_setup_nested(iommu,
> +				       dev,
> +				       (pgd_t *)data->gpgd,
> +				       data->hpasid,
> +				       &data->vtd,
> +				       dmar_domain,
> +				       data->addr_width);

Why not:

	et = intel_pasid_setup_nested(iommu, dev, (pgd_t *)data->gpgd,
			data->hpasid, &data->vtd, dmar_domain,
			data->addr_width);

?

> +	for_each_svm_dev(sdev, svm, dev) {
> +		ret = 0;

		...

> +		break;
> +	}

Same only looks at the first device style.  Why dos it only care about
the first device?  That needs at least a comment, and probably a
first_svm_dev or so heper to make it explicit.
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-14  5:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-13 23:01 [PATCH v13 0/8] Nested Shared Virtual Address (SVA) VT-d support Jacob Pan
2020-05-13 23:01 ` Jacob Pan
2020-05-13 23:01 ` [PATCH v13 1/8] iommu/vt-d: Move domain helper to header Jacob Pan
2020-05-13 23:01   ` Jacob Pan
2020-05-13 23:01 ` [PATCH v13 2/8] iommu/vt-d: Use a helper function to skip agaw for SL Jacob Pan
2020-05-13 23:01   ` Jacob Pan
2020-05-14  5:51   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-14  5:51     ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-14 15:20     ` Jacob Pan
2020-05-14 15:20       ` Jacob Pan
2020-05-13 23:01 ` [PATCH v13 3/8] iommu/vt-d: Add nested translation helper function Jacob Pan
2020-05-13 23:01   ` Jacob Pan
2020-05-14  5:54   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-14  5:54     ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-14 15:31     ` Jacob Pan
2020-05-14 15:31       ` Jacob Pan
2020-05-13 23:01 ` [PATCH v13 4/8] iommu/vt-d: Add bind guest PASID support Jacob Pan
2020-05-13 23:01   ` Jacob Pan
2020-05-14  5:59   ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2020-05-14  5:59     ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-14 15:57     ` Jacob Pan
2020-05-14 15:57       ` Jacob Pan
2020-05-15  1:01       ` Lu Baolu
2020-05-15  1:01         ` Lu Baolu
2020-05-16  6:02       ` Lu Baolu
2020-05-16  6:02         ` Lu Baolu
2020-05-13 23:01 ` [PATCH v13 5/8] iommu/vt-d: Support flushing more translation cache types Jacob Pan
2020-05-13 23:01   ` Jacob Pan
2020-05-13 23:01 ` [PATCH v13 6/8] iommu/vt-d: Add svm/sva invalidate function Jacob Pan
2020-05-13 23:01   ` Jacob Pan
2020-05-13 23:01 ` [PATCH v13 7/8] iommu/vt-d: Enlightened PASID allocation Jacob Pan
2020-05-13 23:01   ` Jacob Pan
2020-05-13 23:01 ` [PATCH v13 8/8] iommu/vt-d: Add custom allocator for IOASID Jacob Pan
2020-05-13 23:01   ` Jacob Pan
2020-05-16  6:31 ` [PATCH v13 0/8] Nested Shared Virtual Address (SVA) VT-d support Lu Baolu
2020-05-16  6:31   ` Lu Baolu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200514055930.GD22388@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jean-philippe@linaro.com \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH v13 4/8] iommu/vt-d: Add bind guest PASID support' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.