From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Improve execute_cb struct packing
Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 22:22:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200514212206.10468-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> (raw)
Reduce the irq_work llist for attaching the callbacks to the signal for
both smaller structs (two fewer pointers!) and simpler [debug] code:
Function old new delta
irq_execute_cb 35 34 -1
__igt_breadcrumbs_smoketest 1684 1682 -2
i915_request_retire 2003 1996 -7
__i915_request_create 1047 1040 -7
__notify_execute_cb 135 126 -9
__i915_request_ctor 188 178 -10
__await_execution.part.constprop 451 440 -11
igt_wait_request 924 714 -210
One minor artifact is that the order of cb exection is reversed. No
current use cases are affected by that change.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c | 18 +++++++++---------
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
index 526c1e9acbd5..25571a342468 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
@@ -42,7 +42,6 @@
#include "intel_pm.h"
struct execute_cb {
- struct list_head link;
struct irq_work work;
struct i915_sw_fence *fence;
void (*hook)(struct i915_request *rq, struct dma_fence *signal);
@@ -158,14 +157,14 @@ static void irq_execute_cb_hook(struct irq_work *wrk)
static void __notify_execute_cb(struct i915_request *rq)
{
- struct execute_cb *cb;
+ struct execute_cb *cb, *cn;
lockdep_assert_held(&rq->lock);
- if (list_empty(&rq->execute_cb))
+ if (llist_empty(&rq->execute_cb))
return;
- list_for_each_entry(cb, &rq->execute_cb, link)
+ llist_for_each_entry_safe(cb, cn, rq->execute_cb.first, work.llnode)
irq_work_queue(&cb->work);
/*
@@ -178,7 +177,7 @@ static void __notify_execute_cb(struct i915_request *rq)
* preempt-to-idle cycle on the target engine, all the while the
* master execute_cb may refire.
*/
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rq->execute_cb);
+ rq->execute_cb.first = NULL;
}
static inline void
@@ -296,7 +295,7 @@ bool i915_request_retire(struct i915_request *rq)
set_bit(I915_FENCE_FLAG_ACTIVE, &rq->fence.flags);
__notify_execute_cb(rq);
}
- GEM_BUG_ON(!list_empty(&rq->execute_cb));
+ GEM_BUG_ON(!llist_empty(&rq->execute_cb));
spin_unlock_irq(&rq->lock);
remove_from_client(rq);
@@ -364,7 +363,8 @@ __await_execution(struct i915_request *rq,
i915_sw_fence_complete(cb->fence);
kmem_cache_free(global.slab_execute_cbs, cb);
} else {
- list_add_tail(&cb->link, &signal->execute_cb);
+ cb->work.llnode.next = signal->execute_cb.first;
+ signal->execute_cb.first = &cb->work.llnode;
}
spin_unlock_irq(&signal->lock);
@@ -673,7 +673,7 @@ static void __i915_request_ctor(void *arg)
rq->file_priv = NULL;
rq->capture_list = NULL;
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rq->execute_cb);
+ init_llist_head(&rq->execute_cb);
}
struct i915_request *
@@ -763,7 +763,7 @@ __i915_request_create(struct intel_context *ce, gfp_t gfp)
rq->batch = NULL;
GEM_BUG_ON(rq->file_priv);
GEM_BUG_ON(rq->capture_list);
- GEM_BUG_ON(!list_empty(&rq->execute_cb));
+ GEM_BUG_ON(!llist_empty(&rq->execute_cb));
/*
* Reserve space in the ring buffer for all the commands required to
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.h
index 8ec7ee4dbadc..5d4709a3dace 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.h
@@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ struct i915_request {
ktime_t emitted;
} duration;
};
- struct list_head execute_cb;
+ struct llist_head execute_cb;
struct i915_sw_fence semaphore;
/*
--
2.20.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next reply other threads:[~2020-05-14 21:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-14 21:22 Chris Wilson [this message]
2020-05-15 18:35 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Improve execute_cb struct packing Patchwork
2020-05-15 22:16 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200514212206.10468-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--to=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.