From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 391E0C433DF for ; Tue, 19 May 2020 08:05:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E944207D8 for ; Tue, 19 May 2020 08:05:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728582AbgESIFD (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 May 2020 04:05:03 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:42862 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727987AbgESIFD (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 May 2020 04:05:03 -0400 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 789C768B05; Tue, 19 May 2020 10:04:59 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 10:04:59 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, jack@suse.cz, adilger@dilger.ca, riteshh@linux.ibm.com, amir73il@gmail.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: fix fiemap for ext4 bitmap files (+ cleanups) v3 Message-ID: <20200519080459.GA26074@lst.de> References: <20200505154324.3226743-1-hch@lst.de> <20200507062419.GA5766@lst.de> <20200507144947.GJ404484@mit.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200507144947.GJ404484@mit.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-unionfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 10:49:47AM -0400, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote: > > Folks, I think the first two patches should go into 5.7 to fix the > > ext4 vs overlay problem. Ted, are you going to pick this up, or Al? > > I'll pick up the two fixes, thanks. Which tree are the rest of the > patches going to go through? When are you going to send the first two to Linus? This fixes a 5.7 regression and I'd like to see it fixed before the release, nevermind have the rest of the series queued up for 5.8 one way or another.