All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@android.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] driver core: Add state_synced sysfs file for devices that support it
Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 08:13:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200514061351.GB1457703@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGETcx8pATaNMrwHQtF2_Yds1D6JOLTDgyD7Tda6cku+dz3wJw@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 11:49:57AM -0700, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 1:34 AM Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 1:22 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 06:34:15PM -0700, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> > > > This can be used to check if a device supports sync_state() callbacks
> > > > and therefore keeps resources left on by the bootloader enabled till all
> > > > its consumers have probed.
> > > >
> > > > This can also be used to check if sync_state() has been called for a
> > > > device or whether it is still trying to keep resources enabled because
> > > > they were left enabled by the bootloader and all its consumers haven't
> > > > probed yet.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  .../ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-state_synced    | 24 +++++++++++++++++++
> > > >  drivers/base/dd.c                             | 16 +++++++++++++
> > > >  2 files changed, 40 insertions(+)
> > > >  create mode 100644 Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-state_synced
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-state_synced b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-state_synced
> > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > index 000000000000..0c922d7d02fc
> > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-state_synced
> > > > @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
> > > > +What:                /sys/devices/.../state_synced
> > > > +Date:                May 2020
> > > > +Contact:     Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
> > > > +Description:
> > > > +             The /sys/devices/.../state_synced attribute is only present for
> > > > +             devices whose bus types or driver provides the .sync_state()
> > > > +             callback. The number read from it (0 or 1) reflects the value
> > > > +             of the device's 'state_synced' field. A value of 0 means the
> > > > +             .sync_state() callback hasn't been called yet. A value of 1
> > > > +             means the .sync_state() callback has been called.
> > > > +
> > > > +             Generally, if a device has sync_state() support and has some of
> > > > +             the resources it provides enabled at the time the kernel starts
> > > > +             (Eg: enabled by hardware reset or bootloader or anything that
> > > > +             run before the kernel starts), then it'll keep those resources
> > > > +             enabled and in a state that's compatible with the state they
> > > > +             were in at the start of the kernel. The device will stop doing
> > > > +             this only when the sync_state() callback has been called --
> > > > +             which happens only when all its consumer devices are registered
> > > > +             and have probed successfully. Resources that were left disabled
> > > > +             at the time the kernel starts are not affected or limited in
> > > > +             any way by sync_state() callbacks.
> > > > +
> > > > +
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/base/dd.c b/drivers/base/dd.c
> > > > index 48ca81cb8ebc..72599436ae84 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/base/dd.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/base/dd.c
> > > > @@ -458,6 +458,13 @@ static void driver_deferred_probe_add_trigger(struct device *dev,
> > > >               driver_deferred_probe_trigger();
> > > >  }
> > > >
> > > > +static ssize_t state_synced_show(struct device *dev,
> > > > +                              struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> > > > +{
> > > > +     return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", dev->state_synced);
> > > > +}
> > > > +static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(state_synced);
> > > > +
> > > >  static int really_probe(struct device *dev, struct device_driver *drv)
> > > >  {
> > > >       int ret = -EPROBE_DEFER;
> > > > @@ -531,9 +538,16 @@ static int really_probe(struct device *dev, struct device_driver *drv)
> > > >               goto dev_groups_failed;
> > > >       }
> > > >
> > > > +     if (dev_has_sync_state(dev) &&
> > > > +         device_create_file(dev, &dev_attr_state_synced)) {
> > > > +             dev_err(dev, "state_synced sysfs add failed\n");
> > > > +             goto dev_sysfs_state_synced_failed;
> > > > +     }
> > >
> > > Why not add this to the groups above this and only enable it if needed
> > > at runtime?
> >
> > Those groups above seem to be driver specific groups. Looking at the
> > code, some drivers seem to be setting them. Also, this attribute can
> > only be decided after a driver has successfully bound to the device
> > because dev_has_sync_state() has to check the bus and the driver for
> > sync_state() support.
> >
> > > The is_visible() callback should be what you need to use here.
> >
> > If this is an attribute specific property, it might work. I'll take a look.
> 
> I took a look at is_visible(). It only makes sense for a group of
> attributes that are exposed in a sub directory. But state_synced is a
> top level property IMO. What I'm doing is similar to the "online"
> attribute that's exposed for a device.

No, no need for a subdirectory for an attribute group.  If you don't
have a name for the group, the files will be placed in the device's
directory.

> And even if I create a group with one lone attribute, I'll still have
> to add it after the device has probed or have to call
> sysfs_update_groups() after the device is probed to update the
> visibility. Seems quite messy and unnecessarily complicated.

Ah, ok, that is messier.

> I'd like to keep this an attribute and not create a group for that
> reason. Does that sound okay to you? I'll obviously still do the clean
> up correctly.

Ok, that's fine, we can change it later if we figure it out.

thanks,

greg k-h

      reply	other threads:[~2020-05-14  6:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-13  1:34 [PATCH v1] driver core: Add state_synced sysfs file for devices that support it Saravana Kannan
2020-05-13  8:22 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-05-13  8:34   ` Saravana Kannan
2020-05-13 18:49     ` Saravana Kannan
2020-05-14  6:13       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200514061351.GB1457703@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=saravanak@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.